thats about right, the effeciency of the series engines is down on lpg due to the basic nature of the engine namely that its low compression.
on petrol they can do 15l/100 but realistically expect 17/100 as a good figure 19-21/100 as about average.
G'day all
I was wanting to know the fuel consumption of a Series 3 109 four cyclinder petrol. I did a search and fuel consumption was mentioned in a number of threads but I couldn't actually find one that gave figures.
My 2.25 is dual fuel and I calculated other day that it uses approx 24 l per 100 km and by my experience with LPG cars that should equate to about 19 l per 100 km if running on petrol which is about that of a V8 Disco.
Can anyone sheeld some light on this for me.
Regards![]()
thats about right, the effeciency of the series engines is down on lpg due to the basic nature of the engine namely that its low compression.
on petrol they can do 15l/100 but realistically expect 17/100 as a good figure 19-21/100 as about average.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
In all of my driving a series 3 which was my everyday drive I averaged 17mpg overall - a little better on the highway - a little less around town. The Series 3 was replaced by a brand new 3.9V8 disco which overall gave the same fuel consumption.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Thanks guys I thought so but didn't want to believe it. It is a good thing it is so much fun to drive.
Does a Holden six fitted to one of these things do any better?
Regards
not really![]()
Not significantly, although with changed gearing you might do a little better. Problem is that although higher compression, most Holden engines are significantly more powerful, so you drive faster!
The 2.25 petrol engine is designed for reliability, durability, driveability and use of low grade fuel. Note that economy did not get a mention! Add to this a totally unstreamlined shape, and a quite substantial mass, and fuel economy is not going to be good.
The economy device that was optional on 2a 88s is a heavy spring that comes into play at about half throttle. Either this or take note of the comments in the 2a owner's handbook "In common with all vehicles the petrol consumption mounts rapidly if high speeds are maintained. For example, at 50mph (80kph) the consumption in miles per gallon will be one and a half times as much as at 30mph (48kph) and at 70mph (112kph) the rate will be twice as much."
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
My 109 with a 186 on gas uses 26L/100km average with city, suburban and freeway driving on 7.5/16 tyres.
I keep telling my self that at the half price (13l/100kmit is just as good as an average modern 4x4.
![]()
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks