Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Wide tyres on a SIII

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by vnx205 View Post
    I believe there is a school of thought that says that this is not necessarily true.

    There seems to be some evidence that a longer footprint is more important than a wider footprint.

    That notion would seem to be supported by the fact that when you reduce the pressure, the increase in the length of the footprint is usually greater than the increase in width.

    I have seen people argue that in certain soft conditions, a wide tyre performs worse than narrower tyre at the right pressure.
    A wider tyre will increase its length as much as a narrow tyre. When you decrease the pressures, neither narrow or wide tyres increase their width on the ground.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  2. #12
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,529
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The ground pressure will, for all practical purposes, be the same as the tyre pressure (the sidewall stiffness will add some pressure, but for most real life situations this is negligible.

    So on this basis, the width should make no difference as long as the tyre can operate at the necessary pressure, although fitting/not fitting existing ruts may be a factor. I can't see how diameter can make any significant direct difference either, although it will make a very sigificant indirect difference - larger diameter means better ground clearance, and the difference between dragging the diff through the mud and not doing this really does make a difference.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #13
    C00P Guest
    Interesting thread. My brother and I watched a lot of 4WD's trying to get up Big Red near Birdsville. They were all running wide tyres, which may have been standard on some of their vehicles, and taking long runups with heaps of power. Some made it, some didn't.
    My brother (who has been around Landies much more than me) instructed me to drop the pressure on my SIII's tyres to about 12 PSI, which I did, and then we just drove up it in low range second. She pinked a bit near the top when I gave it full throttle and I was going to reach for another gear but brother stopped me and we chugged over the top no problems. Lots of people took photos as we appeared at the top <smug grin>.
    My brother commented that it wasn't so much the vehicle, but the tyre pressure and how you drove it that was important. He was critical of those using lots of power as some were just "burying" their wheels. Me, I'm just a newbie at this, but I was pretty pleased, as you can well imagine....
    By the way, we had to drive up the back of Big Red as the front is under about 10' of water as far as the eye can see in both directions. They call this the Simpson Desert?

    Coop
    BVille BR1.jpg

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The ground pressure will, for all practical purposes, be the same as the tyre pressure (the sidewall stiffness will add some pressure, but for most real life situations this is negligible.
    No so. A while back I saw a study that someone did of contact patch size on flat ground for different tyres at the same pressure. There were huge differences.

    n.b. contact patch was measured as total surface area directly in contact with the ground.

  5. #15
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,529
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    No so. A while back I saw a study that someone did of contact patch size on flat ground for different tyres at the same pressure. There were huge differences.
    But this will depend on sidewall and belt stiffness rather than width. To the extent that this is due to the belt stiffness, larger diameter will reduce the effect, but I would be very sceptical whether the practical difference (say 29" - 32") is significant. Do you have a link for the study?

    Another point is that on the face of it, everything being equal, a 15" tyre will dislodge from the rim more easily than a 15", as the tangential load on the bead is greater for the same torque.

    My personal experience with wide tyres was in desert operations in the sixties - all available tyres then were 100% section, so some of the wide tyres had smaller wheels - and they came off the rims if pressure was lowered enough to be usable. Standard tyres (7.50 on the small vehicles) were just as effective, but when radials became available they were much more effective, mainly because lower pressures could be used without destroying the tyres fairly rapidly.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Do you have a link for the study?
    Can't find the particular study (done with 4x4 tyres) atm, but here is another:
    Fact or Fiction? Tire contact patch and air pressure.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The ground pressure will, for all practical purposes, be the same as the tyre pressure (the sidewall stiffness will add some pressure, but for most real life situations this is negligible.

    So on this basis, the width should make no difference as long as the tyre can operate at the necessary pressure, although fitting/not fitting existing ruts may be a factor. I can't see how diameter can make any significant direct difference either, although it will make a very sigificant indirect difference - larger diameter means better ground clearance, and the difference between dragging the diff through the mud and not doing this really does make a difference.

    John

    its the lead in angle that counts, think of it like an approach angle.

    try this..

    take small socket and look at it from the round end and place it ontop of a sponge and push it in say 5mm notice theres quite a steep angle at the point of contact on the sponge in relation to the circumference of the socket.

    Now try it with a larger socket.

    Whats happening is an effect of "The angle of the tangent at the point of contact and that ties into rolling resistance. Heres how it works.

    We all know that any line that has the circumference of a circle touching anywhere along its mid point is doing so at right angles to the radius of the circle at the point of contact. Where the wheel makes initial contact to the ground this same geometric concept is in effect. If we assume that the weight of the wheel is always directly down (ignoring hill climbing and motion at this stage) as the wheel sinks into the ground the angle of the point of contact is increased, quickly for the smaller diameter wheel and less so for the larger one.

    Thats why generally a taller tyre travels better throught mud and sand (ignoring the extra ground clearance) Its expending less energy trying to get ontop of the sand/mud.

    there are other factors that come into play such as the length of the contact patch and how much it "stretches" as the tyre pressure is lowered (sidewall flex permitting, a licorice strip is going to run out of sidewall clearance long before it gets any decent tread lenght increase) The rolling resistance from a narrow leading edge compared to a longer one and the construction of the tyres.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    A larger diameter tyre also has the ability to produce a longer footprint.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  9. #19
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,529
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Can't find the particular study (done with 4x4 tyres) atm, but here is another:
    Fact or Fiction? Tire contact patch and air pressure.
    Obviously in this example, the structure of the tyre is supporting a substantial part of the weight. Whether this is true of the tyres we actually use I do not know, but suspect it is not necessarily the case. Worth noting that in the example however, the front and rear tyres, presumably with similar construction, show little difference in ground pressure for changes in width.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Obviously in this example, the structure of the tyre is supporting a substantial part of the weight. Whether this is true of the tyres we actually use I do not know, but suspect it is not necessarily the case. Worth noting that in the example however, the front and rear tyres, presumably with similar construction, show little difference in ground pressure for changes in width.

    John
    What justification do you have for this??? If anything 4x4 tyres would have stiffer sidewalls.

    This tyre is at 0 psi. Note the gap between the rim and the rocks.


    Many 4x4ers in the US who use military surplus tyres run them at 0 psi offroad.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!