Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: 202/3.3L conversion with varijet carby

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0

    202/3.3L conversion with varijet carby

    I am currently working on replacing my L/R 2.6L 6cyl with a Commodore 202/3.3L 6cyl engine, hope to be able to make the swap in a few weeks time.
    The 202 came with a Varijet carby, which has lots of hose connections, I assume for emission control etc, as well, the inlet manifold too seems to have a lot of vacuum hose connections as well as some to the cylinder head, which looks like water connections.
    I also assume that most of these hose connections are really not required in my SIII.
    My question is, which connections on the carby are a must have connected to the inlet manifold etc. and which connections can I just block off.
    Would appreciate any help on this, thanks.

  2. #2
    Rangier Rover Guest
    I'm not a fan of GMH in Landys Although the 2.6 Six were no good. Since no one has spoken.... what year model is your S111? The commy six aren't a good one to use as you have found out. Start pulling that polution crap off and it will need a retune. The 202 also hate being reved hard on stock gearing. Depends on year model the 186 is the most durable. We have converted a few here and the 202s all burnt holes in pistons or spat small ends They are useless off road.Tony

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rangier Rover View Post
    I'm not a fan of GMH in Landys Although the 2.6 Six were no good. Since no one has spoken.... what year model is your S111? The commy six aren't a good one to use as you have found out. Start pulling that polution crap off and it will need a retune. The 202 also hate being reved hard on stock gearing. Depends on year model the 186 is the most durable. We have converted a few here and the 202s all burnt holes in pistons or spat small ends Tony
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^X2^^^^^^^^^^
    Put a ford 6 in it if any thing or a hemi 6

  4. #4
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,708
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Jeez, I hope the 202 in my IIA is OK. I haven't got it going yet. I was thinking of fitting Rangie 3.54 diffs front and back
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #5
    Rangier Rover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rangieman View Post
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^X2^^^^^^^^^^
    Put a ford 6 in it if any thing or a hemi 6
    Hemi 245 They will rev like I did not suggest this as I asume this guy is stuck with GMH

  6. #6
    Rangier Rover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    Jeez, I hope the 202 in my IIA is OK. I haven't got it going yet. I was thinking of fitting Rangie 3.54 diffs front and back
    High ratio HR gear in transfer is best The last 3.54 I put in a 4.7.... Well lets say the housing lost some weight You will find out why. Other drama was Low range was taller and Series boxes don't enjoy a lot of 1st gear work. As is on end of shaft and kills small bearing. Set gearing up so 2nd does hard work and they dont fail as shares load on shaft. Holden have a bad torque curve for this. Mainly 202. Thay are flat then snarly in mid range. 202 don't cope with being run at 4000 RPM under light load.161,173,179,186 are only ones that last out of Reds. Do not spin the tyres. Just my experiences This is why I dont like GMH in Series. Remember.... Go easy on 1st then 2nd give it hell. Tony

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My '76 LWB SIII is not going to be used for 'heavy' off road, it has been converted to a camper van, so will do a lot of highway miles, it does have a Fairey Overdrive fitted, also, the gearbox was totally rebuilt some months back now.
    It will hit tracks for sure but nothing anything close to crawling speed and/or winching....been there done that

    It is my weekender for when I go fly fishing and sleeping under the stars

    So the question really still remains, which hose connections are a must have to the Varijet carby, thanks people.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    darwin, nt
    Posts
    532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One quick headsup: if your 3.3 was mated to an auto originally, the vacuum advance port in the carb is designed the wrong way round, full advance at idle. I had that problem on the earlier Holden carby on my S3.

    Dan.
    69 2a 88" pet4, 74 3 109" pet4, 68 2b FC pet6.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rangier Rover View Post
    I'm not a fan of GMH in Landys Although the 2.6 Six were no good. Since no one has spoken.... what year model is your S111? The commy six aren't a good one to use as you have found out. Start pulling that polution crap off and it will need a retune. The 202 also hate being reved hard on stock gearing. Depends on year model the 186 is the most durable. We have converted a few here and the 202s all burnt holes in pistons or spat small ends They are useless off road.Tony
    They do this because you have taken a low speed high torque passenger car engine and put it into a car with low gearing that requires it to rev for prolonged periods at speeds the manufacturer never intended. Properly modified to its new application you will have no problems. Remember the Torana GTR's with XU1 option pack? They won Bathurst revving between 5000 and 7000 for 500 miles without problems. You just have to suit the engine to the application. I operated the standard engines in much abused fleet cars for in excess of 300,000 k's without dismantling. The Chrysler Hemi 6 is a better conversion but will chew up and spit out any Series transmission in short order if hard used. The Falcon is the heaviest and bulkiest of the three and would be a last resort in my opinion.
    URSUSMAJOR

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dandlandyman View Post
    One quick headsup: if your 3.3 was mated to an auto originally, the vacuum advance port in the carb is designed the wrong way round, full advance at idle. I had that problem on the earlier Holden carby on my S3.

    Dan.
    69 2a 88" pet4, 74 3 109" pet4, 68 2b FC pet6.
    thanks for that Dan, very good headsup!
    It was mated to an auto, do you have a solution?...if I need to get hold of another/manual gearbox carby I do so, they are easily and cheap to come by these days

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!