Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Renovating Leaf Springs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Near Geelong, Vic.
    Posts
    453
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Renovating Leaf Springs

    Whilst doing my 2A resto, I remember reading a thread regarding the overhaul of rusty possibly seized leaf springs. I've done a search but I get so many hits it will take hours to get to where I need to be. The thread dealt with dismantling, de-rusting, lubrication ( or not!) and re-assembly.


    Can someone give me a link?


    My Peugeot 404 ute's rear springs are positively scaly with rust on the bits I can see. I can see no reason why the bits I can't see will be the same so I have my doubts they will flex & work properly on the road.


    The good news is, unlike the LR, the spring assemblies unbolt & come out. So, shackle bushes can be dealt with in a press.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Horsley Park, Sydney
    Posts
    2,939
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There has been a bits and pieces written in many posts. I am covering what we are doing in a Series 1 restoration. On the Series 1 there is good technical information on the spring design in the Factory Workshop Manual.


    Bundalenes '51 Restoration


    Pages 8 to 13 of this post.

    What information are you after.

    Basically measure, disassemble, molasses bath for a week, pressure clean, dry, light clean with a wire brush, paint with Penetrol, dry for 24hrs, grease with graphite if appropriate for that vehicle and re-assemble. Insert new bushes with lubricant job DONE


    Erich

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Near Geelong, Vic.
    Posts
    453
    Total Downloaded
    0

    How to Renovate Leaf Springs.

    OK!


    I plan to pull them apart- easy as they're held together by a u-shaped clamp & a bolt rather than a tang that may need oxy-acetylene heat to bend.


    Then wire brush/stripper pad to de-rust.


    Then paint? What's the best? Or is it not worth it as friction will rub it off?


    I remember the debate raged over whether to lubricate or not. Is dusting with graphite powder between the leaves the go? Didn't some older upmarket British cars actually use grease & leather gaiters??


    Then new bushes = job done.

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by geodon View Post
    OK!


    I plan to pull them apart- easy as they're held together by a u-shaped clamp & a bolt rather than a tang that may need oxy-acetylene heat to bend.


    Then wire brush/stripper pad to de-rust.


    Then paint? What's the best? Or is it not worth it as friction will rub it off?


    I remember the debate raged over whether to lubricate or not. Is dusting with graphite powder between the leaves the go? Didn't some older upmarket British cars actually use grease & leather gaiters??


    Then new bushes = job done.
    Paint - I would paint the leaves even though it will rub off parts of them - the bits that do not rub will be protected. Use whatever you would use on the chassis.

    Unless the car is going to see a lot of use on dusty roads, I would lubricate them when assembling with either graphite grease or MoS2 grease. This will tend to repel water that graphite will not.

    Many luxury cars from all countries (in the days when luxury cars used leaf springs) used leather gaiters filled with grease. This is a high maintenance solution, and the leather is very likely to crack in the Australian climate. Once water and mud gets in, they are worse than useless.

    An alternative is to interleave with something to reduce friction. Traditionally this was thin sheets of zinc, or occasionally other metals. Today teflon sheets would be used instead, and I have seen them sold in widths to suit springs. Either of these will also tend to be high maintenance as the interleaves will wear fairly rapidly and need replacing. If there are a lot of leaves, the extra thickness may require longer centrebolt and U-bolts.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    20
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    An alternative is to interleave with something to reduce friction.
    John

    The friction is part of the shock absorbing system. Less friction in the springs means stiffer shock absorbers. After replacing my original springs on my 88" SIIa with parabolic springs it was very noticable. Resolved to military 109 shocks up front and disco rear shocks for the rears.
    Reducing friction does improve the ride though.

  6. #6
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AV8R View Post
    The friction is part of the shock absorbing system. Less friction in the springs means stiffer shock absorbers. After replacing my original springs on my 88" SIIa with parabolic springs it was very noticable. Resolved to military 109 shocks up front and disco rear shocks for the rears.
    Reducing friction does improve the ride though.
    Less friction compared to what is the question. Remember that the original suspension design envisaged smooth, non-rusty suspension leaves. Damping levels for any suspension are always a compromise anyway.

    But the reduction in friction from lubricating springs is nowhere near as great as that for parabolics, where there is virtually no frictional damping.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    20
    Total Downloaded
    0
    True. The few leaves on the parabolics hardly touch each other.

  8. #8
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AV8R View Post
    True. The few leaves on the parabolics hardly touch each other.
    Usually only at the tip of the leaves, with a nylon or other non-friction pad.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    20
    Total Downloaded
    0
    But they are comfy ! With the proper dampers of course.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    409
    Total Downloaded
    0
    (Reading older threads relevant to what I'm currently doing, and because it's too hot to do much more at the moment!)...


    The main issue about painting leaf springs seems to revolve around the concept that if the paint wears off (as it will in time) then the thickness of the springs is reduced which results in the centre bolt becoming loose. On the face of it this seems valid, except that the middle of the spring where it is held by the centre bolt AND the U bolts will never see any movement, so why would the paint wear off?

    However, assuming for the sake of argument that the concern is valid then why not simply leave the middle 6 inches of the springs bare, and paint the remainder?

    Almost as intriguing is the concept that oil and grease will actually damage the spring, not through gathering dirt and becoming a grinding paste as is often suggested, but through a chemical reaction between the steel and the oil. This suggestion, which I read on the technical advice pages of one of the "better" custom spring manufacturers in the US, is apparently based on changes in both oil and steel compositions and treatments over the last few decades.

    Then I read a "how to" that suggested sandblasting the springs. I'm not sure if that's a good idea, as sandblasting results in a surface with millions of little stress raisers which might encourage the propagation of cracks? Perhaps bead blasting, leaving a smooth compressed surface, might be better, but that would reduce paint adhesion!

    With so many contradictory opinions, I guess we just pick whatever appeals to us and go with it....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!