Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Holden Power? Pros v Cons

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Holden Power? Pros v Cons

    Hi all,
    Apologies if this has been covered, but what are the general pros and cons of holden conversions in Series rovers vs original 4 cly vs original Rover 6 cyl?
    I've been on the lookout for a series land rover 109", and up until now I've been dismissing any with an engine conversion, however by doing so i may have missed out on some opportunities.. in particular, some with the conversions seem to be in good shape/better maintained than original ones, particularly in my price range.

    I intend to use it just for cruising around town, occasional trips from Brisbane to the Gold Coast or sunshine coast, and occasional light towing (300kg surf rowing boat + trailer)

    Are the holden engines more suited to this kind of use?
    easier/harder to live with etc?


    Thanks in advance
    Josh

  2. #2
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If There are a lot out there still running around happily on Holden conversions. If you consider one, look for an engineers report or evidence of it being registered in your home state previously with that engine - check the engine number and your state roads authority to make sure it’s legal. Most are and we’re done before engineers reports were needed so are ok but worth checking.

    Like any engine, check it’s condition like you would any other - these vehicles are no spring chickens. Same goes for gearboxes - the bigger Holden 6’s can overpower the gearbox and gearbox issues are not uncommon on converted units.

    Towing a small trailer like you want would be no dramas.

    I’m sure others will give you their thoughts too - good and bad. 😉
    Last edited by Homestar; 19th March 2019 at 08:52 AM.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One of the reasons there are a lot of Holden powered series Land Rovers about is because it was the installation of the Holden donk that kept the vehicle alive, otherwise it would have ended up scrapped along with the original motor. The original donks are good if you want to stick with originality, but if you are doing lots of kays, and want to cruise at highway speeds when you are on main roads, then a Holden or Ford powered vehicle is a good choice. You will also get better fuel economy, but if you don't, you will definitely get where you are going sooner. With a Holden or Ford six cylinder conversion, a good option is to fit either higher ratio diffs, a high ratio transfer case, or a good quality overdrive like the "Roamerdrive" unit. Another good option would be to pick up one with the "Marks 4WD Conversions" Nissan Cabstar 4 or 5 speed gearbox conversion, coupled to a Holden six, but there are not a lot of these about. There are options for diesel conversions into series Land Rovers too, but to me, they just bring to mind a similar reason why old Plumbers/Tank Builders all suffer with hearing impairment.

    Good luck with your selection.

    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Holden engines were fitted to Series Landrovers mainly because they were an engine that was widely available, cheap, and parts readily available and cheap. (None of these really apply today) They also gave a useful increase in power, particularly for a vehicle with a tired engine that was going to be more expensive to overhaul.

    As against these advantages, the Holden engine usually needed higher gearing as they are less happy at high revs than the Rover engine. A further disadvantage is that the necessary chassis modifications to accommodate the six may end up being more expensive than expected, especially if today's engineering is needed. The bell housing adaptors to fit the gearbox to the Holden engine are not always made with sufficient accuracy, and this rather than the increased power is the reason for gearbox failures with Holden conversions.

    If used for serious off roading the Holden engines can suffer from oil and carburettor issues on steep slopes.

    Because there are several ways of arranging the clutch, until you have had it apart, you will not know what parts to get, and even then, you may need to find a supplier that recognises the bits.

    The Rover six is a somewhat different case. The Holden engine fits with less problems, and parts for the six are getting hard to find and expensive. So it is probably a better option for vehicles that were originally sixes, although 'original' sixes are getting fairly rare, so becoming worth keeping that way.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What a great lot of info - thanks very much guys.
    I think that in the past I had been lead to believe that LRs with conversions were to be avoided - good to clear that one up.
    On with the search.

    I'm sure I'll have more questions - thanks again gents
    Josh

    EDIT: I suppose the next question is: do you know of any 109" series rovers, with either original 4- or 6- cyl, OR Ford/Holden 6 cyl engines currently available (Or Stage 1 V8 if I'm allowed to dream)?

    Josh

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have no personal experience of Holden conversions, but I remember hearing a lot of stories about badly aligned adaptors and overheating problems.

    In the 1980s, I bought 4cyl motor for my Series III from a farmer who had replaced the original motor with a Holden engine.

    I can't recall exactly what the problem was, but he had to have the engine out three times before the problem was sorted.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have to disagree with Mick88 and agree with a bit with JDNSW.

    My experience is that I put a reconditioned 161 in a series 1 (86) and a little later blew up a 2.25 in a series 3 and had that engine rebuilt. I drove the series 1 as my everyday driver for about 7 years and the series 3 about 4 years after the series 1 had been sold on. I covered regular long distances in both vehicles.

    Overall the performance of the engines was similar but in some areas a bit different.

    The Holden had better acceleration but lower effective cruising speed (will explain) - fuel consumption was about the same. When in its rev range it had better overtaking but when over its redline it didn't have much.

    Overall the 2.25 was nicer to drive as it revs easier than the Holden could cruise at an bit higher speed - the Holden runs out of revs and starts to bounce valves but if you push the Holden through this, both have about the same top speed but the Holden is screaming even though it has more power (gives acceleration not top speed). The 2.25 is far more comfortable at around 100kph.

    Ok with standard gearing I definitely would go the LR 2.25 - however the major fault with the Holden is that standard gearing has it operating ouside its comfort zone - change the gearing so it is not overrevving at highway speeds then you can use its higher power.

    I have no experience with this but if you change gearing I would go the Holden engine. Options are diffs, overdrive (helps the 2.25 as well) or a 5 speed box like the Nissan Cabstar box.

    Over arching this is - originality. Now Holden engines are part of the LR History in Australia and if a car has one it is no big issue but in my view to pull a 2.25 out of a car now to put in a Holden engine is not necessarily a good move.

    Just some my thoughts to consider.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    993
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    One of the reasons there are a lot of Holden powered series Land Rovers about is because it was the installation of the Holden donk that kept the vehicle alive, otherwise it would have ended up scrapped along with the original motor. The original donks are good if you want to stick with originality, but if you are doing lots of kays, and want cruise at highway speeds when you are on main roads, then a Holden or Ford powered vehicle is a good choice. You will also get better fuel economy, but if you don't, you will definitely get where you are going sooner. With a Holden or Ford six cylinder conversion, a good option is to fit either higher ratio diffs, a high ratio transfer case, or a good quality overdrive like the "Roamerdrive" unit. Another good option would be to pick up one with the "Marks 4WD Conversions" Nissan Cabstar 4 or 5 speed gearbox conversion, coupled to a Holden six, but there are not a lot of these about. There are options for diesel conversions into series Land Rovers too, but to me, they just bring to mind a similar reason why old Plumbers/Tank Builders all suffer with hearing impairment.

    Good luck with your selection.

    Cheers, Mick.
    Mick you refer to high ratio Diffs as a better option with Holden conversions, I have two 2as in my back yard that I'm rebuilding (one Holden conversion one Land Rover 2.25)at the moment I'm addressing chassis rust issues but they are stripped down.
    To my untrained eye all the Diffs centres look the same, they are removed from axle housings
    what should I look for to distinguish high ratio from standard,if indeed PO made this mod

    Cheers Paul

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bemm52 View Post
    Mick you refer to high ratio Diffs as a better option with Holden conversions, I have two 2as in my back yard that I'm rebuilding (one Holden conversion one Land Rover 2.25)at the moment I'm addressing chassis rust issues but they are stripped down.
    To my untrained eye all the Diffs centres look the same, they are removed from axle housings
    what should I look for to distinguish high ratio from standard,if indeed PO made this mod

    Cheers Paul
    Count the crown wheel teeth and pinion teeth , then divide ,
    4.7 = Original series diff , 3.54 = RRC diff. some aftermarket were 4.1



    Putting high ratio diffs in a Holden Powered Landy makes it even worse than it already is in Low Range . They don't have any low down torque & 3.54 makes them abysmal.

  10. #10
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If the diff centres are out - really easy; just count the teeth on the crown wheel and pinion. The ratio is the crown wheel teeth divided by the pinion teeth.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!