Search is your friend Vlad... fairly sure wide vs skinny debate has been done a good couple thousand times
I am currently running 235/85 R 16 BFG MT’s on my Defender 130.
I like these tyres a lot.
Now I am considering what to replace them with when the time comes, and my question is:
Are wider tyres better ?
My choice then is 235/85 R16 OR 265/75 R 16.
These are almost exactly the same rolling diameter, but with a 3 cm wider tread in the latter case.
What would be the pros / cons of each option ?
The following tools allow a direct comparison of various tyre sizes.
Side by side - Metric
http://www.kouki.co.uk/utilities/visual-tyre-size-calculator
Overlay – Metric / Imperial
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
Of course, I’d rather have taller tyres (285’s – 33”) but as they wouldn’t be legal, and it’s a big investment, I want to stick with legal; tyre size.
I am not interested in any debate on brands etc – I’ll be sticking with the BFG’s but I am interested in the pros / cons of a wider tyre.
and yes I am aware of these threads.
265/75 or 235/85 Wrangler MTR's
What is better for 109: 235/85 or 265/75 ?
Thanks.
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
Search is your friend Vlad... fairly sure wide vs skinny debate has been done a good couple thousand times
FOX 2008 RRS - Artemis 1989 Perentie FFR - Phoenix S2a 88" with more - Beetlejuice 1956 S1 86" - GCLRO #001 - REMLR #176
EVL '96 Defender 110 - Emerald '63 2a Ambulance 112-221 - Christine '93 Rangy - Van '98 Rangy - Rachael '76 S3 GS - Special '70 S2a GS - Miss B '86 Rangy - RAAF Tactical 200184 & 200168
Vlad.........do we really need another tyre thread
have you clicked on the good oil lately
If you fit wider tyres on existing rims you would increase your turning circle. A big consideration in a 130 I'd think.
Pity you are not in Adelaide, 'cause I could lend you a set of 265/75s to try. I don't like them and have gone back to 235/85 for my Defender.
The wider tyres made the steering heavier and "deader". The whole car felt less lively and slower to respond with the wider tyres. Maybe the extra weight gave it that feeling - don't know - but the standard General Grabbers (on alloys) and the Michelin XZYs (on Wolf steelies) both feel better than the 265/75s.
Don't reckon I got any further in sand with the wide tyres than the standard ones.
That's my 2 cents worth
David
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
FWIW - Stick with the 235/85. I just bought some BFG MT KM2's and very happy with them.
Those are the ones I'll be gettng to replace my old pattern MT's - how much did you have to pay for them.
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
Mate - personally the higher profile the better for all off road including sand. I know what you are saying able wanting to stay legal, but why dont you make some equiries about when Qld is signing up to the National Code that will allow you (should anyway from memory) the taller sizes that you are after...if it just round the corner (and they have been saying for ages it is but who knows) you might be able to hold off...
Cheers
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks