Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Puma power??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Puma power??

    Spoke to a guy with a 2.2puma powered ford ranger and he wasnt happy with it felt under powered. What are the puma guys opinions I'm yet to test drive one as I know I'll buy a defender shortly after and after that I'll be broke and divorced .
    But seriously are they under powered has any one had experience with chip and exhaust mods ?

    Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,780
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Isn't the 2.2 supposed to be more powerful than the 2.4? I don't find my bog-standard 2.4l 130 to be under-powered. I suppose it's a matter of what you want from it. If I'd wanted a racing car I wouldn't have bought a Defender. Being a small motor with a turbo, it doesn't have heaps of power straight off idle, but the 6-speed box means you can drive it in an RPM range that produces good power.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The
    2.4 130is exactly what I want but havnt test drove one yet . What is your fuel range and consumption? Would u consider power chips etc any issues so far?
    Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I traded a 2.4 on a 2.2. Power output is nearly the same, but the 2.2 is much smoother.

    By defender standards the 2.2 flies. But depending what you compare it to it will be under powered or over powered. It's all in the comparison.

    The 2.2 feels nice to drive - and has sufficient power for just about any situation except perhaps drag racing. But then you'd buy a different car for that. The power is more than sufficient for off roading etc.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,780
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by squidsd1 View Post
    The
    2.4 130is exactly what I want but havnt test drove one yet . What is your fuel range and consumption? Would u consider power chips etc any issues so far?
    Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app
    Fuel consumption is about 9 km per litre, was getting close to 10 but having the roof rack on has knocked it a bit. I think my Long-Ranger tank is 120 litre, but the warning light comes on at 95-100l, must drain it one day and see how much reserve i have. I'm happy with the power, have spent money on driveline upgrades (diif locks, axles & CVs, double-cardan front shaft), better spent than trying to make a racing car out of it IMO. Only issue I have had was check-engine lamp coming on frequently, haven't seen it since replacing the MAP sensor 13,000km ago.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Jandakot, Western Australia
    Posts
    343
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I reckon the 2.2 is fine, I can keep up with the flow of traffic quite comfortably, can sit on 110 on the open road and it's geared really well for off-roading as well. What more could you want from a defender, I think it's great!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All defenders are underpowered for the size of the vehicle but I don't mind me 2.2 it is fairly nice to drive however the computer is a pain at times as it has a bad delay and holds revs at certain rpm's....the fuel economy on mine isn't to crash hot however I do have 285's,roof basket and a steel tray...I do not have a tune as of yet I do have a straight threw exhaust which made a tad of difference

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    tasmania
    Posts
    40
    Total Downloaded
    0

    lightwing

    I had my 09 Puma chipped by Bruce Davis in Sydney. Goes really well and gets good fuel consumption. 10k per liter most of the time. I have had better under ideal conditions.
    As for performance I couldn't ask for more I am very pleased with it. 110-130 on the freeway is no problem and overtaking is no problem.
    Before the chip remap it was pretty good, now it's very good

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    newcastle
    Posts
    411
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you compare it to any 3 liter toyota or 3.2 liter Ford then it's got nothing on those 2 motors. But it's not underpowered for what it's meant for. I always wish I had more power but that doesn't mean I'm not happy with the 2.2. It just means I'm greedy.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    121
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ford Ranger feels really underpowered with the 2.2, it feels like the 100 hp version of the 2.5 liters Hilux, you can wait an eternity to feel how it responds. In part its due to a "longer" gearbox ratios and other part because you hope to feel more grunt from an updated pick up.

    The Defender is a different car, more a commercial truck than a daily commuter. Here in Colombia is a common step to use the 3.5 and 5.0 Isuzu diesel in Chevrolet Silverado (originally powered by Chevy 350) trucks. Believe me, they feel heavily underpowered, that response is not what you expect from that car. Once you put those engines in a Defender or in a commercial truck, you think they can make the world collapse using their torque figures.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!