Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: New engine - 2.4 'Puma'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    330
    Total Downloaded
    0

    New engine - 2.4 'Puma'

    Trying to figure the economics of a rebuild vs new engine.

    For $7,000 fitted (plus $400 extra for new clutch) I can get a Transit Mk7 140 Ps engine. According to this seller - they have supplied several of these engines to replace the 2.4 Puma donk in the Defender.

    I've seen this posted on another forum:
    Defender Puma 2.4L engine can be replaced by Transit Mk7 engine provided it is a 140 Ps.The reason for this is the Defender Puma like the 115 and 140 is the higher spec Puma block with the oil cooling jets.The variable geometry turbo on the Defender and the high spec Transit is the same,along with injectors,starter motor,water pump,vac pump,EGR Valve etc.
    The difference come in the form of the flywheel,the Defender engine was always supplied with a solid mass flywheel whereas the Transit came with a DMF (Dual Mass Flywheel).There is also a slight difference in the shape of the sump.
    Has anyone here been down this route - any potential pitfalls?

    '11 Def 130 "Henry"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I haven't "been down that road", but I think I've heard that the Puma version of the Transit engine has different internals more suitable to conditions that may be encountered by 4WD vehicles.
    Pickles.

  3. #3
    sheerluck Guest
    Pickles, it's the sump and baffling (along with the ladder frame/stiffener) that is different between Transit and Defender based engines.

    I've found reference to "seals" being different as well, but cannot work out which seals from their pictures.

    If it's a long bare engine, everything else that is Land Rover specific will be swapped over.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That is cheap Possibly cheaper than your other option

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Great Southern Land
    Posts
    1,076
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Has anyone removed & resealed their sump successfully before ?

    The reason I ask is that the oil pump recall (2.2 Puma) replaced the sump - I thought because the removal proccess bent it out of tollerance or the like. Must be strong sealant !

    Anyway, you might have to factor in the cost of a new sump.

    Cheers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So they are charging you $500 to do the fitting, thats cheap. Consider they have to remove old engine, strip all the ancillaries and fit them to the new engine then install said new engine.

    There must be bloody good mark up on the engine itself to do the install for that amount.

    Overall to the OP... I dont think you are going to get a better deal than that.

    Regards
    Daz

    P.S It would seem, having a quick look around, a Transit engine of the correct spec is anywhere from $2300 AU - $4500 AU, so even accounting for shipping its why the seller is doing the install for $500
    Last edited by DazzaTD5; 25th June 2016 at 11:32 AM. Reason: more info
    Regards
    Daz


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LR V8 View Post
    Has anyone removed & resealed their sump successfully before ?

    The reason I ask is that the oil pump recall (2.2 Puma) replaced the sump - I thought because the removal proccess bent it out of tollerance or the like. Must be strong sealant !

    Anyway, you might have to factor in the cost of a new sump.

    Cheers.
    Thats correct, the sump gets damaged on removal.

    Regards
    Daz
    Regards
    Daz


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    At any cost its still a kick in the guts for a fairly new vehicle with low klms.

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using AULRO mobile app
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    At any cost its still a kick in the guts for a fairly new vehicle with low klms.

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using AULRO mobile app
    True enough but not as big a kick as D3 / RRS owners that need a new engine...

    Regards
    Daz
    Regards
    Daz


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Richmond, NSW
    Posts
    867
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I was informed at last year's Land Rover Expo, by the chap doing the new models show, that the new Ford Ranger engine bolts straight into the 2.4 TDCi spot in the Defender.


    It might be another option for you, although I daresay the cost would be greater. It's apparently a very good engine....so I've heard. I haven't seen the figures on it.
    Bobby


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!