Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 76

Thread: 3.9 V8i intake manifold

  1. #31
    steve_35 Guest

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They can be bought
    That's what I was talking about, but didn't think I was skilled enough to make.
    Added benefit of cooler manifold in theory.
    Regards Philip A

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am in the process of oredering one of those. Hopefully next time I am home from work I can fit it and see if there is a "seat of the pants" difference.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What ever you do if it made 1/2 HP difference it would be unbelievable,. Try dropping the mufflers off, more noise equals more power !!! That will work well in the seat of the Pants department !!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Showing your ignorance there. HP is power, I am looking at torque.

    Already have lots of noise.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Is that right BigJon , my ignorance ? Tell you what , Send me your Heads and Ill have ported to 390HP Potential , ill fit one my Crower grind Cams and your measely 180HP engine will now develop 280HP , (300HP with the right injectors/Tune) with 40% more torque at 2500 RPM and absolutely eat any standard 4.6. Cost ?
    $2000 for the Head job / manifold Cut and shut , and Cam . Standard procedure for "Port Choked" engines like any of the Rover V8's
    Now Bigjon , Im sure you aware of the basic Formula
    Horsepower = Torque x RPM divided by 5252 Yeah ???
    Then simply Torque = Horsepower s RPM divided by 5252 Yeah ?
    So indeed , it is you who is the ignorant one , as quite clearly there is direct relationship between the two .
    Basically for you , you cant make the engine develop more Torque , all you can do is shift where the torque is spread in relationship to RPM .

  7. #37
    steve_35 Guest
    Dam 2000 for a headjob i have lived in the country to long

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ah , steve 35 , theres Head Jobs and there are head Jobs . Wha tdo you reckon a new set of stainless Valves (Up to 1.8 inlets !!!) , Inserts , springs,locks, Newen CNC Valve seats , heads shaved ,all Cost ? and thats just parts and machining ! Then theres the actual porting , pre and Post Flow benching , Porting the inlet manifold . Theres a Huge difference between a real head job and theb Junk most serve up as scratching around in the heads .

    PS , most of the heads I get done ,are done in SYD-A-KNEE , a quaint little country town !!!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Is that right BigJon , my ignorance ? Tell you what , Send me your Heads and Ill have ported to 390HP Potential , ill fit one my Crower grind Cams and your measely 180HP engine will now develop 280HP , (300HP with the right injectors/Tune) with 40% more torque at 2500 RPM and absolutely eat any standard 4.6. Cost ?
    $2000 for the Head job / manifold Cut and shut , and Cam . Standard procedure for "Port Choked" engines like any of the Rover V8's
    Now Bigjon , Im sure you aware of the basic Formula
    Horsepower = Torque x RPM divided by 5252 Yeah ???
    Then simply Torque = Horsepower s RPM divided by 5252 Yeah ?
    So indeed , it is you who is the ignorant one , as quite clearly there is direct relationship between the two .
    Basically for you , you cant make the engine develop more Torque , all you can do is shift where the torque is spread in relationship to RPM .
    Sigh...

    Lots of words there.

    My initial post details my thoughts. I am not trying to increase torque for free. I am interested in shifting my torque curve lower in the rev range.

    You get wound up very easily.

    PS.. If I send you my heads where will you fit the cam?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJon View Post
    Sigh...

    Lots of words there.

    My initial post details my thoughts. I am not trying to increase torque for free. I am interested in shifting my torque curve lower in the rev range.

    You get wound up very easily.

    PS.. If I send you my heads where will you fit the cam?
    You won't be disapointed with the 4.6 manifold. before i fitted it, the 3.5 made nothing below 3500 rpm, now it works the same at 2600 rpm all the way to valve bounce heaven (5500 rpm ish). (still got nothing below 2600)

    bang for buck it would poo all over head work, valves, cam etc. All those things are great but will make stuff all difference at low revs.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!