Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: are these industrial engines suitable for automotive use?

  1. 4th February 2011, 09:31 PM #11
    pibby
    pibby is offline Master Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    tasmania
    Posts
    391
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, I really am behind the times. I’m amazed at the outputs from these diesels. Always been impressed with the 2.7 tdv6 but it is a premium product (ie big $$$). The ranger and d-max aren’t premium by any measure. You could probably walk into a wrecker and get a low k engine and loom for $5k. saw a 2009 ranger 2.5l diesel 21k on motor for $12k, 2wd.

    These new diesels have amazing fuel economy. the isuzu manual crew cabs have combined l/100km of 8.4. down to 7.2 on open road. they wouldn't be too far behind the weight of a D1.



    These figures are for the isuzu d-max.

    Isuzu 4JJ1-TC Hi-Power
    Description: 3.0 litre turbo-diesel, in-line 4-cylinder, DOHC, 16-valve
    Maximum torque: 360 Nm @ 1800 —> 2800 rpm (manual)
    333 Nm @ 1600 —> 3200 rpm (automatic)
    Maximum power: 120 kW @ 3600 rpm
    Bore x stroke: 95.4 mm x 104.9 mm
    Displacement: 2999 cc
    Compression ratio: 17.5 : 1



    these are for the ranger :

    Type: 2.5-liter DOHC in-line four-cylinder, four valves per cylinder, common-rail electronic injection, turbocharged diesel with intercooler
    Capacity:2499cc
    Bore:93mm
    Stroke:92mm
    Compression:18.0:1
    Fueliesel
    Max Power:105kW @ 3500rpm (EEC)
    Max Torque:330Nm @ 1800rpm (EEC)


    Type: 3.0-liter DOHC in-line four-cylinder, four valves per cylinder, common-rail electronic injection, turbocharged diesel with intercooler
    Capacity:2953cc
    Bore:96mm
    Stroke:102mm
    Compression:18.0:1
    Fueliesel
    Max Power:115kW @ 3200rpm (EEC)
    Max Torque:380Nm @ 1800rpm (EEC)

    This is without mentioning the 3.2 dura torq which has 147 kw and 470 nm which is coming in the ranger.

    As I said, I really am behind the times. These are big numbers. I am hard pressed to believe these cars actually reflect these numbers in their performance on the road. Puts my 4.6 to shame which I reckon has got plenty of go and tows 2-3 ton beautifully. These newer diesels must feel like race cars!

    Or do these numbers not tell the real story?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 4th February 2011, 10:22 PM #12
    Blknight.aus's Avatar
    Blknight.aus
    Blknight.aus is offline RoverLord Vendor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,499
    Total Downloaded
    0
    they dont tell the real story....

    think of it like a news report. mostly its accurate but theres always a few caveates you dont get to see.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 5th February 2011, 12:09 AM #13
    LOVEMYRANGIE's Avatar
    LOVEMYRANGIE
    LOVEMYRANGIE is offline YarnMaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    And yet if I took to one inside my house with the baseball bat I keep behind the front door, they would get away Scott free and probably get a payout too.....


    Sent from my backyard TeePee using smoke signals.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 5th February 2011, 12:18 PM #14
    pibby
    pibby is offline Master Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    tasmania
    Posts
    391
    Total Downloaded
    0


    ps - had to do this dodgy bros insert as an image as all column would go out of whack and become unreadable.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 5th February 2011, 01:45 PM #15
    luke68's Avatar
    luke68
    luke68 is offline Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Emerald, Vic
    Posts
    258
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wiki? Do you really believe everything from them! According to Official LANDROVER the 300TDI is 83KW and 265nm. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe the 3ltr Izuzu is the best replacement for the TDI?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 5th February 2011, 01:53 PM #16
    LOVEMYRANGIE's Avatar
    LOVEMYRANGIE
    LOVEMYRANGIE is offline YarnMaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LOVEMYRANGIE View Post
    And yet if I took to one inside my house with the baseball bat I keep behind the front door, they would get away Scott free and probably get a payout too.....


    Sent from my backyard TeePee using smoke signals.
    WTF???? This was supposed to be in a different thread...........
    No wonder I couldn't find it!!!!


    Sent from my backyard TeePee using smoke signals.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 5th February 2011, 01:56 PM #17
    Quarks's Avatar
    Quarks
    Quarks is offline Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wallumatta, NSW
    Posts
    829
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I wondered if the wind had drifted!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 5th February 2011, 02:46 PM #18
    isuzutoo-eh's Avatar
    isuzutoo-eh
    isuzutoo-eh is offline TopicToaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Near Seven Hills, Sydney
    Posts
    4,342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by luke68 View Post
    Wiki? Do you really believe everything from them! According to Official LANDROVER the 300TDI is 83KW and 265nm. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe the 3ltr Izuzu is the best replacement for the TDI?
    Hi Luke,
    There are too different specs for the 300tdi, the disco was higher rated than the Defender at the time. 83KW is correct for the Defender spec.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 5th February 2011, 04:26 PM #19
    disco2hse's Avatar
    disco2hse
    disco2hse is offline ChatterBox Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    2,278
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LOVEMYRANGIE View Post
    WTF???? This was supposed to be in a different thread...........
    No wonder I couldn't find it!!!!


    Sent from my backyard TeePee using smoke signals.
    No worries. Just thought you were having a `moment.'

    You should be more concerned that no one said anything
    Alan
    2005 Disco 2 HSE
    1983 Series III Stage 1 V8
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 5th February 2011, 04:31 PM #20
    LOVEMYRANGIE's Avatar
    LOVEMYRANGIE
    LOVEMYRANGIE is offline YarnMaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by disco2hse View Post
    No worries. Just thought you were having a `moment.'

    You should be more concerned that no one said anything
    I'm used to being ignored..... Just ask my kids....


    Sent from my backyard TeePee using smoke signals.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
« Researching a RR re-power. | grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Search AULRO.com ONLY!
 Search All the Web!