35-36'' tyres legal on Series vehicles or not?

You don't get too many decent tyres in those sizes for under $500.

Wayne

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LowRanger

Yes Bill,my headlight height is fine,and the body has had the necessary mods to allow fitment of the 35's,BUT the legal fitting of fitting larger tyres to certain models,just because they are fitted to another model by the same manufacturer isn't allowed,as I mentioned earlier,even without a compliance plate,which didn't come into effect in Australia till 1st August 1971,it will be on a model by model basis,not make by make.And a series 2 or 3 FC is not the same model as a series 2 or 3 109.And there were no options for a 110 or Defender.

Wayne

---

But, as Diana has said above, a military series 3 (in particular) is in almost every particular equivalent to the 1-ton which ran 9.00/16 tyres. Take advantage of the factory option 35 inch tyres and who could object? The vehicles left the factory engineered for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scrambler

But, as Diana has said above, a military series 3 (in particular) is in almost every particular equivalent to the 1-ton which ran 9.00/16 tyres. Take advantage of the factory option 35 inch tyres and who could object? The vehicles left the factory engineered for them.

---

The 35s were not an option - they were standard only on the 109 One Tonners and they had a different axles setup to standard 109s - mil 109s are different again and did not have the 900/16 option as far as I know.

Garry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JDNSW

My Series 2a owners manual only lists 9.00x16 for the FC, but my Series 3 manual lists it as an option for all 109s. I'm pretty certain it was not an option for Series 1.

The Series 2a/3 Optional Equipment parts book lists wheels for 9.00x16 sand tyres for all models, as well as regular tyres for the One Ton.

John

---

If it is listed for all models then your covered for all models I would have thought:)

Sorry Garry, your argument concerning 1 ton axles doesn't wash, especially considering current 1 tonners have reverted back to standard Rover type diffs.
About 9 years ago I built and had a hybrid engineered on Q78s (36'') after proving to the engineer with part numbers that the equivelant size were fitted to the Shorland Armoured Car in the UK, which although weighing around 4 tons, still had the standard swivel housings,spindles, hubs and brakes.On fully floating axles these are the important components that concern the engineers, not how strong the diff/halfshaft components are.
And before anyone chimes in to say that TSL Q78s are not DOT approved, The bloke I built the hybrid for obtained sufficient technical information from Interco the tyre maker to convince the engineer otherwise.
Wagoo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by THE BOOGER

If it is listed for all models then your covered for all models I would have thought:)

---

I stand corrected. :o

Garry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wagoo

Sorry Garry, your argument concerning 1 ton axles doesn't wash, especially considering current 1 tonners have reverted back to standard Rover type diffs.

---

What do you mean by current 1 tonners - (Defenders etc???) I thought we were talking about series vehicle 1 tonners I thought they have either env or sals front diffs. Were there any series 3 one tonners with rover front diffs?

Garry

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by garrycol

What do you mean by current 1 tonners - (Defenders etc???) I thought we were talking about series vehicle 1 tonners I thought they have either env or sals front diffs. Were there any series 3 one tonners with rover front diffs?

Garry

---

According to the parts book, one tonners had the Rover diff from September 1974. The ENV was only on Series 2a; earlier Series 3 and late Series 2a had Salisbury.

John

Another point of note for series 2a ex militiary Aussie landies with cut away guards.
The cut away guards were done for two reasons.
1/ to improve access to the tyres to clean off mud.
2/ Improve body clearence for 900x 16 tyres.

The series 2a Aussie Military landies have taller suspension that stock just for 900x16s and I beleive the forward control 2a/b landies ran the the same chassis , or a extremely close copy of it and they run 900x 16.

In pracitice the military 2as never ran 900x16 as it was not needed for for most duties and the landies broke more than enough axle shafts with standard rubber in army drivers hands.
The fitting of 900x16 to the Aust army 2a landys was developed for the ambulance version and thing were carried though to the other versions for interchangeablity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 101 Ron

Another point of note for series 2a ex militiary Aussie landies with cut away guards.
The cut away guards were done for two reasons.
1/ to improve access to the tyres to clean off mud.
2/ Improve body clearence for 900x 16 tyres.

The series 2a Aussie Military landies have taller suspension that stock just for 900x16s and I beleive the forward control 2a/b landies ran the the same chassis , or a extremely close copy of it and they run 900x 16.

In pracitice the military 2as never ran 900x16 as it was not needed for for most duties and the landies broke more than enough axle shafts with standard rubber in army drivers hands.
The fitting of 900x16 to the Aust army 2a landys was developed for the ambulance version and thing were carried though to the other versions for interchangeablity.

---

I believe the Aus military LWB vehicles shared the same chassis as the British counterparts, and AFAIK only the British LRDG vehicles were fitted with 9.00s, what is the story behind the Aus SWB military vehicles?Their chassis with deeper spring hangers and shackles were unique to Australia. Was it originally intended that they also be fitted with 9.00x16s?
As a side note, it is a shame that Rover didn't promote ENV diffs as standard on at least military contracts. and why didn't the military insist on them anyway?
Wagoo.