
Originally Posted by
rick130
Frank, as you've said in Vlad's thread you've never bent a standard tie rod but plenty of us have, and when you compare the size LR use to, say a GU Patrol it's minuscule and not fit for purpose IMO.
In about '02 Nissan upped the size of the arms again to at a guess >32mm (and also changed to female tie rod ends)
When I first bought the 130 ten years ago the very first parts I bought were a tie rod and drag link (as well as a pair of axles and drive flanges) from Mal and Paula Story to replace the standard rods.
Mine was bent and jamming in the silly channel under the diff.
I was aware that this was a problem and went looking for it after being advised to either make my own large diameter ones or buy some Maxi ones by my mate Mark who was an ex-JRA and LRA engineer.
All the Perenties built at JRA Moorebank had HD large diameter steering arms.
He said that Solihull wouldn't believe there was a problem with the standard ones, then, when they had a few too many bend in the UK they came up with, in his words the pathetic aluminium channel under the diff.
His old 110 had over half a million km on it when he sold it and it had OS steering arms that he'd made by cutting the ends off the stock ones and sleeving them with large OD tube.
BTW, a split tube and clamp holding the tie rod is preferable to a jam nut as it doesn't fatigue stress the thread near as badly.
The jam nut concentrates the loads at the root of only one to two threads whereas the split clamp spreads the load over more area, increasing fatigue life, so LR did one thing right compared to a lot of other vehicles.
Tony Southgate, the designer of the all conquering TWR XJR-9 and 12 Le Mans Jags in the late eighties/early nineties bucked the motor racing industry trend (we all used jam nuts, even aircraft do) and made split clamps for their cars as they had to survive a 24hr race while clobbering ripple strips the whole time.
Bookmarks