Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 255

Thread: My 4.6 V8 Rebuild Thread

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift View Post
    The D2 already has a very low max torque rpm,,
    going to a 4.6 with the standard cam should give you, what 20% (?) more at the same revs,, 9.1 should bump the other up too,,
    how many revs at 100kph Gary?
    Somewhere around 3200rpm. You are right about the increase in torque just by going to a 4.6. Low down the 3.5 has more than enough with the 101 low gearing so I am not too worried about the lower end but mid range need to be better - again a standard 4.6 will provide this but more will be better. I am not after higher speed as on the flat the 3.5 will pull it faster than the chassis really wants to go but it just has to see a gentle hill and it dies in fourth and to a lesser extent third - slow down enough to get into second then it just pulls like a train.

    So an increase in mid range torque is what I want.



    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    An aftermarket cam might just be a bit harder and last a bit longer to.
    After Phillip's thread a while back about his issues with a new cam I also had this in the back of my mind. Though the 4.0 cam (I think the same as a standard 4.6) I have has just been run in and is in great condition.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When I pulled my 4.0 it was fairly shagged out and the cam (I know it was at least it's second by receipts in 180,000k's) was equally shagged. Some lobes were no higher than the bearing surfaces.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The 4.0 engine I have had only done 40,000km and was only scrapped because of an over torqued head bolt stripping the block thread. I probably could have simply reassembled the engine after the block repair but I want to make sure there are no other issues.

    Cheers

    garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have just had a Crow tow (their mid level) cam installed. I will let you know how it goes but the mechanic reckons it goes harder than a stock One (its got some head work too) and torque is up can short shift with no probs and she pulls... Eg first to third.

    Cheers

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    When I pulled my 4.0 it was fairly shagged out and the cam (I know it was at least it's second by receipts in 180,000k's) was equally shagged. Some lobes were no higher than the bearing surfaces.
    My cam at 200 000 was sweet but I wanted extra grunt. Mobil 1 for most of warranty then from 100k Penrite hpr 10.

    Cheers

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    I have just had a Crow tow (their mid level) cam installed. I will let you know how it goes but the mechanic reckons it goes harder than a stock One (its got some head work too) and torque is up can short shift with no probs and she pulls... Eg first to third.

    Cheers
    Thanks - what head work did you get done. The engine builder indicated that he thought the valves in the Rover V8 were a little small for a 4.6 so when I get to the heads I will need to have a look at what mods I need.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Basics only mate - chemical clean, new inserts, ported exhaust and intake ports to match the gaskets.

    Cheers

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's a big job (in the scope of things you are planning) to machine out to replace with bigger valves. I'd be looking at some options of off the shelf stuff available.

    Sorry, re your other question about Mark Adams, he's on here as user, Mark Adams. Can't exactly remember his website but I think it's Tornado Systems or something similar. He chips D2's and has a lot of knowledge in the tuning dept.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am not really up on things like valves etc so I will look into it a bit closer when I get to it. The heads I have really do not need any work other than cleaning up and maybe port matching - if work is difficult for little gain I will not get it done but if easy then I may do.

    I will look up Mark on here.

    Thanks

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah lots of work vs gain and it really needs to be part of a bigger upgrade path if induction. Such as inlet, larger MAF (or elimination), cams, valves, exhaust.

    The V8's they ran in the grp A 3500's had little if any actual valve work. I know they are smaller but as a comparison the Toyota 1UZ (4.0) runs same set up in that, the 4.7 and larger. I went to the maximum lift and duration that could be done within the scope of machining the original heads for lobe clearance and spring capacity (added about 6-7mm to the tip of the lobe in weld) and still used the stock valves and they weren't the restrictive area of the intake.

Page 11 of 26 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!