Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: load = ride comfort = what spring rate?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    That's very light. My rangie is ~1130kg rear and rides well with 180lb springs. Currently I have 240 lb/in fitted for a towing job two years ago. They ride a bit harsher than ideal but they carry load well.
    You're looking t ~20% lighter than those to get similar results.
    Dougal,

    do you have a Load leveller, and is it working?

    whats your front rate and front weight?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Dougal,

    do you have a Load leveller, and is it working?

    whats your front rate and front weight?
    Yes and I think so, but it is 27 years old. Fronts are 180 lb/in, front half weighed ~1170kg back when I weighed it.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    1170kg, pretty good considering the Isuzu.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    1170kg, pretty good considering the Isuzu.
    Yeah, unloaded only 20kg over max axle weight.

    But I've now got an alloy gearbox bellhousing, it's probably only 12kg over now.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Where is the front pulley in relation to the front axle centerline?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Where is the front pulley in relation to the front axle centerline?
    My solidworks model thinks they are about 40mm apart. It looks more than that in the metal, but I guess it's just another illusion.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Forward or rearward.....bloody 300TDi

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Forward or rearward.....bloody 300TDi
    Err, sideways. To the left.

    Fore/aft it's ~75mm clear of the front cross-member, which is something like 290mm forward of the line between the two front shock turrets.
    That is the front of the second crank pulley that drives the AC belt. It's ~22mm less if you don't have that one.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Hey all,

    My 98 110 tray back has a short cut down alloy tray, the vehicle is minimalist type set up. I run 250lb springs in the rear. I find the ride a little harsh. The other day I had 150kg of steel (2m lengths from head board to hanging over rear of tray a little) behind driver. The ride was much more what I like and am after.

    Can anyone hazard a guess as to what spring rate I would go down to, to give a similar ride unloaded?

    Yes I am aware it will affect loaded ride, but Im looking to install my load leveller for that..
    IMHO the ride you felt with the heavier load can be replicated by changing the spring rate to achieve the same natural frequency.

    Natural frequency is proportional to square root (spring rate / weight)

    From this you can determine the required spring rate knowing the rate of your current springs and the weight on the springs when you were loaded and normal.

    i.e. sqrt(K1/W1) = sqrt(K2/W2) where:
    K1 is your current spring rate
    K2 is the rate that you want for better ride with normal load
    W1 is the weight on the spring when you were loaded
    W2 is your normal load

    The natural frequency (normally measured in Hz which is cycles per second) for rear springs should be a little less than that for the front springs. This is because the front wheels hit the bump before the rears but you want the motion caused by each to finish at close to the same time - obviously different speed and wheel base affect this.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    so weight on springs is unsprung mass....that would be my 940kg rear axle weight, less:
    the complete axle assembly,
    half the TA's,
    half the Aframe'
    half the prop-shaft
    springs.

    The +150kg load I had on the tray, was pretty much centered over the rear axle for and aft. That being, say 900mm forward and 900mm rearward. The tray only having 2 load points to chassis, these being at the same ends as the load. 900mm froward and rearward of axle center.

    How much of that 150kg would be "on" the rear axle, and how much would have been picked up by the front?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!