Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: TD5 manual or automatic

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Northern Tasmania
    Posts
    143
    Total Downloaded
    0

    TD5 manual or automatic

    My old 81 Rangie has finally died of rust and gearbox problems, not to mention the rest. The replacement will probably be a new Disco TD5 (Also looking at Prado (Shame)). Good used vehicle appear to be too expensive. All the dealers are trying to push me to go automatic, but my natural instinct was for manual. Data would sujest the manual has about 10% better fuel economy. Is this correct? What would be easiest to eventually trade?.
    It will mainly be used for road use, and light duty 4x4 where the clearance and approach - departure angles are required. I don't have a strong preference either way. What do you think? Thanks..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,338
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I used to be a manual only person, but since I have gone with autos I have never turned back, and autos are better for resale
    Series 11A ex Air Force
    1995 ES Discovery TDI


    RIP 2006 Discovery 3
    RIP 2004 V8 Discovery
    RIP 95 Discovery TDI

    RIP 1999 Freelander
    RIP 1978 EX Army FFR

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Autos are easier to drive offroad, simply because they are unlikely to stall and you can left-foot brake. On the open road, once the torque convertor locks up you'll probably even beat a manual for fuel economy.

    Go the auto.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Redcliffe, QLD
    Posts
    60
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Greg-g,

    AUTO all the way mate!!

    The ZF auto gearbox is very well matched to the Td5 and is the pick of the transmissions for all forms of driving - 4wd, towing, city driving. It helps keep the turbo engine spinning smack bang in the middle of its power band so making it so much more driveable than the manual.

    With the inclusion of Hill Decent Control on Disco IIs, it allows the auto models to travel as slowly as the manuals down hills when off road.

    Good luck.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've not used HDC, but understand it relies on braking downhill. Therefore it is inferior to the overdriving the brakes technique which is the correct way to descend steep hills in autos. I also believe that HDC has a minimum speed of 7kmph? Which is too quick for my liking.

    cheers

  6. #6
    RichardK is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    2,955
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, when the better half suggested (around 10 years ago) we trade the ser111 and her toyo..... in to buy a Rangie I thought RIPPER!!! but she added it had to be auto.....now at that time being full of testosterone I could only believe that REAL men drove manual 4wds. 8O 8O

    I thought I could disguise myself to save embarrasment in case anybody saw me driving an auto in a 4wd situation. ops: ops:

    I now say that an auto is the only way to go, I have much more control of the vehicle in any 4wd situation and she (the RR) doesn't have the forces going through the drivetrain that I have seen some manuals go through in difficult situations. ........ and perhaps my testosterone level is lower :roll: :roll:

    ....and the wife is happy..... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img] :
    RichardK

    Series IV Matrix Offroad Camper following our Discovery 3 with E Diff, BAS Remap, Mitch Hitch, Uniden UHF, Codan NGT HF, Masten TPMS, Proquip Compressor Guard, ARB Winch Bar, Milemarker Hydraulic Winch, 4x4 Intelligence Rear Wheel Carrier, VMS GPS with Rear Camera,

  7. #7
    Goblin Guest
    Just watch the early Series II disco's. They don't have the CDL. The sII upgrades (easily spotted by the newer headlamp cluster) do have the CDL and most of the earlier ones can be retro-fitted, but not all.
    Without CDL the TC only sII disco's do struggle. I've seen it numerous times.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agree about the CDL (centre diff lock, not to be confused with cross-axle lockers). To see what difference it makes, drive a Defender or Discovery with the centre diff open. The traction control works much harder and the vehicle is simply considerably less capable. Why LR did that in the Discovery S2 is beyond me, but they did.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Northern Tasmania
    Posts
    143
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi
    Thanks for your help
    I'm now the proud owner of a new TD5 Auto Discovery Classic Town with 16" Alloy Wheels.
    I don't know why anyone would want 18" Alloys. They ride harder, and I suspect the rims and tyres would be far more suseptiable to damage.
    The Leather seats and park distance control are very nice.

    Thanks again
    greg

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Congratulations!

    You're right about the 18" alloys, no use for offroading at all. But they look better (apparently) and improve on-road handling (apparently).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!