Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Reverse Cut Ring & Pinion / aka High Pinion - front Rover diff

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Reverse Cut Ring & Pinion / aka High Pinion - front Rover diff

    Could someone please school me on high pinion vs low pinion?

    To my understanding in a 2001 Defender 110 at least, both the front and rear diffs have a 'low pinion' set up from the factory (front Rover diff and rear Salisbury).

    From what i have read, it is common to swap the gearing in the front diff to "high pinion", aka reverse cut, as it is supposedly stronger (in the front).

    Now, the place i bought the reverse cut ring and pinion from says it is a direct replacement to the stock 3.54 ring and pinion.

    I currently have my 110 in a shop with the diffs all pulled apart and they rang me up and said that i have incorrectly ordered a "high pinion" front R&P when it should be a low pinion, but i specifically ordered the reverse cut for the front.

    Anyway - should a reverse cut ring an pinion go in without modification to a Rover diff as advertised, or am i missing something here...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Reverse cut refers to the type of cut on the crown wheel and pinion. It's used on the front diff so that when driving the load side of the gear teeth are loaded rather than the coast side. The Rover type diff in the front is a spiral bevel type, so the pinion is centralised in its height rather than being low or high. The rear being a Salisbury is a hypoid design diff which is a low pinion setup. Short of installing replacement entire diffs, you can't change it between high and low pinion or with spiral bevel.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Slunnie... have a look at this link... Coil Sprung - Diff Gearing

    I have the 4.14 reverse cut...

    So i assume this is simply a spiral bevel reverse cut and nothing to to with high/low... i think the shop is using the wrong terminology here....

    I have the 4.11 normal cut for the rear sals.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    They're the right gears you're after, but that's not to comment on combining 4.14 and 4.11. The reverse direction is in relation to the cut of the gear rather than the direction that it drives the gear in. If you look at the crown wheel of the reverse cut 4.14 and compare that to the normal cut on the crown wheel pictured above it you will see what I mean. The pinion is cut in the other direction to match also.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah it should work... cut and paste from the same link:

    ...Here is an example, a 4.10, 4.11,4.12 and a 4.14 ratios are all interchangable but there is a considerable difference in durability between these four gears.

    4.10 (10X41) 41 tooth ring gear

    4.11 (9X37) 37 tooth ring gear

    4.12 (8X33) 33 tooth ring gear

    4.14 (7X29) 29 tooth ring gear


    Here is the approximate durability increases (shock loading) as calculated by Gleason Corporation.

    4.10 to 4.14 +30%

    4.11 to 4.14 +20%

    4.12 to 4.14 +10%


    I'm going to pop down there tomorrow morning to see it with my own eyes, i think they might assume that it will not work, as typically reverse cut hypoid gears are high pinion, which isn't applicable to the Rover diff

    I'll report back tomorrow...

  6. #6
    Davo is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,595
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    They're the right gears you're after, but that's not to comment on combining 4.14 and 4.11. The reverse direction is in relation to the cut of the gear rather than the direction that it drives the gear in. If you look at the crown wheel of the reverse cut 4.14 and compare that to the normal cut on the crown wheel pictured above it you will see what I mean. The pinion is cut in the other direction to match also.
    I can't see that working out too well.
    At any given point in time, somewhere in the world someone is working on a Land-Rover.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    They're the right gears you're after, but that's not to comment on combining 4.14 and 4.11. The reverse direction is in relation to the cut of the gear rather than the direction that it drives the gear in. If you look at the crown wheel of the reverse cut 4.14 and compare that to the normal cut on the crown wheel pictured above it you will see what I mean. The pinion is cut in the other direction to match also.
    Ahhh now i see what you mean, it's the cut / bevel in the gear is on the opposite side compared to the stock front 3.54... now it makes more sense.

    Not sure why they refer to it on the link as 'reverse rotation' as there isn't anything being reversed!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Davo View Post
    I can't see that working out too well.
    Refer post above.. the 4.11 is a 37 tooth and the 4.14 is a 29 tooth... the 29 tooth is chunkier / spaced further apart to make up the difference in the tooth count. At least i bloody hope it does, otherwise i'll be looking for a front 4.11 tomorrow morning!!!!!

  9. #9
    Tombie Guest
    The variation whilst small won't work out well for you!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    308
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    The variation whilst small won't work out well for you!
    OK... thanks for the input, but could someone please explain why this is the case?

    If both ring and pinions cover the same distance in rotation over a different quantity of teeth, why does this pose a problem?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!