Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: LT95 Transfer Thrust Muncher

  1. #11
    captainslow Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    but have you checked that the bore of the intermediate shaft is clear of debris?
    Philip, yes I'd checked that and all the radial and axial holes were clear. However it does raise another issue. I've got two intermediate shafts to choose from (see below). They're both not perfect but the hardening is still intact. At the Low Range gear end of the shaft (where I have the problem) one of the shafts has a ring milled around the entire circumference however the other only has a slot. So there has obviously been a bit of evolution of the shafts. Anyone know which is the latest and best to use?


  2. #12
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I haven't seen one like that before. It look like someone has milled it themselves probably to increase the oil flow around the rear thrust on low gear. Assemble the gears etc on the shaft and have a look where the groove is in relation to the rear thrusts. Might be worth giving it a go if you intend staying with the steel thrusts.
    Cheers......Brian
    1985 110 V8 County
    1998 110 Perentie GS Cargo 6X6 ARN 202516 (Brutus)

  3. #13
    captainslow Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Bearman View Post
    I haven't seen one like that before.
    Yes, that shaft is a bit weird. It looks like it was manufactured that way - it seems to have a hardened surface. But when positioned in the box the slot lines up nicely with the Internal Spacer washer - which can easily fall into the slot. So not sure how this ever worked. It's possible that the Internal Spacer washer wore itself into the shaft - but it's an amazingly neat job if it did and can't have ended well - another mystery...

    BTW, this shaft was not used in the current failure. For reference, here's what it looks like in-situ...

    Last edited by captainslow; 17th April 2016 at 06:10 PM. Reason: added more info

  4. #14
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by captainslow View Post
    Yes, that shaft is a bit weird. It looks like it was manufactured that way - it seems to have a hardened surface. But when positioned in the box the slot lines up nicely with the Internal Spacer washer - which can easily fall into the slot. So not sure how this ever worked. It's possible that the Internal Spacer washer wore itself into the shaft - but it's an amazingly neat job if it did and can't have ended well - another mystery...

    BTW, this shaft was not used in the current failure. For reference, here's what it looks like in-situ...

    When you think about it, the internal spacer can't fall into the slot because it is captured by the outer thrust washer that it fits into, so what it's doing is allowing a bigger space for oil to accumulate. Not a bad idea really.
    Cheers......Brian
    1985 110 V8 County
    1998 110 Perentie GS Cargo 6X6 ARN 202516 (Brutus)

  5. #15
    captainslow Guest
    Well, had a short note back from Britpart...

    "Thank you for your email, we have checked our stock to a genuine LR one and both are steel"

    I'm a bit surprised, every thrust washer I've seen is bronze. Can anyone confirm (or otherwise) if their statement is correct?

    Cheers
    Peter

  6. #16
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Likewise, I have mainly seen bronze, but on a couple of occasions have seen bronze ones with white metal covering like big end shells. I have never seen full steel ones like you have.
    Cheers......Brian
    1985 110 V8 County
    1998 110 Perentie GS Cargo 6X6 ARN 202516 (Brutus)

  7. #17
    captainslow Guest
    An update on the LT95 thrust washers:-

    Britpart have confirmed that their thrust washers are actually zinc plated bronze. This is good and what I would have expected.

    I was pretty certain that the thrust washers I was supplied came in Britpart packaging, but I could be mistaken so I will chase up the suppliers (Craddocks in the UK) to see if I can confirm who is supplying their fully steel thrust washers.

    In the mean time I've done some superficial gear contact tests (see below). The drive gear and high range gear seem to be meshing right in the middle where you would expect. So I think this rules out any misalignment issues.

    I'll be rebuilding the transfer case with bronze thrust washers (and a new low range gear) and I'll keep a close eye on it for a while until I can get some confidence back...





    Cheers
    Pete

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    210
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Pete,

    Glad you have made progress.

    The gear marking compound show nice contact between the gears so another possible cause eliminated. Maybe for "piece of mind" what about checking the low range gear set as well when you get new thrusts?.
    Interesting that aftermarket has a cheaper thrust made from steel that clearly hasn't been tested in real life!!! and will fail with the wrong oil. (Recon your not the only one that's had this problem.)

    For a number of years now I always measure and inspect critical parts for correct size and tolerance for my Series 2a. When there is a difference between after market and the original part I buy a genuine part to compare and measure. When genuine and original are the same I buy genuine if it available.!!!!

    Excellent thread and pic's for future reference!!!.

    Chris

  9. #19
    captainslow Guest
    Well, thanks to Brian I now have a replacement low range gear, pear washers and BRONZE thrust washers installed into the transfer case and should hopefully have Sandy back on the road by the weekend. With the box still in the car it's a tricky job on your back with bits falling in your face, but certainly doable.



    Still no luck getting any response from the supplier about the source of the steel thrust washers - in fact I've had no response at all to several emails which is a bit disappointing so I'll follow up with a phone call.

    Chris, I took your advice and finished off the gear contact checks by testing the Low Range gear and it looks pretty good. Certainly worth checking. Here's the results for completeness...





    Cheers
    Pete

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    210
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Pete,

    Good feeling to have it all back together!!!!. Fortunately you have a low parts count on this failure. It could have been much worse!!!!
    (Also very interesting the part supplier has gone quite.)
    OK on the contact tests on Low range. Last thing to eliminate. I always remember my TAFE teacher saying "If you haven't measured it, IT"S WRONG until you do"
    Now it's back to L/R original spec. you only have to monitor the thrust wear over time.
    Probably the bottom lines is how hard you drive it. If it becomes an issue again maybe as already suggested a TRB shaft setup.
    Chris

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!