Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Early or Late Disco 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Daisy Hill Queensland
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Early or Late Disco 2

    What (apart from lights, trim and price) are the main differences between an early 99-01, mid 01-02 and late 03-04 Discos.

    I have been looking around now for a while and I have found that they seem to change prices acording to the years as set above.

    I know that the 03-04 model had the greatest trim look change, but did they do anything under the body. Apart from the CDL.

    01-02 brought back the S, SE and SE7 and from what i can gather lost the accuator for the CDL. (now I have to crawl under cars to look)

    I have seen the 99-00 models as low as 16K (but high milage) and the 03-04 are still selling for nearly their new price.

    Can anyone point out what to look for, the good and bad points for the years and how reliable they are compaired to the earlier models.

    Thanks

    Danny
    :TakeABow:LAND ROVER

    Don't Follow Me, I'm in a "Land Rover", You WON'T make it.

    aut viam inveniam aut faciam

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well you have answered your own question in your post, thats all the changes :wink: i think the ECU was changed in the later models 01 on.

    But thats about it.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  3. #3
    ATLandy Guest
    Hi ,

    03 -04 DII have a shorter front bumper ' valance ' for better approach angle and no oil pump bolt problem .

    Ta

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The D2 update also has much better door seals. They don't leak water like the earlier D2.
    Stereo controls are on the steering wheel.
    Much much better sound proofing
    Much firmer seats
    Obviously the CDL which you mentioned


    There were a few Disco's made in 01 & 02 which did not even have the internals for the CDL in the transfer case so with these you cannot even add CDL on later. Important to watch for as the Disco is useless off-road without CDL.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nowra, NSW
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [quote=walker]the Disco is <span style="color:red">useless</span>

    Thems fighting words 8O

    I have no problem in my '02 Disco without CDL, except when compared to Discos with the CDL and Defenders. Without it and relying on TC only, it is still better than many other (read Jap Crap) 4x4s. I would not call it "useless", but perhaps label it "less capable" :wink:

    And adding a few internals to the transfer case, or exchanging transfer case will allow fitment of a CDL to these models. Priced around $1000 last time I asked. Haven't got around to it, as I mainly use the V8i for play days.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No, I would definatley say useless and even dangerous.

    It depends where you drive it. On road and sand it is probably ok, but as soon as you get it on rutted steep tracks, it gets cross axeled and will not go anywhere. And really a Cruiser, Patrol or Prado will easily beat it. And with no CDL it is actually dangerous to back down a steep hill, the way the TC and ABS work leaves you with no control and is the reason LR put the CDL back in.
    On many (anything more than easy) LROCV trips, you are only allowed to go if you have CDL.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nowra, NSW
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Have you driven one? As I said, really haven't had any problems with it, and Yalwal is basically my backyard, ruts and hills goes OK. Yes, I drive it differently to my other vehicles, but I don't find I get stuck any more than in the others, and less then some of my friends with other makes. You learn to live with it, and drive accordingly. Cars aren't dangerous, but drivers are :wink:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland (Australia)
    Posts
    1,461
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Originally posted by ATLandy
    Hi ,

    03 -04 DII have a shorter front bumper ' valance ' for better approach angle <span style="color:red">and no oil pump bolt problem </span>.

    Ta
    ouch ..... that's below the belt ops:

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Originally posted by Lucy
    Have you driven one? Cars aren't dangerous, but drivers are :wink:
    He owns one, drives harder than most, which is to the equal of and beyond Yalwal and contributes significanlty to a Disco2 specific chat group.

    Try a stalled failed ascent on a greasy hill wihout CDL. :wink:
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nowra, NSW
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    His sig says he's got an '04, we are talking '01-'02. According to him they are vastly different. Having experience in vehicles with and without the CDL, yes there is a difference, but I wouldn't characterise those vehicles without it (the CDL) as dangerous or useless. As I said before, just "less capable.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!