-
27th April 2006, 01:55 PM
#21
Originally posted by Quiggers
I definitely need a tune. Today's top up was 68 litres for 380ks which at $1.25 / litre was about $800000000000.........
Cheers, GQ
I've told you a million times not to exaggerate !!!
Scott
-
4th May 2006, 09:28 PM
#22
How time flies eh, guys? Posted a quick note two weeks ago and jibed about the juice costing $1.25. Two weeks later and another 10 cents dearer, make that $90000000000! no exagggggeration, Scousie!
Digressing, there must be some poor bastards getting seriously knocked around by these prices, judging by what's being 'dumped' on ebay. I think I saw a 96 D1 V8 two days ago which appeared quite okay for just $5000. Geeeeeeeezzzzzz!!! and there are plenty more for not much.....glad I'm not selling.
Cheers, GQ
-
4th May 2006, 10:14 PM
#23
I just noticed your post title: Fuel Economy 3.5 V8
I thought those words ween't allowed in the same sentence
-
5th May 2006, 12:53 AM
#24
Fuel Economy - 3.5 V8
Hi All,
Interesting thread here as I am now the proud owner of 1981 RR
3.5 V8 Auto stock standard (motor wise).
What would you look at changing to improve fuel comsumption.
I was thinking of gas conversion but the mob that converted my D1 V8i
say they cannot fit it to RR because of the twin strongberg set up not
that I want to spend that sort of money at this time.
Will be changing points & plugs (this weekend) and taking it to local
mechanic who services and does repair does work for local car yard
that sells Landrovers /Disco's on regular basis.
Want them to tune carb's and check timing.
So would appreciate feed back as to modifications I should be looking
at
Cheers
Baggy
-
5th May 2006, 02:27 PM
#25
Hi
Not that I want to recommend Jeeps in this website (considering I just bought an 86 EFI rangie) but a while ago I was looking at them and came across this guy
http://www.go.jeep-xj.info/
he has spent a lot of time trying to improve the power and economy of his xj cherokee and when I last chatted to him he reckoned he was down to a consistent 12 l/100k highway (from 16) and about 16 around town (as well as up from 130 odd KW to 165kw at last check!!)
Look at the engine and driveline modifications section and check out the info on the manifold swap. Does anyone know if this might work on RR - ie 3.9 manifold on a 3.5? Are they the same size/fit?
I don't know myself, only just started looking at options for my project. At the moment I'm tossing up between an injected or carbed 4.4 (I have cheap access to a rebuilt one) or just stick with a rebuilt 3.5 that came with the car and try to make that more efficient. I'll ask q's about that later.
Cheers
Mango
-
6th May 2006, 07:32 AM
#26
Originally posted by mango
I don't know myself, only just started looking at options for my project. At the moment I'm tossing up between an injected or carbed 4.4 (I have cheap access to a rebuilt one) or just stick with a rebuilt 3.5 that came with the car and try to make that more efficient. I'll ask q's about that later.
I've got a 79 Rangie with a 4.4. It has SUs not Strombergs (no diaphragm), and I run it 99.9% of the time on gas.
It gets 19L/100K on gas and about 17L/100K on petrol.
At 48c/L that's good economy.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
|
Search All the Web!
|
Bookmarks