Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Td5 overboost issue

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I came across this from sierraferry posted on here back in 2015, which sounds very similar to what I have experienced and looking at the old log the air flow reading was reaching these limits. Hopefully new batch of data will provide answers.

    "I'll tell you only what i know for sure:

    1. that high air flow fault code is often thrown by the stage 2 remap as the suction is too hard under hard throttle and the air flow reading goes above 650kg/h when the ECM cuts fueling similar like on overboost, you need a live data session with tester to see if it's so before you spend on new sensor but if you want to replace the sensor anyway there is one which can handle better this problem: BMW Mass Air Flow Meter Sensor 5WK9605 5WK9608 5WK96050Z 13621432356 | eBay , (tested it on my own car and friend's auto and it makes a difference), it's perfect fit but it has a wider reading curve though it might not override the cut-off at much higher air flows, the perfect cure for this issue would be an addapted remap to handle the greater air flow reading but if you dont want that you need a voltage clamp on the MAF input to ECM, similar like the boost box to not let the reading exceed 650 even if it's higher... not the best way exactly like boost boxes but it's working(i dont recommend this way even though it works)"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Universe A
    Posts
    2,645
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A couple of things to note....

    Without comparing both ECU tunes with accompanying logs, it's almost impossible to ascertain exactly what is going on, although a faultcode can be pretty conclusive.

    If the car originally came with an MSB ECU then it is an EU2 engine, this means that it will definitely not be a MAF related error... But only IF the NNN tune is also EU2.

    If it's not then the "overboost" is probably the least of your worries.

    Let's just say the correct tune has been provided by the tuner for that engine version, if it has then the only reasons for any kind of boost cut related issue will be to do with either:

    1. Boost levels going beyond whatever the tuner has set.

    2. Boost levels going beyond what your specific sensor can actually do.

    3. Sensor incorrectly calibrated.

    If it's MAF related, you've got the wrong tune installed.

    If you post a log from a nanocom Evo, leave it in .csv format.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,480
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yep, new data required, the sensors don't usually take too long when they start to fail.

    That previous info relates to old type tuning, as I mentioned before, the MAF should be rescaled with new tuning to accept higher air flow though I only saw a max figure of 624 on the old log ( which, if you were running the MSB ECU at the time wouldn't have given you the symptoms as the MSB doesn't use the MAF in fuelling calcs)
    However, the highest actual reading on the old type tuning on a NNN ECU was 675 before cut.

    As an aside, I did note being on the verge of over boosting at the 74 second mark.

    Of course once again, this all depends on

    1: If the Tune file you have purchased is the modern tuning method
    2: If yes then they should have rescaled the parameters ( usually around 800max for MAF and 1.6bar if using the stock MAP sensor ).

    Probably all very confusing, in short, if you get new data and you observe the airflow on the Nanocom going from high 600's to zero while using the NNN ECU on full noise, that means A: that is the cause of your issue and B: The Tuner didn't rescale the MAF ( new method ) Ditto above 1.42 bar boost.

    Tomorrow

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,480
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Writing ( with interruptions of course ) while you posted James

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post
    Yep, new data required, the sensors don't usually take too long when they start to fail.

    That previous info relates to old type tuning, as I mentioned before, the MAF should be rescaled with new tuning to accept higher air flow though I only saw a max figure of 624 on the old log ( which, if you were running the MSB ECU at the time wouldn't have given you the symptoms as the MSB doesn't use the MAF in fuelling calcs)
    However, the highest actual reading on the old type tuning on a NNN ECU was 675 before cut.

    As an aside, I did note being on the verge of over boosting at the 74 second mark.

    Of course once again, this all depends on

    1: If the Tune file you have purchased is the modern tuning method
    2: If yes then they should have rescaled the parameters ( usually around 800max for MAF and 1.6bar if using the stock MAP sensor ).

    Probably all very confusing, in short, if you get new data and you observe the airflow on the Nanocom going from high 600's to zero while using the NNN ECU on full noise, that means A: that is the cause of your issue and B: The Tuner didn't rescale the MAF ( new method ) Ditto above 1.42 bar boost.

    Tomorrow
    Confusing, yes. But get the gist of it. Fault code is 20,2 Overboosting.

    STAGE1MSB.CSV
    STAGE2NNN.CSV

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,480
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discopete View Post
    Confusing, yes. But get the gist of it. Fault code is 20,2 Overboosting.

    STAGE1MSB.CSV
    STAGE2NNN.CSV
    I'm going to say MAP sensor related.
    If there was no overboost faults when you first installed the tune, then try changing the sensor.
    However, if it has faulted since installing, the tuner may not have calibrated the sensor correctly, or it's out of range as James has mentioned.

    Send the log to Storm and ask them if they can fix it.

    Edit, If you need to buy a new MAP sensor, especially if going to VGT, get this one and have it calibrated, they are a direct fit 4 bar sensor ( Shack can do it if storm can't )
    Bosch 0281002316 Pressure / Temperature Sensor | Automotive Superstore

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post
    I'm going to say MAP sensor related.
    If there was no overboost faults when you first installed the tune, then try changing the sensor.
    However, if it has faulted since installing, the tuner may not have calibrated the sensor correctly, or it's out of range as James has mentioned.

    Send the log to Storm and ask them if they can fix it.
    Definitely faulted with new tune. I'll see what Storm have to say and provide any updates/resolutions.
    Much appreciate the help you guys have provided.

    Peter

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post

    Edit, If you need to buy a new MAP sensor, especially if going to VGT, get this one and have it calibrated, they are a direct fit 4 bar sensor ( Shack can do it if storm can't )
    Bosch 0281002316 Pressure / Temperature Sensor | Automotive Superstore
    Will do. Thanks again.

    Peter

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!