I would be going for the 'big jerry can' system. Whilst having redundancy in case of a damaged fuel tank sounds nice, if you were to chart a risk-control matrix I think you would find that the frequency and severity of a fuel tank failure would not justify the complexity; in any case, you would still have a reserve of fuel in your aux tank so could deal with a problem should one occur.
A transfer pump to top up the main tank as required works very well. I did many outback miles with a '88 Rangie with two 40-litre sill tanks transferring to a 25 litre running tank (vehicle had an LPG conversion with LPG tanks in place of the original petrol tank) and the system worked very well (unless I forgot the transfer pump was on and tried to pump 40 litres into the 25 litre tank!).
I'm not conversant with the P38 system, but on the earlier EFI models, the pipe that suspended the in-tank pump was prone to failure in corrugated conditions, this problem is avoided by an externally-mounted pump, which, with minor cobbling, could be made to draw from the auxilliary if the main tank was holed.
I think that tapping the vent line from the aux tank into the main tank would be sufficient connection to the evaporative emissions system.


also in case of a damaged tank/pump I would be dumping fuel where I do not want it. I don't even know how much fuel gets returned? Adding valves to switch between supply could be augmented with valves to switch between return lines as well, though my design treats the fuel return line as a breather hose as well if need be I could add a third connection to the second tank to accommodate. What bothers me somewhat there is that I would need to have physical valves place somewhere, not being inside the car, so I would have to get out of the car to switch over. There are electric valves available but they have very tiny ports and seem to restrict flow a bit, not sure if that would cause trouble.
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks