Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: How well does a good 3.5 V8 go in a 110?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0

    How well does a good 3.5 V8 go in a 110?

    My 110 is currently fitted with a twin carbed 3.5 ex range rover and LT95 Compression is down a bit on a few cyls ie a couple about 90-110 and the rest around 140-150 psi but it runs OK. The 110 is also fitted with RR x/fer gears so its doing about 2650 rpm @100km/h with 7.50 R16 tyres - appx 31". Its fitted with a set of extractors and electronic ignition .
    I feel this gearing is a bit tall for the motor - it seems happier in 3rd around town than 4th

    Its also now about 200kg lighter than a standard County wagon as I've converted it to a styleside ute using a tub from a Defender hardtop and a Defender ute cab.

    There are a few options I'm considering:
    1. Returning to standard 110 x/fer gearing - appx 3200 rpm @ 100km/h
    2. and/or top end rebuild with new cam shaft

    I dont need a rocket but I want it to cruise easily on the highway and have reasonable pickup - is a 3.5 going to be happy cruising at 3200-3300 rpm? I know everyone has different opinions on whats adequate but basically I dont want it to feel 'gutless'.

    I dont really have any experience with a fresh 3.5 and would like opinions on whether I'm likely to be happy with this or if I should consider:
    3. Fitting a 3.9i ex Disco - basically is this going to give that much more power to justify the extra $$$$$ and the fitting hassles than a fresh 3.5 with the right gearing? (probably couldnt afford to rebuild it so would be the best second hand 3.9 I could find)
    4. Am also considering sourcing a 4.4 ex P76 but have heard warnings about overheating from several sources. Again, probably couldnt afford to rebuild it after sourcing it, so would be looking for the best one I could find.
    Last edited by mark2; 23rd January 2007 at 08:48 PM. Reason: spelling

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go the 3.9 option or bigger the 3.9 has heaps more power than a 3.5 , you will notice the difference no probs

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Geez, your revs at 100klm/h sound excessive, I've got a 4L in a 93 Disco with 4.11 diffs with 33's and it is pulling around 2250rpm at 100klm/h, I'm assuming your top gear is an overdrive, Regards Frank.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gilderoy, Victoria
    Posts
    1,810
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'll swap you an LT77/LT230 from my 110 (ex rangie) for your LT95.
    Cheers

    Mick

    1999 Land Rover 110 Defender TD5 Cab Chassis
    1985 Land Rover 110 County 4.6 EFI V8
    1993 Track Trailer camper

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    Geez, your revs at 100klm/h sound excessive, I've got a 4L in a 93 Disco with 4.11 diffs with 33's and it is pulling around 2250rpm at 100klm/h, I'm assuming your top gear is an overdrive, Regards Frank.
    No, its a 4 speed manual box and 4th is not an overdrive.
    Your Disco x/fer gearing, overdrive top and tyre size, would account for the difference.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Godwin Beach Qld
    Posts
    8,688
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Mark2
    Sounds like your 3.5 is just in need of a cam and some lifters, that will probably restore a lot of the life, on the cyls that are down if there is no compression loss from leaking valves, it could be that the valves are not opening enough,(cam-lifters) muddy has just replaced his 3.5 "Tired" with a low Klm 3.5 and it is a different vehicle, Lt95, O/drive on gas, full roofrack, fridge, and spares. Over the "Gateway"bridge in Brisvagas in top at 90+ kliks, used to struggle in top and looking for 3rd I would say go the Cam and Lifters first, you will notice a big difference.

    cheers

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleHo View Post
    G'day Mark2
    Sounds like your 3.5 is just in need of a cam and some lifters, that will probably restore a lot of the life, on the cyls that are down if there is no compression loss from leaking valves, it could be that the valves are not opening enough,(cam-lifters) muddy has just replaced his 3.5 "Tired" with a low Klm 3.5 and it is a different vehicle, Lt95, O/drive on gas, full roofrack, fridge, and spares. Over the "Gateway"bridge in Brisvagas in top at 90+ kliks, used to struggle in top and looking for 3rd I would say go the Cam and Lifters first, you will notice a big difference.

    cheers
    Now this is what I want to hear! If a 3.5 in good condition will do the job adequately, I'm more than happy to keep it, even if a 3.9i has a fair bit more power.
    Any thoughts on the optimal gearing for a 3.5 in a 110? Early rangies with the 4 speed manual (28" tyres) were doing about 2900 @ 100km/h. Seems like a lot but standard 110 gearing with the 4 speed box was 3100 rpm at the same speed. Should I restore the original gearing to improve driveability?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 3.5 in BUB91 seems happiest in fifth over 3000,,
    no lack of power, sings along,
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast Hinterland
    Posts
    566
    Total Downloaded
    0

    3.5 motor

    mark
    send you a PM
    Maurice

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,575
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had a 3.5 110 County LT95 on gas and it was quite happy at 110km/h in 4th. (Just as happy as my Td5 in 5th, and quieter). Used to set off in 2nd too, only used 1st offroad or starting on hills.

    Replaced it with a 3.9 when it blew (at 300,000km) which had a bit more torque but wasn't hugely different.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!