Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Defender rims

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Christchurch NZ
    Posts
    1,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i have Disco alloys on my 110. date stamp 1993 max load 850 KG.
    1995 Defender 110 300TDI :D
    1954 86" Series 1 Automatic :eek:
    Ex '66 109" flat deck, '82 109" 3 door, '89 110 CSW V8, '74 Range Rover, '66 88" soft top, '78 88" soft top, '95 Disco ES V8, '88 Surf, '90 Surf, '84 V8 Surf, '91 Vitara.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbo110 View Post
    i have Disco alloys on my 110. date stamp 1993 max load 850 KG.
    Great Info!!! The disco steel rims would have to be built as strong or stronger.

    So 1700kg per axle and 3400kg overall. EDIT - 130 max laden weight is just over at 3500kg. But should be fine for everything else...
    Last edited by isuzurover; 23rd February 2007 at 08:50 PM.

  3. #13
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interestingly if you look in Microcat LR EPC the Disco rims (NTC5193MUE) are listed as parts against a Defender.

    I got given 2 Disco rims the other week . Now I just have to find 4 more
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  4. #14
    tombraider Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Great Info!!! The disco steel rims would have to be built as strong or stronger.

    So 1700kg per axle and 3400kg overall. EDIT - 130 max laden weight is just over at 3500kg. But should be fine for everything else...
    Would explain why LRA offer Defender 110 with Boost Alloy (was a disco wheel) and the 130 with steelies only.

    For the record, my TX1s are rated at 1400kg EACH.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    im with you ben and I stand to be corrected if need be

    another problem that neither yourself or john has thought of what about after market wheels or modified wheels i have both and they dont have a load rating on them

    i even took my car when i bought it to get it assessed by the insurance company and i had modified 15" rims on the Defender and not a word was said about wheels
    a disco towing rate is the same as a Defender as well if i remember right

    also the military wheels on my Defender dont have a load rating ?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    108
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wovenrovings View Post
    Just wondering are any of the defender steel rims able to be used with tubeless tyres? The rims on my 120" are rivetted and so need tubes. Would be nice to run tubeless. Other option is disco rims of course.
    I have been wondering this EXACT same thing this very day as I just got an unexplained flat in one of the tubed steelies on my 130.

    So if the steelies on a 130 can't be used for tubeless what do folk on here recommend? I had been planning to get the tubes taken out and running my Coopers tubeless until local two tyre places refused to do it today

    I am busy with various little projects getting the beast ready for a Sydney LROC double crossing trip of the Simpson. Do people feel that tubed LR steelies for/on a laden 130 represent too much hassle for potential punctures & repairs or would they be OK?

    Everyone knows they are strong wheels but if I can't run tubeless what would people recommend to be at least as strong and better? Did I forget to mention that I don't have a bottomless pit of money?

    Cheers,
    Cameron

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld.
    Posts
    632
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ok so it seems that the general opinion is that 110/county steelies will hold the air but don't have the retaining ridge in the bead which you are supposed to have to run tubeless. Also disco rims are probably strong enough but legality it in debate.

    Is the idea of the bead to keep the seal on the bead at low pressures or hard cornering.
    84' 120" ute - 3.9 isuzu.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wovenrovings View Post
    Ok so it seems that the general opinion is that 110/county steelies will hold the air but don't have the retaining ridge in the bead which you are supposed to have to run tubeless. Also disco rims are probably strong enough but legality it in debate.

    Is the idea of the bead to keep the seal on the bead at low pressures or hard cornering.
    I think you will find it is called a safety bead and yes it helps to keep tubeless tyres in place

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    615
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by wovenrovings View Post
    Ok so it seems that the general opinion is that 110/county steelies will hold the air but don't have the retaining ridge in the bead which you are supposed to have to run tubeless. Also disco rims are probably strong enough but legality it in debate.

    Is the idea of the bead to keep the seal on the bead at low pressures or hard cornering.
    As I've ALWAYS understood it, these beads on the rim is what makes the rim what they used to call [in the mid sixties, when they became compulsory( suppsedly) a SAFETY RIM ....i.e. they kept the tyre on the rim in case of loss of air -either slowly or even hopefully in case of a blowout.

    So have I been wrong all along?.......I thought it was the fact that the rims were rivetted and thus could have slow leaks in them that made tubes neccessary.........both on the Defender rims AND the early Range Rover (Ro-Style) rims.

  10. #20
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,538
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by byron View Post
    As I've ALWAYS understood it, these beads on the rim is what makes the rim what they used to call [in the mid sixties, when they became compulsory( suppsedly) a SAFETY RIM ....i.e. they kept the tyre on the rim in case of loss of air -either slowly or even hopefully in case of a blowout.

    So have I been wrong all along?.......I thought it was the fact that the rims were rivetted and thus could have slow leaks in them that made tubes neccessary.........both on the Defender rims AND the early Range Rover (Ro-Style) rims.
    "Safety" rims were, as you indicate, introduced in the sixties. Somewhere along the line they became compulsory for use with tubeless tyres, although there have been many cars with tubeless tyres and without this extra ledge. Offroad vehicles have often avoided the use of these, as they make tyre changing with hand tools more difficult, particularly with detachable side or split wheels.

    The leakage question is a separate one - rivetted wheels cannot be relied on to keep air in (athough often they do - I bought a S2 a couple of years ago that had tubeless tyres fitted - two of them were still inflated after it had been derelict for over ten years!), but also rims not designed to use tubeless tyres may not have had enough care taken on the finish of the bead seating to ensure a seal either.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!