Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Defender Swivel Housing

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cherrybrook, Sydney
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Defender Swivel Housing

    Very quick question. I have removed both the swivel housings of my defender '94 and just wanted to confirm which way around it goes back. The one has two arms for the stabiliser/steering bars and the other just one.

    Please confirm which is left and which is right i.e. passenger side vs. driver side on a RIGHT HAND drive vehicle

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Christchurch NZ
    Posts
    1,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Drivers side has 1, pass side has 2.
    1995 Defender 110 300TDI :D
    1954 86" Series 1 Automatic :eek:
    Ex '66 109" flat deck, '82 109" 3 door, '89 110 CSW V8, '74 Range Rover, '66 88" soft top, '78 88" soft top, '95 Disco ES V8, '88 Surf, '90 Surf, '84 V8 Surf, '91 Vitara.

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If I understand the question correctly, since the LH swivel housing connects to both the drag link and tie rod, and the RH swivel to the tie rod only, the answer is the two arms on the left.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cherrybrook, Sydney
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks guys, that's the way I had it but no harm double checking.
    Next issue:

    - In the Haynes manual it refers to a bearing load of 3.6kg to 4.5kg for the swivel pin housing.
    In another manual I have it says 1.16kg to 1.46kg resistance. which is correct?

    - the torque settings in the two manuals differ as well for the lower and upper swivel pin bolts, Haynes says 25nm lower and 38nm upper and the other manual says 78nm for both lower and upper. The lower bolts are smaller and I have tightened to 60nm but I 'm sure if I tighten anymore they will break

    - On the swivel assembly the illustration indicates a retaining plate and washer and then the seal. No issues with the plate and seal just wandering what that washer would look like. Is it a gasket, a plate or can one use a sealant or gasket maker?

    Thanks for the help, much appreciated

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GyroLandy View Post
    Thanks guys, that's the way I had it but no harm double checking.
    Next issue:

    - In the Haynes manual it refers to a bearing load of 3.6kg to 4.5kg for the swivel pin housing.
    In another manual I have it says 1.16kg to 1.46kg resistance. which is correct?

    - the torque settings in the two manuals differ as well for the lower and upper swivel pin bolts, Haynes says 25nm lower and 38nm upper and the other manual says 78nm for both lower and upper. The lower bolts are smaller and I have tightened to 60nm but I 'm sure if I tighten anymore they will break

    - On the swivel assembly the illustration indicates a retaining plate and washer and then the seal. No issues with the plate and seal just wandering what that washer would look like. Is it a gasket, a plate or can one use a sealant or gasket maker?

    Thanks for the help, much appreciated
    both are correct 4.5kg is the maximum pull to over come the inital resistance and get it moving (measured from the tie rod hole on the swivel housing) and 1.5kg is the maximum pull to keep it moving. Odds are you wont get it dead right and/or wont have the gear to measure it properly so as long as you dont need a stupid amount of force to move it and when it does move it offers some resistance and doesnt "notch" as it moves youve pretty much got it right. rave lists the 1.5kg nmber without an initial pull value.

    Rave says the swivel pin bolts get tightened to 78nm with locktite 270.

    the washer that I think that you are talking about is a metal plate identical in shape to the seal retaining plate but made of a softer metal IMHO over rated.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Cherrybrook, Sydney
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks! Do you know how I can distinguish between the two plates mentioned in point three. How would I know which is the gasket and which is the retaining plate?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    easy look at the plates, the one that is the thicker or harder of the 2 will be the plate wich means that the other one is the gasket.

    the plate will also have the following features

    paint (where its not rusty)
    rust (where its not painty)
    scratch marks on one face where tools have been used to remove the bolts
    burrs from where the spring washers have dug in

    the gasket will also have an imprint on it from the main housing on one side from where its been sitting against the main swivel housing.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Upwey, VIC
    Posts
    2,012
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    both are correct 4.5kg is the maximum pull to over come the inital resistance and get it moving (measured from the tie rod hole on the swivel housing) and 1.5kg is the maximum pull to keep it moving. Odds are you wont get it dead right and/or wont have the gear to measure it properly so as long as you dont need a stupid amount of force to move it and when it does move it offers some resistance and doesnt "notch" as it moves youve pretty much got it right. rave lists the 1.5kg nmber without an initial pull value.

    Rave says the swivel pin bolts get tightened to 78nm with locktite 270.

    the washer that I think that you are talking about is a metal plate identical in shape to the seal retaining plate but made of a softer metal IMHO over rated.
    Interesting you say 4.5kg, i have read on other sites that it is higher than this ??? here is one example Land Rover Forum I posted this somewhere else today too.

    Matt.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW , Pennant Hills
    Posts
    3,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    both are correct 4.5kg is the maximum pull to over come the inital resistance and get it moving (measured from the tie rod hole on the swivel housing) and 1.5kg is the maximum pull to keep it moving. Odds are you wont get it dead right and/or wont have the gear to measure it properly so as long as you dont need a stupid amount of force to move it and when it does move it offers some resistance and doesnt "notch" as it moves youve pretty much got it right. rave lists the 1.5kg nmber without an initial pull value.

    Rave says the swivel pin bolts get tightened to 78nm with locktite 270.

    the washer that I think that you are talking about is a metal plate identical in shape to the seal retaining plate but made of a softer metal IMHO over rated.
    when I set mine up for the Disco I didn't have the gear to set it up properly and did it by feel , when turning the Swivel housing the tension offfered some resistance didn't require a Great deal of force to rotate the swivel housing.

    so far it's been fine.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Upwey, VIC
    Posts
    2,012
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco_owner View Post
    when I set mine up for the Disco I didn't have the gear to set it up properly and did it by feel , when turning the Swivel housing the tension offfered some resistance didn't require a Great deal of force to rotate the swivel housing.

    so far it's been fine.
    I think i set mine to 5kg, think it needs a little bit more IMO, might bump it up to 6kg.

    M.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!