And another Q....
Just looking at prices for piston/ring assemblies and they vary dramatically for standard units (not getting into hepolite or anything serious). Are there any recommended brands or brand to avoid?
Picked up a second hand 3.9 I was planning on rebuilding until I saw this...
The previous owner said the block had been sitting for 6months, so I assume it's drunk some coolant via the inlet valve when he removed the inlet manifold. All the liners appear to be flush with the block, and you can still see the original hone marks (eng had done 200,000km before he yanked it.
I'm guessing this wont hone out and a rebore +20thou (or more?) would be needed, which is a bumber as I was hopping to just give a lite hone, new rings and slap it back together with new top end gear.
Has anyone had to deal with this before and did it clean up with a 20thou oversize rebore?
And another Q....
Just looking at prices for piston/ring assemblies and they vary dramatically for standard units (not getting into hepolite or anything serious). Are there any recommended brands or brand to avoid?
G`day Taz ,
i can`t tell from your pic what it really looks like .
If it were me i`d put a hone in it then decide , being up the top of the liner it`s not good as i guess you know because that`s where it needs to seal to work with any efficiency .
Factory 3.9 liners are thinner than Factory 3.5 , after market can be obtained in different thicknesses .
Generally because of the thinness of the Factory 3.9 liners it is not usual to rebore or fit oversize pistons though anything i guess is possible but as to how well it would work i don`t know .
Depending on cost and condition of the pistons you have it may be feasable if the liner won`t clean with a hone to fit one liner to the block , it doesn`t have to have a new piston to mate to a new liner , the liner is honed to suit the old piston .
It would need to be done by people with experence with these engines , well that would be my preference or at least a know capable engineer .
For the pistons/rings ect try an engine builder rather than a Rover parts place or Speacialist the engine builder will generally use non factory but will be able to price either and because they work with all makes you will find , i think that there prices will be more realistic .
Cheers , Peter .
That’s great advice - thanks Peter,
Yes I'm worried about the 3.9 liners moving if they are thinned down. And I'm also worried about having the liners replaced - since the one engine rebuilder in Perth that has been recommended on this forum by LoveMyV8County in Removing pistons with block still in the vehicle? , being Watmor engines in Woodbridge, appears to have closed down. Apparently they understood the nuisances of the whole hot block / cold liner thing.
I figure if a engine rebuilder fits a new liner cold - it's gunna move. And if they don’t know what they are doing with a hot insertion - it may cause the other good liners to move or even warp the block
Hmmm, maybe I'll just drop all the top end goodies I have into my current 3.5 !
Can stepped liners go into 3.9s as they do in 4.6s?? If the answer is yes - maybe this is an option.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
G`day Taz
If you can`t find good people to do the work don`t , would be my suggestion .
If yours is a B or C suffix 3.9 which will make it a 10 head bolt per bank block ? ( i don`t know about the A suffix 3.9 but they may be like a 3.5 )
The bottom of the liner if it was fitted so`s it sat where it should sits on it own surface and is held around its entire circumference which makes the liner depth easy and the height is flush so also easy .
Where the expertise and experence comes into it is the fit in the aluminium the liner which is a different metal but this also should be easy because the expansions etc will be charted .
For the reasons you give i would only be interested in cold fitting of a single liner and a press fit with the correct known tolerance .
As Garry suggests a single top hat liner could be used but they require more expertise/experence to fit than a straight sided liner because there are two depths to be known and in their case the top depth is as important as the bottom . The bottom one can be seen/felt but the top one will only be noticed if it`s not right , this is a reason for seeing any block that has been worked on with the heads off .
Top hat liner will cost more to fit and maybe buy , to my knowledge single factory liners can`t be got only sets , aftermarket of the correct thickness would be required or machined to it but i`d be asking what they intend .
Fitting one liner can upset the liner beside it but this is not guaranteed only possible .
Your use of a 3.9 in your RR is not the same as a 4.0/4.6 in a P38a although they can fail in a similar manner , the likely hood of survival is higher in your RR , this would also apply if it were a 4.0/4.6 . This only applies to an engine that hasn`t been overheated as generally this will be the cause of most failures in these engines that are not in a P38a .
Cheers
Thanks again Garry and Peter,
I've managed to track down one company in Perth that has at least fitted flanged liners to one rover v8 before. It's Performance Modifications in Osbourne park. Was quoted 2k for flange liners in all cylinders but that also included new cam bearings. Versus $250 for a +0.020" rebore and hone. But I'd have to add +0.020" pistons to that option. I've read on the UK V8Forum site that a 20thou rebore is OK with the 3.9, and as you say Pete - the P38's run higher thermostate temps so the risk of overheating a 3.9 maybe less. So there is probably only about $500 dif between top hat liner with old pistons and rebore with new. Perhaps I will try for a rebore and if the pitted/corroded liner doesnt clean up, then go top hats all round.
Cheers,
Taz.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks