Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: 3.5 high comp/low comp

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    it does but thankfully by the laws of averages and losses if you do the big number first followed by the little number it usually works out very closely.

    and yes LPG engines like higher compression usually better than 15:1 with a butt load of advance. If you set it up that hard you cant duel fuel.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    The difference is about 6.5cc only, a lot of surface area and a big bubble in the head which sits on an angle.

    Actually the measured difference will only come out at about half of that as thats about how much of the head cc is measured. 4cc from 437.5cc or about 1%

    Can you decipher much by pressure testing?



    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is a good reason to leave the 101 with a low compression.
    The 101 is most likely to be driven as a three speed in the real world and needs to lug in gears and under load.
    Even though the power of the lower compression engine is less, it will in practice be a softer motor and not has harsh and less likely to ping under load.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbo110 View Post
    The original compression ratio is stamped on the block, but piston or even gasket changes will change the ratio.
    Larger than standard bore size will also increase Compression ratio as well, Regards Frank.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    certainly you can get the number from a compression test....

    assuming your gauge is accurate go through and do your dry compression test then the wet.

    working in PSI your Max compression/14.7 gives you your X:1 figure although you may need to adjust it by a couple of points but it should give you near enough to work out a the 8. side of 8.13:1
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So my V8 4.2 had around 220 PSI. per cyl.
    Thats High comp?
    It ran beautifully on gas.

    (It was an import from a Rangie LSE) but reconned here with new pistons.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    sorry guys, I forgot some of the math on that...

    220:1 comes out at about 10.5:1

    The dry compression test is the one that comes out closest and the direct method without all the funky stroke VS bore math works for the series engine......

    I'll see if I can unprotect the spreadsheet thats got the math for it at work.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,148
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Allowing for valve overlap that'd match Deejay's fugures then.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!