Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 32's vs 31's on RRC with 2" lift

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Rosevale, Qld (south of the 'Switch)
    Posts
    329
    Total Downloaded
    0

    32's vs 31's on RRC with 2" lift

    All

    Is it worth the xtra $50/tyre to get 32 x 11.5 x 15 for my '81 rangie with 2" lift or go with 31's?

    TIA

    Stu
    Cheers,
    Stu

    1993 Range Rover Vogue SE 3.9lt - languishing
    2 x 1981 3.5lt V8 2dr Range Rover
    1958 Series 1 109" - "Bob" - COVID project

    Who wants another politician as Head of State? Not me:
    http://www.monarchist.org.au/

  2. #2
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Stu,

    I have 31 x 10.5's on my RRC with a 2" lift. The tyres only just make contact with the front guards and the plastic valance underneath when turning and hitting a bump at slow speed. Not enough to worry about over the last decade.

    On mine 32's would definitely require expanding front and rear lower parts of the front guards and the front lower part of the rear guards. I'm using Clark rubber flexi flares.

    cheers, DL

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,777
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Go the 32's, there is plenty of room in the guards of an RRC.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!