Anyone done this elegantly? I have GT2256V that needs controlling, it works by operating the vanes under vacuum. It seems that there's a mod out there that allows mechanical control of the Patrol 3.0 VVT turbo.
Details here Manual Boost Controller
Kit here Nissan Patrol and VAG TDi
Looks like a cheap solution but am I right thinking this could easily work on the 4BD1 to control a VVT turbo?
I have a plan that is currently untested and retains the vacuum can.
It uses two feeds, vacuum from the vacuum pump and pressure from boost. An adjustable bleed valve on each with them Tee'd together into the vacuum can.
So no boost, the vacuum wins and vanes pull shut. As boost climbs it reduces the vacuum and opens the vanes. Use the bleed valves to tune it for both response time and boost level. You can then complicate it as much as you like with dawes valves, one way valves, pedal position valves etc.
It should work, but I haven't got around to trying it (I also have a GT2256V lying around) and I don't think anyone else has either.
Seems alot of ****ing around and a complex system for what is quite a dumb setup, I don't think there is much advantage, no engine braking to be had, just need the vanes to change to obtain full boost
If you want to change boost with a pressure actuator you are very limited. The vacuum systems give you full control. Which is why 90% of VNT setups use them. The other 9.9% are direct electronic control.
Pressure based VNT control is extremely rare. The HS2.8 is the only engine I'm aware of that used it.
But you don't need the vanes to change/any control to bring it to full boost.... the vanes could be positioned for minimum nozzle area, maximum nozzle area or anywhere inbetwen and it will still reach full boost.
The variable vanes allow you to vary the rate at which it reaches full boost whilst allowing it to not over boost.
Ah good. Now we can get into some details on why to control it
So what your saying is that when fully open, the rate of change of boost is that low that it doesn't even over come inefficiencies?
And when it is fully shut, the rate of change of boost is that high that it hits a maximum of 18psi before flow restrictions limit any further boost?
So surely for optimal performance we would precisely control the vane position for maximum rate of change whilst not limiting maximum boost?
[EDIT rephrasing above line] So surely for optimal performance we would precisily control the vane for desired rate of change and desired amount of boost?
Last edited by SheldonA; 1st August 2011 at 10:29 AM. Reason: Rephrasing last line
Pinching pictures of his website and modifying - hope he doesn't have copyright....
Assuming unlimited traction, all things linear: engine, turbo characteristics, gas flow, blah blah blah, an ideal Boost Curve would be;
Plant your foot to the floor, instant max boost and therefore make use of the max amount of fuel you can stuff in the cylinder from idle.
Compared to Dawes system;
As you can see by comparing the two graphs, at lower revs you are missing out on possible boost with this system, which translate to less fuel burnt equating less power to the ground.
Typical Curve with ECU controlled solenoid;
Max boost hits earlier than Dawes system but overshoots then undershoots whilst trying to compensate - which isn't perfect.
As to whether you want to drive a rocket ship or if your happy with simple and adequate performance is up to you.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks