Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: VVT Control

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,545
    Total Downloaded
    0

    VVT Control

    Anyone done this elegantly? I have GT2256V that needs controlling, it works by operating the vanes under vacuum. It seems that there's a mod out there that allows mechanical control of the Patrol 3.0 VVT turbo.

    Details here Manual Boost Controller
    Kit here Nissan Patrol and VAG TDi

    Looks like a cheap solution but am I right thinking this could easily work on the 4BD1 to control a VVT turbo?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by inside View Post
    Anyone done this elegantly? I have GT2256V that needs controlling, it works by operating the vanes under vacuum. It seems that there's a mod out there that allows mechanical control of the Patrol 3.0 VVT turbo.

    Details here Manual Boost Controller
    Kit here Nissan Patrol and VAG TDi

    Looks like a cheap solution but am I right thinking this could easily work on the 4BD1 to control a VVT turbo?
    I control mine with a pressure operated wastegate actuator, works a treat

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a plan that is currently untested and retains the vacuum can.

    It uses two feeds, vacuum from the vacuum pump and pressure from boost. An adjustable bleed valve on each with them Tee'd together into the vacuum can.

    So no boost, the vacuum wins and vanes pull shut. As boost climbs it reduces the vacuum and opens the vanes. Use the bleed valves to tune it for both response time and boost level. You can then complicate it as much as you like with dawes valves, one way valves, pedal position valves etc.

    It should work, but I haven't got around to trying it (I also have a GT2256V lying around) and I don't think anyone else has either.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Seems alot of ****ing around and a complex system for what is quite a dumb setup, I don't think there is much advantage, no engine braking to be had, just need the vanes to change to obtain full boost

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Seems alot of ****ing around and a complex system for what is quite a dumb setup, I don't think there is much advantage, no engine braking to be had, just need the vanes to change to obtain full boost
    If you want to change boost with a pressure actuator you are very limited. The vacuum systems give you full control. Which is why 90% of VNT setups use them. The other 9.9% are direct electronic control.

    Pressure based VNT control is extremely rare. The HS2.8 is the only engine I'm aware of that used it.

  6. #6
    SheldonA Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Seems alot of ****ing around and a complex system for what is quite a dumb setup, I don't think there is much advantage, no engine braking to be had, just need the vanes to change to obtain full boost
    But you don't need the vanes to change/any control to bring it to full boost.... the vanes could be positioned for minimum nozzle area, maximum nozzle area or anywhere inbetwen and it will still reach full boost.

    The variable vanes allow you to vary the rate at which it reaches full boost whilst allowing it to not over boost.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by the_grubb View Post
    But you don't need the vanes to change/any control to bring it to full boost.... the vanes could be positioned for minimum nozzle area, maximum nozzle area or anywhere inbetwen and it will still reach full boost.

    The variable vanes allow you to vary the rate at which it reaches full boost whilst allowing it to not over boost.

    Ok so that explains why with the exact same fueling the vnt on mine with vanes locked shut will obtain 18psi, locked open makes 0 psi, but with a pressure can changing the vanes, makes 30 psi, ta for that

  8. #8
    SheldonA Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Ok so that explains why with the exact same fueling the vnt on mine with vanes locked shut will obtain 18psi, locked open makes 0 psi, but with a pressure can changing the vanes, makes 30 psi, ta for that
    Ah good. Now we can get into some details on why to control it

    So what your saying is that when fully open, the rate of change of boost is that low that it doesn't even over come inefficiencies?

    And when it is fully shut, the rate of change of boost is that high that it hits a maximum of 18psi before flow restrictions limit any further boost?

    So surely for optimal performance we would precisely control the vane position for maximum rate of change whilst not limiting maximum boost?

    [EDIT rephrasing above line] So surely for optimal performance we would precisily control the vane for desired rate of change and desired amount of boost?
    Last edited by SheldonA; 1st August 2011 at 10:29 AM. Reason: Rephrasing last line

  9. #9
    SheldonA Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by inside View Post
    Anyone done this elegantly? I have GT2256V that needs controlling, it works by operating the vanes under vacuum. It seems that there's a mod out there that allows mechanical control of the Patrol 3.0 VVT turbo.

    Details here Manual Boost Controller
    Kit here Nissan Patrol and VAG TDi

    Looks like a cheap solution but am I right thinking this could easily work on the 4BD1 to control a VVT turbo?
    Yes this is a cheap and reliable control to get some performance out of a Variable Vane Turbo on a 4BD1.

  10. #10
    SheldonA Guest
    Pinching pictures of his website and modifying - hope he doesn't have copyright....


    Assuming unlimited traction, all things linear: engine, turbo characteristics, gas flow, blah blah blah, an ideal Boost Curve would be;



    Plant your foot to the floor, instant max boost and therefore make use of the max amount of fuel you can stuff in the cylinder from idle.


    Compared to Dawes system;



    As you can see by comparing the two graphs, at lower revs you are missing out on possible boost with this system, which translate to less fuel burnt equating less power to the ground.

    Typical Curve with ECU controlled solenoid;



    Max boost hits earlier than Dawes system but overshoots then undershoots whilst trying to compensate - which isn't perfect.

    As to whether you want to drive a rocket ship or if your happy with simple and adequate performance is up to you.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!