Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 58

Thread: isuzu induction system

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by c.h.i.e.f View Post
    i was hoping that you commented on this isuzurover i found it quite strange that a rough surface would flow better too but then it rambled on about the design of a golf ball etc etc but obviously i should not take notice of this info then....why i was looking into intakes was i was wondering if there was any gains to be had from a new intake design such as the "banks big hoss" but i cannot see it being worth the effort for the gains?
    External aerodynamics is completely different to pipe flow. Btw - the dimpling only makes a difference to drag in a very small region of Re.


    http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/air...dragsphere.jpg
    Cd is drag coefficient, Re is Reynolds number.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I recently fitted a 3" stainless snorkel to mine, and some corrugated ducting to connect it to the filter inlet.
    I've noticed that I'm now getting the service indicator popping occasionally - which never used to happen before the snorkel was fitted.

    I keep meaning to disconnect the ducting and run it how it was originally again to prove if its actually the snorkel/ducting causing it (and not just coincidental with the filter getting a bit old), but haven't got around to it.

    Steve

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The equations you have posted prove it for me! and when thinking more into it is obvious that a rough surface creates more friction otherwise F1 cars and aircraft would have rough surfaces/paint and they dont
    steve it will be interesting to see your results as my compressor inlet is now 4" and as said before the inlet on the airbox is 3" so i dont know if i should step down to 3" straight away or make the whole system 4" i dont know...

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    How about getting some clear tube and making up a water manometer to take some pressure readings at different points in your inlet ducting.

    That way you'd have some real measurements and have something to compare any mods with.

    Steve

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steveG View Post
    How about getting some clear tube and making up a water manometer to take some pressure readings at different points in your inlet ducting.

    That way you'd have some real measurements and have something to compare any mods with.

    Steve
    Or just buy one of these: https://gastools.com.au/shop/index.p...od&productId=7

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steveG View Post
    How about getting some clear tube and making up a water manometer to take some pressure readings at different points in your inlet ducting.

    That way you'd have some real measurements and have something to compare any mods with.

    Steve
    Just be really careful about your pressure range first. You don't want to suck all the water out of the manometer and hydraulic your engine.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    Just be really careful about your pressure range first. You don't want to suck all the water out of the manometer and hydraulic your engine.
    Put a small orifice in the tube that goes to the intake. That way if you get it wrong you just move to test scenario #2 - water injection.

    Steve

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Was just wondering if anyone knows what would be best stainless tubing or alloy tubing ? Was thinking of going alloy because stainless holds heat for longer and alloy disipates it quicker from what I gather although im not sure so any metal thermal experts out there ? (I don't know the technical name for them )

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by c.h.i.e.f View Post
    Was just wondering if anyone knows what would be best stainless tubing or alloy tubing ? Was thinking of going alloy because stainless holds heat for longer and alloy disipates it quicker from what I gather although im not sure so any metal thermal experts out there ? (I don't know the technical name for them )
    I've seen some alloy intake tube, it's terrible thin and easy to dent, I'd rather use plastic down pipe

    Stainless is slow at conducting heat so actually insulates the air from the environment to a small degree.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you have an intercooler, then heat loss through the (other) piping will be insignificant.

    In a non-intercooled system and assuming the temperature of the air produced by the turbocharger is higher than ambient temp, then aluminium would have a minor advantage.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!