That's really easy to explain. I've got lots of it and no steel bar the right size.
It drills and taps much easier and still has sufficient strength for the job. Weight saving is a bonus. 62g.
The blue is locktight that got pushed out of the threads.
This shaft has bearing support at the gearbox and the transfer-box. The bearing in the middle was too much restraint and causing problems which it won't when it's gone.
In a perfect world it'd be a completely concentric shaft and the centre bearing would have no problem. But just like welding we have to account for distortion from the heat-treatment along with the splines cut in each end likely not being completely concentric.
If the shaft was long and flexible enough it would also be fine with a centre bearing, but this is quite short for it's diameter and I think stiffer than the housings which support the bearings.
There's no problem with someone wanting to tweak up the engine they've got. But getting all "butt-hurt" (american term) when it's pointed out why no-one else in the entire world has had success with supercharged diesels is just silly. It doesn't matter how many ricer burners you've owned. Diesels are very different.
Perhaps Mr VM thinks instead of doing all the maths and hard work behind turbo sizing we should all just be running terrible turbos and strap on a supercharger as well!
Rings embedded in the head, isn't that factory?


 
				
				
				
				
					
  Reply With Quote
 isuzurover it was only time that determined when you would pipe up.




Bookmarks