
Originally Posted by
Dougal
Some food for thought.
The 4BD1T and 1HD-FTE have basically the same peak efficiency. ~210g/kwh at rated torque.
The displacement is within 10%.
So given the same fuel and air, the 1HD-FTE is going to deliver the same results. The increase in displacement and 4 valve per cylinder means it can deliver a fraction more airflow for the same boost.
So the only way a 1HD-FTE is going to deliver any more power is by spinning faster, which is where the efficiency drops and fuel burn starts to really suck.
At lower loads the 1HD-FTE with more internal friction (two extra cylinders) suffers an efficiency penalty and burns more fuel. My fathers 1HD-FTE cruiser has just done 200,000km from new and has never broken 10km/litre. Even when driven like the proverbial grandfather (the steering is too vague to drive it fast anyway).
So.
You want more go. You need more boost and more fuel to go with it. It's that simple. Changing engines ain't going to help much.
You'll also be looking at something better than the LT95.
Thanks Dougal,
Yes I figured that a bit of an overhaul and slight power up should work wonders. The LT95 is I feel quite capable, I have TR bearings in the transfer, and good gear ratios as far as I can tell with this load, even on hill starts. It'll hold top gear too up hills towwing even down to 75km/h. Only had to use low range to park/ maneuvre.
The engine as I mentioned has some big miles, and injectors and pump untouched. TB25 turbo and a BIG FMIC. I guess that wouldmn't help the cooling for the rad, either.
There will have to be a bit of an engine and fuel system upgrade/ overhaul sometime this year or next I reckon
JC
The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈
Bookmarks