Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Biggest Intercooler for Isuzu 4BD1T

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Biggest Intercooler for Isuzu 4BD1T

    When I fitted my 4BD1Turbo to the County, I wanted to fit an intercooler, but I wasn't sure what size was appropriate. So I asked a couple of local turbo specialists the question....."how do I know what size intercooler to fit to a particular engine ?"........the response from both of them was, fit the biggest one you can. I ended up fitting one with a core size of 22" x 7" x 2.5" (385 cu/in overall size) because I got it for a really good price and I thought it was fairly big anyway. Compared to a Td5 Defender IC at 24 x 8.5 x 1 (204 cu/in), it was nearly twice the cubic size.
    Anyway, looking at it now, I see I could fit an IC with a core size of 29 x 11 x 3 (792 cu/in).
    What I'm wondering is, how big can you go with an IC before you affect issues like lag, because of the increased volume that the turbo has to pressurise ? Is anything else adversly affected by too big an intercooler ? I mean, is there some sort of formular to work it out ? There must be a limit.

    I'm not looking to push my engine beyond it's reliability limits, but I have tweaked my fuel a bit, and running 15psi boost. EGT's are a max of approx' 690c.
    My gut feeling is that a bigger IC to the size above would obviously benefit EGT's, and would not have much affect on lag as the Isuzu, at 3.9 litres, pushes a lot of air through the system.

    Any thoughts ??

    Cheers, Murray
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,516
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't think that there IS a theoretical limit. The lag problem seems to be a bit of a furphy to me - the speed with which an increase in pressure (as the turbo speeds up) through the entire intake system is going to be the speed of sound - so the only effect will be the need to fill a larger volume, which I suspect will be marginal.

    On the positive side, the cooler the better no matter how you look at it, and the larger the intercooler the smaller the flow resistance will be. In both cases it will be a case of diminishing returns, but I think that the practical limit (what will fit) will be reached long before the improvement of going bigger is negligible. So what they told you is correct. I doubt that there is any sort of formula, and if there is it will be a rule of thumb, and probably directed at the smallest one worth fitting rather than the largest.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Darwin
    Posts
    462
    Total Downloaded
    0
    rijidij

    Mate, I'd be interested in what people have to say on this as I've been looking for an answer to this exact question over the last couple of days.

    After a bit of searching I came to the conclusion that you wouldn't put an intercooler in that flows excessivly more than the flow capability of your turbo can supply. I know that the Garrett website has the flow spec's for their turbos, then it's just a matter of getting a intercooler that can match it. I probably wouldn't get one that is too big as I don't particularly want to spend any more money than I need to.
    I do think John is in the ball park though, I mean once there is 15psi in the system there is 15 psi in the system. If there was a noticable amount of lag when you put your foot down then there would be a pressure dop at you boost gauge. I don't notice this happening.

    One thing I have noticed while trawling through the web for intercoolers is that, even though I'm a big preecher of e-bay buyer beware, I'm struggling to spot the differance between the $900 intercoolers that are advertised in the shops and the 150$ ones of e-bay. Anyone with personal expearience out there please add your thoughts.

    Also, where can you buy cores from, I wouldn't mind making my own header tanks an doing one up myself. They use to sell on e-bay cheap, I figured if they were crap cores then I wouldn't have lost much in the sceam of things

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    , but I think that the practical limit (what will fit) will be reached long before the improvement of going bigger is negligible.

    John
    Thanks JD,
    This is what I was thinking too. In the case of a County where you want a front mounted air/air IC, you are limited to what will fit between the guards length wise, and between the radiator and the plastic grill depth wise. In my case I have the A/C grill with the condenser removed, so I have a bit of space to fill if I so desire. I don't think filling this available space with intercooler would be 'too much' for the 3.9.

    But hypothetically (and grosely exagerating), if you fitted an IC from say, a 16 litre V8 diesel truck engine to a 3.9 litre engine, this would be way too big and would have to have a negative effect on performance. I'm guessing this IC would be something like 9000 cu/in (they are huge)
    So, somewhere between say, 800 to 9000 cu/in is the biggest size IC that the 3.9 engine would benefit from.

    Just curious, that's all.

    Cheers, Murray
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Larns View Post

    After a bit of searching I came to the conclusion that you wouldn't put an intercooler in that flows excessivly more than the flow capability of your turbo can supply. I know that the Garrett website has the flow spec's for their turbos, then it's just a matter of getting a intercooler that can match it.
    Yeah, that's what I mean by some kind of 'formular' to work out the appropriate size for a particular engine/turbo.

    One thing I have noticed while trawling through the web for intercoolers is that, even though I'm a big preecher of e-bay buyer beware, I'm struggling to spot the differance between the $900 intercoolers that are advertised in the shops and the 150$ ones of e-bay. Anyone with personal expearience out there please add your thoughts.
    I bought my brand new intercooler off EbayAU. $89. I was a bit sceptical until it arrived in the post. As it turned out, it was made in the States, seemed very well made, was the newer bar and plate type, and I was very happy with my purchase for that price (I think I was lucky). This is the exact type that I got >>>>>>>>>>>

    cxracing.com: Front Mount Intercooler 28"x7"x2.5", 2.5" Core: 22"x7"x2.5", 2.5" Inlet & Outlet, , BMW Audi A4 Golf


    Cheers, Murray

    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  6. #6
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had problems with an oversized intercooler on a De Tomasu and then the same problem on a Bi Turbo years ago, but that was due to the fact of it acting like a big pressure reservoir against a closed butterfly at low rev's . But none of that relates to diesels so i would say bigger the better ( but not a truck one)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    some great articles on autospeed about sizing intercoolers among many more:
    Browser Warning

    Browser Warning

    Browser Warning

  8. #8
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Corky Bell has abook on turbocharging engines, it is about petrol engines but some things still apply. lets see what I remember without having to pull the book out.

    Volume in not necessarily the best thing by which to compare i/c. Area provides better returns than volume. The thick i/c does not provide the same cooling to the back part as it does to the front as the air passing through has already picked up heat from the front. In terms of area more air passages are better that long air passages.

    I do not understand the reference to the speed of sound. I think the time it takes to get a volume up to pressure will depend on the volume rate that the turbo can push air into the i/c and hoses. I don't recall the detail, it could be something inperceptible for all I remember.

    From all that I would say go for more area not volume, go for wide and short not long and skinny.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rijidij View Post
    Cheers, Murray

    Hi Murray, FWIW my I/C is the same as yours, except about 1/3rd taller. Mine was branded 'Hybrid', and was supplied through an aftermarket accessory supplier.

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  10. #10
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=slug_burner;939377]

    I do not understand the reference to the speed of sound. I think the time it takes to get a volume up to pressure will depend on the volume rate that the turbo can push air into the i/c and hoses. I don't recall the detail, it could be something inperceptible for all I remember.

    QUOTE]

    1 air behaves or will flow very differently as it approaches the speed of sound

    2 the speed of sound increases as air mass decreases and visa versa

    ie 3.9 ltr at 3000rpm = 58oo ltrs per minute NA

    50mm inlet pipe at 5800 ltrs per minute = 61.5 cm2 / 5800ltr or 5800000cm2 = 94121 cm lineal per minute 15.58 meters per second

    so basically its a non issue as speed of sound is at 20 deg is 340ms and at 50 deg 360ms

    but air will behave very interesting at higher speeds. if you are interested google square area rule, its not applicable here but very interesting none the less

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!