Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Why are Stage 1 Isuzu's so noisy ??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Why are Stage 1 Isuzu's so noisy ??

    We've all heard 'non-Isuzu Landy drivers' criticise the 4BD1 for being very noisy and "rattling our cars to bits", but was this reputation partly earned by the Stage 1's.

    I consider my 4Bd1T ('88 model truck motor) to have quite an acceptable noise level....no louder than my Td5 Defender with the front vents open. And the rear side windows in the Defender are more rattly than the County's.

    I have several friends with factory N/A Isuzu Countys, and one which is fitted with a 4BD1 from a Stage 1. There is a very obvious difference in the noise level of the engine. Series 3 Stage 1's seem to be noisier than Countys.

    What changed in these engines over the years ? Why are the earlier engines noisier ? There must be some mechanical explanation.

    I'm just curious, as I've recently had discussions with a fellow AULROian who's considering an Isuzu conversion, and obviously, if you're gunna buy a second hand engine it would be good to know what you're looking at.

    Cheers, Murray
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I remember my '85 120" to be considerably more noisy than my '88 110.

    The '88 doesn't seem more noisy than my 300tdi, maybe that's wishful thinking.

    I guess I could dig out the sound meter thingy and compare.


    Nah.

    Simon

  3. #3
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am pretty sure all of the stage 1 Isuzu motors were not fitted with the valve rocker cover "hush kits" The black external tin cover on top of the motor. Makes a heap of difference to the level of valve noise that can be heard.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Darwin
    Posts
    462
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's got something to do with the head/cam set up I'm sure of it. I rebuilt one a few years back out of a stage 1 and used all new/reconditioned parts except for the short block,head,and cam and it was noticably knockier than my engine that had the exact same parts sourced, except for the previously listed items.
    I even tried my rocker cover and tappet assembly on his to see if we could track down the noise. We never did quiet figure out why exactly, we could only put it down to the head/cam as they were different no's.

    Hope this helps
    Last edited by Larns; 21st March 2009 at 10:45 PM. Reason: spelling.....again

  5. #5
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    interesting. I had a drive of YT110's 86? and it was considerably as in a very big way quieter and much smother though the rev range than my 85. So much so that when I got home I checked my engine mounts. I have even gone as far as pricing replacements thinking mine may have hardened over the last 24 years.

    In fact YT110 was no more noisy than my TDI300 disco and a lot nicer to drive.

    What are the different cam part numbers, are there different followers and push rods, rocker arms etc.

    The difference is that great that I would consider changing cams for that reason alone. depending on price

    Was there a different power rating with the different cams ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    On the beach at Hervey Bay
    Posts
    1,562
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Very interesting. My motor is out of an 85 county and is very loud and harsh.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IRC:
    Stage 1s are rated at 85Bhp - same as mil spec engines.

    Countys are rated at 99 Bhp.

    So there must be some differences.

    I have been told by someone who should know, that if you retard the timing slightly they will quieten down.

  8. #8
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This was mentioned to me years ago by Fred Smith, and he told me the Stage 1 had slightly higher compression.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes I'm wondering if it's more injector/combustion noise too.
    Some engines of any family are noisier than others, I've had this mentioned to me before about 300Tdi's too, and I think it usually comes down to the state of the injectors/pump and timing.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As far as I know, yes compression is higher and timing is different in stage 1's which will make them louder for sure. This is NOT an engine I would like to use for a conversion. My ex 1988110 engine at 100km'h is almost as quiet as when I had the V8, as I can hear the M/T's over the noiise of the 4bd1

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!