Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: Holden v6 into Defender 110 ute

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    The Rover V8 started off in a Buick, did either Rover or GM/Buick change the bolt pattern for the bellhousing between the Rover and current GM V6s?
    The original Buick V6 and the Holden V6 version have different bell housings to the Rover V8, much smaller. I had a bloke here once with a buick 2.8 V6 in a z-drive boat who installed a P76 instead. Much fun!.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bazzle218 View Post
    I love my 30tdi defender ute but also the vt sedan. If i fitted the commodore motor i recon i would have the best of both worlds. Advice , abuse, opinions welcome. Letem rip
    You could also have "the best of both worlds" if you put the 300tdi engine in the VT sedan.

    However, I think that would still be just as much a mismatch.

    You did ask for opinions.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The following publications would get you au fait with what can be done with the Buick V6.

    "Buick Power Source" Buick Motor Division, General Motors Corp. - Heavy Duty Parts List; Technical Data; Modification Details; Blueprinting.

    "Buick Power Source" Buick Motor Division, General Motors Corp. - Electronic Engine Management System.

    "The Buick Stage II V-6 Racing Engine." - Dave Emanuel, Performance Publications.

    "Jim Ruggles' Buick V6 Performance Guide." - Jim Ruggles, Petersen Publishing Company.

    Buick show torque and horsepower graphs up to 800 hp @ 8400 rpm for a turbocharged methanol burning Indianapolis engine, and a naturally aspirated gasoline burning drag race engine of 460 hp @ 7500 rpm.
    URSUSMAJOR

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I was almost going to put a Holden V6 into my BJ40, its a pretty common Hilux conversion.

    Re petrol motors, I put a Ford 302w ex F100 & c6 Auto / lockup converter with Marks adaptor & G60 Xfer case into my 90 , F&R Maxidrive difflocks and thought it was the bees knees. Had a 4.4 P76 in front of a RR Box in a LWB.

    Since then I had 3 Toyota Diesels 1HDT 4.2 liter turbo, 1HZ 4.2 liter NA, & Toyota B 3 L 4cyl and now my first Landy Diesel, the Td5 (chipped) .
    Honestly the Td5 in the 110 has better useful power & WAAAAY better fuel economy than any of them, The only thing the 302 was better at was smoking up the rear tyres. Personally I doubt I'd go back to a petrol motor, or a V8 .

    Thats what put me off buying a FJ Cruiser, they only come in Petrol V6 & The big cruisers only come in V8 now, which is ultimately got me back into a LandRover

    A holden V6 110 Might be OK for a Day Tripper or Toolangi Truck but I would not want to go long distance touring with it.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Why not , these old fuddy duddies simply dont know whats out there , the 4.2 stroker V6 puts out better than 230KW (yes KW not HP!)and has 400Nm torque , (miles better than the crappy 4.6 RV8 )The supercharged version of the ecotec ,about the same .Its only a matter of careful cam selection to bring the torque curve down into a more useable range (only thing is, is there any suitable adapters to do the conversion with ?)
    I'm 28 and putting a supercharged ls1 into a p38, I've done plenty of engine conversion, a commodore v6 will not be worth the expense in a 2250+kg car, simple, I've put them in luxs, 2and 4 wheel drive, which they suit, but basically all the expenses are the same, except initial outlay for the engine, which is a small part

    Building a stroked commodore v6? You money would be better spent at the pokies

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My personal opinion is that they are a noisy, harsh and very unrefined engine that works well in a lightweight 2wd car, but kind of useless in a heavy 4x4.

    Diesel is the way, especially a turbocharged one, infact Tdi is just fine

    JC

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well Justinc if the alloytec V6 is a harsh,noisy,unrefined engine ,then what does that make every Rover V8 ever made ? Ill tell you, a gutless,juice chewing pile of unreliable junk. If you were to look up a power/torque curves for say a ALLOYTEC 3.6 190 V6 and any Variant of the rover 3.9 you will find that at no point does the Rover engine come anywhere near the the holden engine in both TORQUE or Horsepower.
    I Suppose its the silent shaft and Roller cam ,the 2 less cylinders and the smaller .3 liter capacity really didnt count for much !!!Lets not even go near the latest SIDI incarnation and compare that with a Rover V8.
    Why is it that all these wives tales say its allright to have a Rover V8 that makes bugger all useful torque/Horsepower but you cant replace it with something (V6 alloytec) that delivers more torque , is twice as economical,across its entire Rev range .
    Rovercares probably right ,dollar for dollar perhaps a ALCOA (LS1)special would be better
    Rovercare ,you ever heard of C.O.M.E. racing , look them up in Melbourne and have a yarn about his 4.2 strokers ,say hello to Sam for me !!!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Well Justinc if the alloytec V6 is a harsh,noisy,unrefined engine ,then what does that make every Rover V8 ever made ? Ill tell you, a gutless,juice chewing pile of unreliable junk.........!

    ... That's a bit, um... harsh.


    Sounds like agreement with my uninformed opinion that Land Rover got it wrong (with the petrol v8) and stubbornly refused to power the RRC et al with a more 'Fit for Purpose' powerplant... (as well as other bits and pieces)

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Rovercare ,you ever heard of C.O.M.E. racing , look them up in Melbourne and have a yarn about his 4.2 strokers ,say hello to Sam for me !!!
    Chevy offroad, no, the cost of buying a rolling kit to stroke a v6 plus machining makes it even more ridiculous, then you have a bitsa and again, what do I care about such miniscul cubes

    They are crude, very crude efi, as crude as a 3.9 with 14cux

    Again, have you put any in anything a ton heavier than a commodore?

    It's not a viable or smart conversion by any stretch of the imagination

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i used to average 13.6-13.9l/100 in my VZ one tonner work car (loaded), pretty crap economy, my inlaws average 13.9-15l/100 in the P38. Yeah commodore v6 in a 2.5 tonne car, i'd be saying to economy would be much worse

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!