Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: R 380 to a LT95 Tfr

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You would probably be better off keeping things standard and fitting a pneumatic, vacuum or electric servo to your overdrive linkage, rigged up to activate only when the clutch pedal is operated.
    Bill.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by woko View Post
    New pto winch(best set up)

    Does the PTO out of the transfer box look like this?
    No - like this (sideways)

    Garry
    Last edited by 101RRS; 3rd January 2017 at 06:07 PM.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #13
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Garry,

    Purists will hate this...............but have you considered an auto trans in front of a LT95 TC? Not the BW bodge jobs, but a Ritters C 4/9 conversion from the early 1980's ?

    It would bolt straight up to a 3.5 or 4.6 using stock trans mounts and stock driveshaft length. I have had one behind a 350 in a 74 RRC for some time now and really enjoy it.

    The advantages are numerous.......... you get the multiplier effect from the torque convertor so it will take off much faster, outright initial cost is minimal because everyone wants a 5 or 6 speed, the workmanship in the bellhousing, adaptor section and the machining of the LT 95 is top notch. The cost of a full reco and bulletproofing of a C9 is less than a grand. A good C 4/9 would easily handle a 4.6 with the weight of a 101.

    And it does crawl downhill in low range.

    The only downside is that it is better leaving the auto in 1st or 2nd when in low range because it tends to hunt between the gears too much in drive with mega driveline clunks. Only when in low range though.

    DL

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks - have thought of it but would prefer to stay manual. Also the LT95 arrangement in the 101 is a couple of inches shorter than a normal LT95 so the engine will end up further forward than it is now but that is likely to be a similar issue for a R380 though I would be using a short bell housing so maybe not.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Garry

    Have you considered using an electric or pneumatic solenoid on your overdrive?

    It is the way that 2 speed truck diffs operate with the actuator switch attached to the shaft of the main gear stick just below the knob.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    Hi Garry,

    Purists will hate this...............but have you considered an auto trans in front of a LT95 TC? Not the BW bodge jobs, but a Ritters C 4/9 conversion from the early 1980's ?

    It would bolt straight up to a 3.5 or 4.6 using stock trans mounts and stock driveshaft length. I have had one behind a 350 in a 74 RRC for some time now and really enjoy it.

    The advantages are numerous.......... you get the multiplier effect from the torque convertor so it will take off much faster, outright initial cost is minimal because everyone wants a 5 or 6 speed, the workmanship in the bellhousing, adaptor section and the machining of the LT 95 is top notch. The cost of a full reco and bulletproofing of a C9 is less than a grand. A good C 4/9 would easily handle a 4.6 with the weight of a 101.

    And it does crawl downhill in low range.

    The only downside is that it is better leaving the auto in 1st or 2nd when in low range because it tends to hunt between the gears too much in drive with mega driveline clunks. Only when in low range though.

    DL
    I've actually got one of those BW bodge jobs in the shed. Bit long for a 101 even if they weren't crap.
    Even if Gary wanted to go over to auto trans, the 101 winch in my experience is not a particularly good match for a torque convertor.
    Once when I was recovering a T400 auto equipped 101 that was bogged down to the diffs, the winch rope on my own vehicle wasn't long enough to reach so the 101 owner payed out some of the 101s winch rope and joined it to mine.
    The 101s winch has very little gear reduction and depends on a positive connection to the engine to hold the vehicle on a slope when not winching.
    The big Chevvy 454s torque convertor at a fast idle (2000rpm) couldn't provide enough resistance, and the pull from my winch only succeeded in unwinding his rope, even though his winch was also attempting to pull. We worked around this problem, but I'd imagine there would be some winching scenarios where this would be a PITA.
    Bill.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Garry

    Have you considered using an electric or pneumatic solenoid on your overdrive?

    It is the way that 2 speed truck diffs operate with the actuator switch attached to the shaft of the main gear stick just below the knob.

    Diana
    Only passing but is a good option - would be Ok changing into O/d but when changing out (essentially changing down a gear) may be problematic. The O/d is fully synchronised but like many gearboxes it requires a slow movement to not get ahead of the synchros - I normally double shuffle it when changing down which works well (mostly). If I changed down without double shuffling the movement is so slow that I immediately need to also change back from 4th to 3rd on the gearbox (unless on the flat) as you loose too many revs.

    The type of change suggested would be OK engaging but most likely too quick when disengaging but obviously I have not tested it.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've forgotten all the different permutations, but is there such a thing as a short Lt77/R380 to V8 bellhousing?
    Your short 101 housing could be bolted on to an R380 with a sandwich plate.
    Or how about fitting a complete short bell R380/Lt230 and fitting a right angle drive onto the output shaft of a vertically clocked Maxidrive winch PTO?
    Bill.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by wagoo View Post
    I've forgotten all the different permutations, but is there such a thing as a short Lt77/R380 to V8 bellhousing?
    Your short 101 housing could be bolted on to an R380 with a sandwich plate.
    Or how about fitting a complete R380/Lt230 and fitting a right angle drive onto a vertically clocked Maxidrive winch PTO?
    Bill.
    AFAIK Ashcrofts only make the short Bellhousing R380 kit for the 200Td1. The one to ask would be Dave Ashcroft "Ashtrans" on this forum.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Only passing but is a good option - would be Ok changing into O/d but when changing out (essentially changing down a gear) may be problematic. The O/d is fully synchronised but like many gearboxes it requires a slow movement to not get ahead of the synchros - I normally double shuffle it when changing down which works well (mostly). If I changed down without double shuffling the movement is so slow that I immediately need to also change back from 4th to 3rd on the gearbox (unless on the flat) as you loose too many revs.

    The type of change suggested would be OK engaging but most likely too quick when disengaging but obviously I have not tested it.

    Cheers

    Garry
    I think you could play around with different servo pressures to get a reasonable shift, and with a ratio difference of only 27% I would think the synchros should be adequate.
    My Warner T98 synchros have to cope with almost 100% ratio difference between gears, and they cope with fast shifts.



    Most of the time.
    Bill.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!