
Originally Posted by
vnx205
It might be interesting as long as they don't become so obsessed with the notion of parity that the cars are so similar that the only difference is the colour.
I thought that the Bathurst 12 hour was a good reminder that you can get some very close, interesting racing when there are actually some differences between the cars.
It certainly is more entertaining when one car is slightly faster down the straight, another is better under brakes, another accelerates out of the corners a bit better, one is better around the slower corners and yet another one handles the faster corners better.
The organisers are apparently proud of how close they have managed to make the performance of the cars. Surely they are clever enough that they can incorporate some differences and accept that on some tracks one car might have a slight edge as long as others have a slight advantage on a different track.
Surely the ideal form of parity is one where over the whole year every car has a chance of winning rather than insisting on equal performance on every part of every track.
The Minis v the Mustangs, especially at Oran Park was more interesting than the recent Holden v Ford era of racing.
Anyway, back to the topic of the original post. Yes, that Volvo could provide some interesting racing. if it lives up to expectations.
The parity is that the rolling chassis is identical, only the shape and engine is different, one company makes the rolling chassis, engine and body is added by the Racing Team.
Also, horse power can't be over a certain amount, down force must be identical and weight must within a certain range.
Baz.
Cheers Baz.
2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
2007 BMW R1200GS
1979 BMW R80/7
1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow
Bookmarks