Originally Posted by
Pickles2
And of course then there's handling,...I've never heard anyone say that a VE Valiant handled well, quite simply, because it didn't. It was the worst of the three.
In your Opinion :) Remember you are comparing Holden sports models with Valiant family cars.
Look, if you're a Chrysler man, We ain't never gonna agree, but I'm probably older than you, I was driving these cars at the time.
Maybe but I also drove the AP6, the VC, VE and VF at the time as well as some Holdens and Falcons. The Valiant did not feel as nimble but felt more solid and safer - a better quality vehicle.
Most of the guys had Holdens, because they were Holdens I suppose, and there was HEAPS of stuff to make 'em go quicker......because there was a demand it.
Holdens were cheap and nasty where the Valiants were more expensive. The Holdens needed heaps of stuff to make them go quicker and to get to respectable performance where the Valiants already had it built in