Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Anyone made a 6x6 pto for LT95?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Bill

    I sometimes wonder if it would be a useful mod to put a viscous coupling in the drive to the "C" axle? That way it would give some slip for highway use, but still sufficient traction for most off-road applications.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am ignorant on the matter of LR 6wd, I was wondering why you couldn't do it like the bogey drive on trucks with drive for the rear axle coming out the back of the front diff, which also has a transfer type diff lock mounted above the front axle pinion, this diff operates like the LR centre (full time 4wd) diff and can also be locked, Regards Frank.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    I am ignorant on the matter of LR 6wd, I was wondering why you couldn't do it like the bogey drive on trucks with drive for the rear axle coming out the back of the front diff, which also has a transfer type diff lock mounted above the front axle pinion, this diff operates like the LR centre (full time 4wd) diff and can also be locked, Regards Frank.
    As Bill has posted many times, either of these options severely limit articulation. Not an issue on trucks...

  4. #24
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Bill

    I sometimes wonder if it would be a useful mod to put a viscous coupling in the drive to the "C" axle? That way it would give some slip for highway use, but still sufficient traction for most off-road applications.

    Diana
    In the Perentie setup, the 'C' axle is only engaged when the difflock is activated. In other words, on the highway it is a 6x4, but with the front two axles engaged with a diff between them. While this is a little unconventional, it is a bit hard to see where you would need all axles driving but be concerned about the centre diff being locked.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    THANKS F0R FIXING THAT UP F0R ME DIANA: N0 I'M N0T HAVING A 1END, THIS IS HARD T0 D0:MY KEYB0ARD IS FA11iNG T0 PIECES AND I'VE 10ST MY 0Hs, E11s, NINES AND FU11 ST0PS:
    I'M ATTEMPTING T0 DESIGN THIS PT0 USING STANDARD THR0WAWAY C0MP0NENTS, BUT I'M N0T G0ING T0 BUi1D AN0THER 6X6 MYSE1F, JUST DESIGNING IT F0R S0ME0NE E1SE WH0 WANTS T0 BUi1D 0NE AND T0 KEEP THE 01D GREY MATTER ACTIVE:
    I'M THINKING THE Mi1iTARY HAVE PR0BAB1Y G0T STACKS 0F THESE 6X6 DRIVES IN THEIR SPARE PARTS ST0CK AND WHEN THEY DISP0SE 0F THE TRUCKS AND PARTS THE DRIVES Wi11 SE11 F0R PEANUTS:
    WAG00:

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ben, I've never looked under a 6x6 Land Rover, but if that pic on previous page indicates that there are 2 tailshafts, then the one to the rear diff would seem to be ridiculously long and I would imagine it would run above the front diff housing. That to me seems to be a limiting factor for articulation of both axles. Whereas the bogey truck setup found on most 4x2 trucks seems to work well on 6x6 military trucks, do you have a pic of the Land Rover 6x6 setup, would be interested to see, I did have a pic of a Ford F250 setup with bogey just like the trucks have and it was brilliant off road, will see if I can dig it up, BTW this is the first time I have seen Bill's posts on this subject, Regards Frank.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Bill,
    Im no machinist but Im happy to make chips on the lathe for you if you send me bits and a drawing of what needs doing. Dont have a big lathe (12x36 in the old money) but its well big enough to throw landy gearbox components. I have tungsten carbide tooling and flood coolant.

    S
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  8. #28
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    Ben, I've never looked under a 6x6 Land Rover, but if that pic on previous page indicates that there are 2 tailshafts, then the one to the rear diff would seem to be ridiculously long and I would imagine it would run above the front diff housing. That to me seems to be a limiting factor for articulation of both axles. Whereas the bogey truck setup found on most 4x2 trucks seems to work well on 6x6 military trucks, do you have a pic of the Land Rover 6x6 setup, would be interested to see, I did have a pic of a Ford F250 setup with bogey just like the trucks have and it was brilliant off road, will see if I can dig it up, BTW this is the first time I have seen Bill's posts on this subject, Regards Frank.
    The tailshaft to the 'C' axle has a centre bearing on top of the 'B' axle with an extra two U-joints and sliding joint. The diff on this axle is on the left rather than the right, and I doubt the drive is a limiting factor on articulation. This will be limited by the leaf springs, and will be somewhat larger than Series Landrovers which use the same spring, because of the rocking beam linking the springs on the two axles. However, the effective articulation will be a little less than it otherwise would be, because of the wider track.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Perentie 6x6 articulation is very poor to say the least.But the long primary wheelbase,rear overhang, staggered offset rear diffs and ground clearance sapping underslung leaf springs suggest that cross country mobility wasn't very high on the designers priority list, rather than heavy, bulky load carrying ability
    .The two piece propshaft with the centre bearing mounted high on the chassis is not condusive to good articulation either, and required that the front of the rearmost propshaft be fitted with a double cardan joint, that from experience with civilian Landy 6x6s, have a short service life.I would have thought that mounting the centre bearing on the axle tube of the leading rear axle, and splitting the angles between both propshafts, ala Studebaker and GMCs would have eliminated the need for the double cardan joint, in addition to permitting greater interaxle articulation, should a proper cross country suspension be fitted.
    Even this arrangement doesn't give what I would call great articulation.
    For example, even if the rearmost propshaft was fitted with 40 degree universal joints and it could be setup so that the U joints were straight with the vehicle on level ground, the most axle travel that could be had would be 13'' down and 13'' up. Assuming a static bumpstop clearance of say 6'' this translates to only 19'' of bogie articulation.Edit, thought about it some more and it should be able to get 26'', but the final 7'' of droop would be just the weight of the axle assembly providing traction, not an equal share of the rear vehicle mass..
    The calculations are based on leaf springs keeping the axles parrallel throughout range of travel, an axle spacing of 39'' minus 13'' for the pinion length of a Salisbury diff, giving a propshaft length of 26''flange to flange, leaving a distance of around 22'' between universal joints.
    The best drive arrangement for articulation, that still employed conventional axles i've seen was on the old Aus army AACO Internationals, with a vertical gear driven pinion mounted drop box on each rear axle. The propshaft u joints were almost straight, and the shaft was nearly as long as the axle spacing.

    Bill.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post
    Bill,
    Im no machinist but Im happy to make chips on the lathe for you if you send me bits and a drawing of what needs doing. Dont have a big lathe (12x36 in the old money) but its well big enough to throw landy gearbox components. I have tungsten carbide tooling and flood coolant.

    S
    Thanks for the offer S. I do have access to a lathe about 60km from here, but for the next month or so I will be very busy with bushfire prevention work on my property before summer, so won't be able to concentrate too much on the PTO until after then.
    Regards, Bill.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!