Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Puma--what can it really tow

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scallops View Post
    Yeah - I reckon an engine runs in for max "breathability" over more than 5 times that mileage though. I reckon fredrick will discover that.
    Td5's were much better once they had done around 20K

    My son has pulled a trailer with a mazda race car on it a good few times with his Puma with no problems..........

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Yarrawonga Vic
    Posts
    40
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dm_td5 View Post
    The best gear on the open road is 5th not 6th when towing and a sensible speed of 80kph. On a good flat section you'll find you will go to 6th and if you push it you can certainly do over 100kph towing. Off road the gearing and anti-stall make it fantastic.

    I agree that 5th gear is best for towing, Im regulary towing 3t plus, but blow 80 kph, no problems sitting on 100 on flat going still under 3000rpm and humming along nicely. If a hill was steep enough to reduce speed below 70/80 kph then it probably not safe to go faster regardless of how much power you have, you still have to be able to stop and negogiate corners and in this regard the defender is the best of any vehicle I have driven.

  3. #13
    JohnR Guest
    Yup as Scollops said to the cape and back no dramas. I didn''t get a chance to go over a weigh bridge but I m guessing around at least 1.5T. I was easily able to cruise at 120kph, dropping back to 5th and 100kph for hills.

    I'd be a little concerned if you feel it's labouring at 750kg's ??? Might be worth while getting it on a dyno?

    Cheers,

  4. #14
    WD 130 Guest

    Puma towing

    Defender seems to tow this boat alright fuel economy goes to 21L/100 K but our F250 does the same thing at 27L/100K. We can do the speed limit at 100kmh on the flats and slows a little on hills, sometimes have to go back to 4th but 5th is fine most of the time. Stability is the main issue as with a cross wind it does make it a little unstable, this is where the F250 shines as it wieghs 3.5 ton itself. The boat weighs 3.5ton dry is 2.8 m wide and overall 9m long, certainly gets a few looks being towed buy a DefenderLeeman 09 088.jpg

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlB View Post
    I had forgotten about that video Dullbird, it really is an amazing performance. I would really like to know what the hitch set-up is on the back of the D90.
    It's a 5 tonne dixon bate jaw.

    It uses 4x bolts through the rear cross member.

    M

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    where every one holidays, sunny coast
    Posts
    1,712
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thats one hell of a tinny
    and to you have to have long vehicle sign on it

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ipswich Qld
    Posts
    1,309
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WD 130 View Post
    Defender seems to tow this boat alright fuel economy goes to 21L/100 K but our F250 does the same thing at 27L/100K. We can do the speed limit at 100kmh on the flats and slows a little on hills, sometimes have to go back to 4th but 5th is fine most of the time. Stability is the main issue as with a cross wind it does make it a little unstable, this is where the F250 shines as it wieghs 3.5 ton itself. The boat weighs 3.5ton dry is 2.8 m wide and overall 9m long, certainly gets a few looks being towed buy a DefenderLeeman 09 088.jpg
    Bloody nice set up Mate.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day camel_landy

    Others have intimated that the rear cross member (on 2007+ Defenders and as used in the video) is not strong enough for towing/recovery without tying back to the chassis rails. Is the use of a substantial backing plate enough sufficient to strengthen the rear cross member?

    Cheers
    KarlB
    Canberra

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Further to my earlier comment/question, I have just had a look under the rear of my 2010 D90 and you can't even access the back (ie front facing) of the rear cross member without removing the bashplate for the plastic fuel tank and that looks like it would be problematic and may require the fuel tank to be removed first (via the floor)! Can recall exactly what the rear cross member of a D110 looks like from the outside (ie the rear) but what the D90 has is a series of holes with 'nuts' welded or fixed in some other way (4 small above two large).

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think the 4 small holes will what be get used when fitting the land rover tow bar to the back as a plate bolts to the front of the cross member as well as the tow bar going back to the chassis rails
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!