Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Problems with defenders steering sector shaft

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Dougal, do you reckon it's a machining/transition issue or just too small a section and that point is obviously the weak point ?
    I couldn't say without inspecting both and doing a lot of work.

    But generally with fatigue if the stress is low enough (i.e. the load applied is low enough) then you can last for millions of cycles without any problems. The higher the stress gets, the more critical every little transition becomes. Any transition that's a bit rough becomes a great place for a crack to start.

    I think inspection/testing is the way to sleep at night. For example if the parts that break have 15 years and 300,000km service, then an inspection of the replacements at 7 years and 150,000km more would make a lot of sense.
    Overload testing doesn't shorten the fatigue life, it actually increases it. Because it over-stretches and stress-relieves the material around the crack which takes a lot of the usual smaller cycles to overcome.

    Just like bike spokes. If you don't stress-relieve them by stretching then they can break heads off within a couple of years.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    [snip]

    Overload testing doesn't shorten the fatigue life, it actually increases it. Because it over-stretches and stress-relieves the material around the crack which takes a lot of the usual smaller cycles to overcome.

    Just like bike spokes. If you don't stress-relieve them by stretching then they can break heads off within a couple of years.

    Slightly different but in a similar vein, FoMoCo did testing years ago on con rod bolts in a race motor simulation and the results were interesting.

    Over tensioned bolts had a fatigue life not much shorter than bolts with the correct pre-load/stretch, but under-tensioned bolts had something like half the fatigue life.

    Wish I still had the report.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130

    Slightly different but in a similar vein, FoMoCo did testing years ago on con rod bolts in a race motor simulation and the results were interesting.

    Over tensioned bolts had a fatigue life not much shorter than bolts with the correct pre-load/stretch, but under-tensioned bolts had something like half the fatigue life.

    Wish I still had the report.
    Is this due to the acceleration and shock caused by the movement within the gap?
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by flagg View Post
    Is this due to the acceleration and shock caused by the movement within the gap?
    There are a few factors at play.
    One is the change in bolt tension being a bigger proportion of the bolt load.
    Another is the higher preload meaning more of the load is taken by reducing compressive stress in the contact face and less by the bolt holding the cap to the rod.

    The second point is a concept that took me a long time to be comfortable with. It's one thing to be told about the effects, it's another to convince yourself it actually happens.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've only seen one broken one in my career,but I wonder how many series 1,2 and 3 Landrovers have come to grief over the decades due to the relay shaft breaking in half ? These are significantly smaller in section than Defender/Disco sector shafts, although being unpowered and with the trackrod high up at front they would only be subject to attack from shocks due to the crap leaf suspension as opposed to impacts from the linkage striking offroad obstacles and input torque from the hydraulic power assist.
    Wagoo.

    Edit. BTW,As with all tech discussions I'm happy to be proven wrong,I'm also here to learn. but IMO the theory that heavy duty trackrods contribute to sector shaft failure is not correct. By way of explaination lets imagine the trackrod and tierod ends are strong enough not to bend or break when the trackrod strikes a rock or stump.
    What would happen? Well if the object is solid enough the vehicle would come to a sudden stop with both front wheels remaining parallell.Strike the obstacle with a standard trackrod and what happens? The trackrod bends easily and quickly wrenches the left and right hand swivel housing in opposite directions. Guess whats attached to the front of the left swivel housing. Yes the drag link, which is also attached at its other end to the sector shaft via the Pitman arm. So this sudden and barely resisted shock loading from the left swivel being wrenched to left lock applies a massive and sudden torque force to the sector shaft. A torque force that a stronger trackrod would have reduced

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!