LR's don't have a history of wheel bearing problems,the new design is easier to use but for me,like I said earlier it's the dumbarses that keep driving until the bearing welds to the stub thats the bigger issue. Pat
 Wizard
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 OldBushie
					
					
						OldBushie
					
					
                                        
					
					
						LR's don't have a history of wheel bearing problems,the new design is easier to use but for me,like I said earlier it's the dumbarses that keep driving until the bearing welds to the stub thats the bigger issue. Pat
All the manufacturers seem to be going away from field serviceability Bill.
Nissan moved from the easily serviced GQ twin nut and bendable tab setup to the GU's single nut that you need a pin tool for and a locking ring that uses screws.
OK, it's easy enough to make the pin tool, but there isn't enough screw positions on the locking ring so you often end up with either too much pre-load or a loose wheel bearing
I suspect Land Rover would prefer if you didn't take your vehicle offroad, modify it in any way, and replaced it when the warranty runs out (if not sooner).
I bet it won't be long before the bonnet on landies (and other vehicles as well) is "sealed for life" with a sticker like this:

 Wizard
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Rick,I have that style of adjustment system on my McNamara 1.5'' halfshaft upgrade spindles, and whilst it is a bit of a fiddle, the key on the washer is offset relative to the screw holes, and if you flip the washer you can usually get a reasonable adjustment.
I don't necessarily agree with Pat that LandRovers are not prone to wheel bearing issues. The heavy service bearings on Series vehicles had a thick depth of case hardening and could be adjusted virtually forever, but the case depth was much thinner on later bearings on vehicles beginning with the first Rangerovers .I've replaced many badly pitted wheel bearings over the years on later vehicles, and the more closely spaced bearings of even later vehicles tended to wear quicker again,according to the likes of Maxidrives Mal Story who often bemoaned the change to close spaced bearings.
Wagoo.
 OldBushie
					
					
						OldBushie
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Wagoo,the only damage I've seen on LR wheel bearings is from damaged seals,water ingress etc,I've never replaced a set that wore out and I've had and worked on some very old LR's. Pat
I agree 100% with Pat303. My previous one got its first WB change at 121,000 miles (195,000km, 11 years old) and it was due to water ingress on perished seals. I replaced all 4 after the first one started squeeling and found rusty water in all of them mixed with the bearing grease (300Tdi, so "dry" axles) and they were still fine in terms of tolerances. Not even sure how long the water was in there!
Changing seals every few years should keep the bearings happy, even on the new setup.
The Td5 era onwards Defenders got the spacer in between the bearing inner races, and a stakeable locknut. IF you have a bearing failure and the inner race rotates, then the spacer could and most probably will be compromised in terms of thickness, the best way to overcome this problem is Psimpson7's comment about reverting to the early 2 locknut system and discarding the spacer and stake nut.
Have done many like this and is how they should've been from the factory IMO.
Never had any problems with the Tdi models and RRC's, if the bearing tolerances were excessive then most normal people would feel a soft brake pedal or during ROUTINE SERVICING ( something I see missed on a LOT of landies) the endfloat would be checked and rectified.
I'm not liking the 'set and forget' methods employed more and more these days, promotes laziness.
JC
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks