Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Defender 30% more $

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    4000
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Question Defender 30% more $

    Gday all,
    I'm came to this forum on a mates advice,
    as i am wanting a secondhand Land Rover Defender 110 Ute as a second vehicle.
    1st of all, Great Forum guys lots & lots of good advice here
    & plus all u suckers have made all the bad mistakes & can pass on what 2do & what not 2do
    I've been looking around & for a little while not much was advertised.
    Now ATM there seems to be **** loads out there, good for me i guess more to choose from.
    But now i'm thinking i should just sell my little car & buy a New LD 110 Ute, basically just have 1 vehicle.
    Yesterday i go looking on the Net to see what they are worth
    i ended up looking at RedBook for a guide for the R.R.Price
    then i thought while i'm at it i'll see what the alliteratives are worth.

    Now brings me to my Question guys -
    What are we getting for the 30% higher price ($11000.)

    I'm hoping someone can point out why there is so much of a difference & what do U get for it.
    Don't me, but i don't see the extra value in it, what am i missing

    I've owned a 89 4Runner it's just a glorified HiLux.
    This little truck had taken me everywhere i need to go (camping up top,NT ect)
    & this was a long time ago.
    I know access to a lot of places has improved so thats gotta be good for the softroaders out there too,
    more tourists $, yada yada yada.

    A comparison of some below -

    Vehicle and Year 2011 Land Rover Defender 2011 Ford Ranger 2011 Mitsubishi Triton 2011 Toyota Hilux
    Vehicle Description 110 Cab Chassis 2dr Man 6sp 4x4 2.4DT (110) [11MY] PK XL Cab Chassis 2dr Man 5sp 4x4 3.0DT MN GLX Cab Chassis 2dr Man 5sp 4x4 2.5DT [MY11] KUN26R SR Cab Chassis 2dr Man 5sp 4x4 3.0DT [MY12]
    Valuation Prices
    Price When New $45,990*Price Guide $31,990*Price Guide $34,590*Price Guide $34,990*Price Guide
    Green Credentials
    CO2 Emissions 295 251 212 217
    Green House Rating 4.0 5.0 6.0 -
    Air Pollution Rating 3.0 3.0 3.0 -
    Overall Green Star Rating
    -
    Fuel Urban (l/100km) 13.6 11.7 9.8 10.2
    Fuel Extra Urban (l/100km) 9.7 8.2 7.0 7.0
    Fuel Combined (l/100km) 11.1 9.5 8.0 8.2
    Quick Info
    Badge - XL GLX SR
    Series 110 PK MN KUN26R
    Body Cab Chassis Cab Chassis Cab Chassis Cab Chassis
    No. Doors 2 2 2 2
    Seat Capacity 2 3 3 2
    Transmission Manual Manual Manual Manual
    Gear Location Floor Floor Floor Floor
    Drive 4X4 Constant 4X4 Dual Range 4X4 Dual Range 4X4
    Fuel Type Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel
    Release Year 2011 2011 2011 2011
    VIN Number SALLDHHS78A###### MNA?SAE90?W###### MMAENKB40A?*##### MR0DZ22G800######
    Country of origin UNITED KINGDOM THAILAND THAILAND THAILAND
    Dimensions
    Kerb Weight (kg) 1641 1804 1648 1675
    Tare Mass (kg) 1641 - 1711 -
    Gross Combination Mass (kg) 6550 5546 5700 5335
    Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 3050 3046 2930 2835
    Pay Load (kg) 1409 1242 1282 1160
    Towing Braked (kg) 3500 3000 3000 2500
    Towing Not Braked (kg) 750 750 750 750
    Wheel Base (mm) 2794 3000 3000 3085
    Length (mm) 4370 4848 5030 4980
    Width (mm) 1790 1788 1750 1760
    Height (mm) 2021 1743 1775 1795
    Track Front (mm) 1486 1445 1505 1510
    Track Rear (mm) 1486 1440 1500 1510
    Engine
    Engine Location Front Front Front Front
    Configuration In-line In-line In-line In-line
    Engine Size (cc) 2402 2953 2477 2982
    Cam Overhead Cam Double Overhead Cam Overhead Cam Double Overhead Cam
    Engine Cycle 4 Stroke 4 Stroke 4 Stroke 4 Stroke
    Engine Type Piston Piston Piston Piston
    Engine Number 061120 - ####### WEAT-###### 4D56 ***#### 1KD-#######
    Engine Code 244DT WEAT 4D56 HP 1KD-FTV
    Cylinders 4 4 4 4
    Valves per Cylinder 2 4 2 4
    Compression Ratio 19.5 18 16.5 17.9
    Power 90kW @ 3500rpm 115kW @ 3200rpm 131kW @ 4000rpm 126kW @ 3600rpm
    Torque 360Nm @ 2000rpm 380Nm @ 1800rpm 400Nm @ 2000rpm 343Nm @ 1400-3400rpm
    Acceleration 0-100Km/h (secs) 15.8 - - -
    Induction System Turbo Intercooled Turbo Intercooled Turbo Intercooled Turbo Intercooled
    Fuel Type Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel
    Fuel Tank Capacity (litres) 75 70 75 76
    Fuel Delivery Direct Injection Direct Injection Direct Injection Direct Injection
    Method of Delivery Electronic Electronic Sequential Electronic Sequential Electronic Sequential
    Fuel Urban (l/100km) 13.6 11.7 9.8 10.2
    Carbon Dioxide (g/km) 295 251 212 217
    Fuel Extra Urban (l/100km) 9.7 8.2 7.0 7.0
    Fuel Combined (l/100km) 11.1 9.5 8.0 8.2


    guys now play nice, i'm still new here.
    Last edited by Rickoz; 19th September 2011 at 01:24 PM. Reason: Removed most of comparison list too much, sorry

  2. #2
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Welcome !



    That table is VERY hard to read.

    It depends entirely what you want in a vehicle?

    Off Road Capability
    High Payload?
    Car-like On road manners
    Off Road comfort?
    etc etc etc.

    You really need to decide first wat you WANT before assessing which vehicle is "best".
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The difference I've found having had most of them is the defender has done everything I've ever wanted to do without spending money them other than fit winches,seat covers,tow bars etc were's the Jap utes need better seats,better suspension,more servicing,more exxy servicing,higher fuel use etc.I also find the seating in the defender better for driving and I like the way they feel on the road,jap utes handle like crap with mushy front ends and horse cart rear leaves. Pat

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The other aspect is that as a new vehicle, the Defender has never sold in big numbers (compared to the opposition). But as a used vehicle they are sought after (capable, business like, to the 4wd point) but their numbers are still less than the opposition - supply and demand pure and simple.

    If there is less supply and equal or more demand than for the opposition - clearly prices will rise. Even though only 2/3rds the price new - after about 10 years a Defender will normally be worth more than a similar condition Discovery - the Defender has the least depreciation rate of all the Landie range.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good point,both my defenders where bought new because second hand prices were so close,130's hold their value very well. Pat

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ourimbah
    Posts
    409
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rickoz View Post
    I've owned a 89 4Runner it's just a glorified HiLux. This little truck had taken me everywhere i need to go (camping up top,NT ect)
    Ok I used to drive a 1991 4 Runner until it blew a head gasket at 350K, and then I bought the 2010 Defender. I have only done 17K in the Defender so it is only early days, but some comparisons so far are (you need to take into account there is 20 years difference in build date);

    4 Runner:
    16 L / 100km
    Drove like a car as it has independent suspension / small wheels.
    Used to get hot towing, on the beach and in cold weather would not start again after stopping if engine had not cooled down.

    Defender:
    10 L / 100km
    Brilliant off road, however you have to take it easy on the highway.
    On Sunday it did a full day of 4wdriving with 500kg camping/recovery gear and then towed a 2+ tonne trailer home. The temperature needle did not budge.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    4000
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    Welcome !
    That table is VERY hard to read.
    It depends entirely what you want in a vehicle?
    Off Road Capability
    High Payload?
    Car-like On road manners
    Off Road comfort?
    etc etc etc.
    You really need to decide first wat you WANT before assessing which vehicle is "best".
    Yer a little small sorry,
    I'm sure they would be all capable vehicles for most people one would think.
    High Payload, not hi on my list of must haves.
    Road Manners, yep nice to have a comfortable vehicle & higher up on list of must haves.
    Off Road Comfort, Yep again higher up on list of must haves.
    Oh i did decide but looking at 11ish extra G's brought me to ask the Questions.
    Thanks for your input VladTepes

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    4000
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    The difference I've found having had most of them is the defender has done everything I've ever wanted to do without spending money them other than fit winches,seat covers,tow bars etc were's the Jap utes need better seats,better suspension,more servicing,more exxy servicing,higher fuel use etc.I also find the seating in the defender better for driving and I like the way they feel on the road,jap utes handle like crap with mushy front ends and horse cart rear leaves. Pat
    Good to know, not much more needed to spend on vehicle. Pretty good as is.
    Thanks PAT303
    Last edited by Rickoz; 22nd September 2011 at 03:50 PM. Reason: should read B4 pressing the little save button

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    4000
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    The other aspect is that as a new vehicle, the Defender has never sold in big numbers (compared to the opposition). But as a used vehicle they are sought after (capable, business like, to the 4wd point) but their numbers are still less than the opposition - supply and demand pure and simple.
    If there is less supply and equal or more demand than for the opposition - clearly prices will rise. Even though only 2/3rds the price new - after about 10 years a Defender will normally be worth more than a similar condition Discovery - the Defender has the least depreciation rate of all the Landie range.
    Garry
    Good to know, Better resale value.
    Thanks garrycol

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    4000
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by Beckford View Post
    Ok I used to drive a 1991 4 Runner until it blew a head gasket at 350K, and then I bought the 2010 Defender. I have only done 17K in the Defender so it is only early days, but some comparisons so far are (you need to take into account there is 20 years difference in build date);

    4 Runner:
    16 L / 100km
    Drove like a car as it has independent suspension / small wheels.
    Used to get hot towing, on the beach and in cold weather would not start again after stopping if engine had not cooled down.

    Defender:
    10 L / 100km
    Brilliant off road, however you have to take it easy on the highway.
    On Sunday it did a full day of 4wdriving with 500kg camping/recovery gear and then towed a 2+ tonne trailer home. The temperature needle did not budge.
    Sorry i made a mistake mine was a 1987 not a 1989
    Fuel consumption on the current list is - RedBook again
    Vehicle and Year 2011 Land Rover Defender 2011 Ford Ranger 2011 Mitsubishi Triton 2011 Toyota Hilux
    Fuel Extra Urban (l/100km) 9.7 : 8.2 : 7.0 : 7.0
    Fuel Combined (l/100km) 11.1 : 9.5 : 8.0 : 8.2
    FYI, My little 4Runner got me 100ks for every 10L driven hard or not stayed the same (even with different width tyres on it too)
    I think i did all up about 350000- 400000Ks in her.
    Thanks for your comments Beckford
    Last edited by Rickoz; 22nd September 2011 at 04:07 PM. Reason: again should read B4 pressing the save button :)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!