380
 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Whats the differnece betwene these two boxes?
And what would be the best behind a 200TDi and infront of a Series 3 transfer case and vehicle ? (mated via an ashcroft conversion kit)
cheer
Jim
380
The R380 is 30mm longer than the LT77, but if you can find an R380 off a 200Tdi Defender they are shorter than the Disco version (and the selector mechanism/gearstick is in the correct place for the Series/Defender shape.)
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
The 380 is better
The Lt77 has a problem with the lay shaft that gives them back lash. Seen people send thousands to fix the box only to have the same problem 4 months later on. Although saying that I have had a few LT77 and still good boxes once you get used to the back lash but if given the choice I would go for a R380
Ali
95 300 Tdi Defender 90
99 300 Tdi Defender 110
92 Discovery 200tdi
50 Series 1 80
50 Series 1 80
www.reads4x4.com
The LT 77 is not quite as strong and has reverse up alongside 1st and the R380 has it under 5th.
As far as I am aware, in Aust the R380 was not fitted to the 200tdi - was introduced with the 300tdi and serpentine 3.9 in the discos/defender.
So the LT 77 will definitely fit a 200tdi - but the R380 is a better box. As indicated the Defender version has a shorter bell housing.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks