Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: To much lift! (Is there any such thing?)

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Tamworth, NSW
    Posts
    50
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRanger View Post


    I just went and checked the bumpstop and centre of hub to metal guard edge clearances and I have 130mm front bumpstop clearance,and while I have longer rear bumpstops,taking into account the extra length of the bumpstop,would give me approx 140mm bumpstop clearance on the rear.
    And my hub to guard clearances are 600mm on the front and 620mm on the rear.And I run a genuine 3" lift,this is why I can't fathom the specs you listed for yours.
    Thanks again Wayne, I appreciate you taking the time to crawl under yours to check. I think I might not be following procedure here, and have measured from centre of hub to the bottom of the standard plastic flare (touching the tape on both). Apologies if this is not standard practice and has caused confusion.
    Going off your bump stop clearances, I do seem a bit tall....... And you would be bang on for a 3" lift as you said.
    The guy who got back to me so quickly at Dobinsons has been out of the office since Wednesday apparently, and the supplier will deal with me (by confirming if my clearances are normal) when they are good and ready it seems.
    I will be sure to post on here the end result of all this for future reference.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat The Rat View Post
    Thanks again Wayne, I appreciate you taking the time to crawl under yours to check. I think I might not be following procedure here, and have measured from centre of hub to the bottom of the standard plastic flare (touching the tape on both). Apologies if this is not standard practice and has caused confusion.
    Going off your bump stop clearances, I do seem a bit tall....... And you would be bang on for a 3" lift as you said.
    The guy who got back to me so quickly at Dobinsons has been out of the office since Wednesday apparently, and the supplier will deal with me (by confirming if my clearances are normal) when they are good and ready it seems.
    I will be sure to post on here the end result of all this for future reference.
    Pat
    The only reason to use the measurements to the bottom of the metal wheel arch and not the plastic flare,is to take out as much variance as possible caused by the plastic flares drooping over the years due to being knocked and leaned on etc.I can't give you measurements to the lip of the plastic flare,as I have different flares,mounted in different positions.
    If your bumpstop clearances are correct,then in my opinion,it is way too high and will make the vehicle very unstable,particularly on sideslopes.
    With the height I run,I have no problem clearing my 35's and am able to fully cycle my suspension,and the vehicle is very stable offroad
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    350
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    I'm one of those that don't believe you need to lift a Defender.


    Having said that I would not say No to the portal 130 below, exept I'd need a ladder to get in.



    Each to their own
    and this bloke on the link below seems to have all the answers. Worth a look

    Defender suspension lift/Upgrades - LR4x4 - The Land Rover Forum
    Seen the blue 90 at Billing show a couple of years ago. Just another badly liftet dead trap....IMO

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have just checked my bump stop clearance. I have 150mm in the front, measured from the rear of the bump stop. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1336195352.435568.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1336195388.358805.jpg.

    I have included a side shot for you to compare heights. My tyre is a 285/75/16 or 33".

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat The Rat View Post
    Thanks for that link. Every time I see a pic of Equipe 4x4 gear I think its looks dead flash.
    Interesting they mention dislocation cones - I have been quoted these as part of my $2.5K 'fit it pack' to get my car pointing up the road correctly again. I have an open measurement of 710mm for +5" Terrafirma shocks (hope i'm not incriminating my supplier before there is a chance to sort this out). Now, I can jack my 110 up until the shock mounts are this far apart, and they aren’t coming loose. Just adds to the frustration is all... Getting this stuff offered to me that I am supposed to blindly bolt in.... Mind you, given my track record with these coils
    I have found photo's of a tape against the coils, my front free length is 500mm and the rears are 550mm. What are yours.

    Are you saying that when you jack the vehicle up on one side inducing articulation, the shock reaches full travel and the coil is still seated.

    I have found that with such a tall coil trying to get a coil to unseat in the drive way is very hard. You need a real world test as this pushes the oposite side up further then just jacking one side.

    I have terrafirma +5 shocks front and rear with +2 towers on the front and the rear mounts to suit the +5 shocks. I believe you don't need the +2 front towers and will change them out for standard height one day.

    I have slotted swivels for the castor. I would never use castor correction bushes. I do have 6 degree arms in the shed to fit later on, I want them as they are cranked at the chassis bush, I don't really need them but it will give me a little more flex over what I have now. If you go slotted swivels you can usually get away with wide angle uni's instead of a double cardon joint.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lambrover View Post
    I have found photo's of a tape against the coils, my front free length is 500mm and the rears are 550mm. What are yours.

    Are you saying that when you jack the vehicle up on one side inducing articulation, the shock reaches full travel and the coil is still seated.

    I have found that with such a tall coil trying to get a coil to unseat in the drive way is very hard. You need a real world test as this pushes the oposite side up further then just jacking one side.

    I have terrafirma +5 shocks front and rear with +2 towers on the front and the rear mounts to suit the +5 shocks. I believe you don't need the +2 front towers and will change them out for standard height one day.

    I have slotted swivels for the castor. I would never use castor correction bushes. I do have 6 degree arms in the shed to fit later on, I want them as they are cranked at the chassis bush, I don't really need them but it will give me a little more flex over what I have now. If you go slotted swivels you can usually get away with wide angle uni's instead of a double cardon joint.
    Mark
    The only problem with going back to standard height front towers and running the "+5" shocks,is that you run the risk of the shocks topping out,unless you run extended bump stops.
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRanger View Post


    Mark
    The only problem with going back to standard height front towers and running the "+5" shocks,is that you run the risk of the shocks topping out,unless you run extended bump stops.
    yeah correct. I reckon it would be better because with taller coils your compressed length is obviously taller than standard coils so you won't hit the bump stops as you will bind before this. So making use of the wasted up travel, converting it into down travel makes sence.

    I thought you ran standard height front towers/turrets ?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lambrover View Post
    yeah correct. I reckon it would be better because with taller coils your compressed length is obviously taller than standard coils so you won't hit the bump stops as you will bind before this. So making use of the wasted up travel, converting it into down travel makes sence.

    I thought you ran standard height front towers/turrets ?
    Coil bind is one of the reasons I that I changed my coils.You want to be able to allow the suspension to maximise up travel,as down travel is limited by the suspension bushes.I have raised front towers,which allow my 35's to fully tuck into the guard cavity,maximising up travel without topping out the shocks.The secret is finding a shock,with a short enough closed length,and a long enough extended length,maximising the full movement available with the standard Land Rover front link setup.
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I would be surprised if at full compression you were on the bump stops.

    I know mine do not, ImageUploadedByTapatalk1336205118.494640.jpg

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    im wondering if your front coils had been installed upside down? reason I say is because my 98 110 cam stock with varibale rate coils and the top 3 coils were bound up 4 years in...

    with that much lift rotating the swivels is a must to return the castor....but your axle roll axis is going to be high oversteer front and rear meaning that bump steer will be high as will squirliness on uneven cambered roads.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!