Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 109

Thread: late td5 or early puma?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Aircon in my 2001 Defender was much better than my 2005.

    I like my Td5 and have had no big dramas. Oil in harness - less than $400 repair by dealer. Cheaper if you are half decent with a spanner and screwdriver.

    Puma certainly goes better on the highway......but then again so does a transit van!

    I reckon you role the dice and take your chances. Either of them could be fine.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The fam. will most likely prefer the Puma...but hey, you'll love it too. As Pat said, drive a TD5 then jump out and drive a Puma....it's chalk and cheese.
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scallops View Post
    ....it's chalk and cheese.
    .....but don't try writing on a blackboard with cheese!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    How does the TD5 go with a good VNT and a little tickle up of the ECU compared to the TDCi ?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    not having driven a puma with a chip in it

    Ive driven plenty of chipped td5's and one VNT'd td5 and my SOPDyno says that the VNT doesnt let you make any more power or torque overall but it delivers it in a whole new way.

    the td5 has more CC up its sleeve and an extra pot to push the crank round with so paperwork maths says the td5 should be able to be pushed further than the puma
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,947
    Total Downloaded
    0
    From what I've read on the ever reliable internet most of the reputable tuners in the UK still consider the TD5 to be the king of the mountain as far as tuning goes, (for now).

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tewantin (NOOSA area)
    Posts
    636
    Total Downloaded
    0
    "and an extra pot to push the crank round with so paperwork maths says the td5 should be able to be pushed further than the puma"

    Is formally called "Power Overlap" ie another cylinder firing while one is still on power stroke - is measured in crank angle

    RF

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    not having driven a puma with a chip in it

    Ive driven plenty of chipped td5's and one VNT'd td5 and my SOPDyno says that the VNT doesnt let you make any more power or torque overall but it delivers it in a whole new way.

    the td5 has more CC up its sleeve and an extra pot to push the crank round with so paperwork maths says the td5 should be able to be pushed further than the puma
    That's the way I'd look at it too, but I think so far the UK tuners are getting slightly more out of the 2.4 than the TD5 (with VNT)

    Uninformed and I backed to backed his stock or slightly de-tuned HS2.8TGV with 3" exhaust against my fuelled up Tdi and outright power was much the same, maybe even a slight advantage to the Tdi and it felt like it possibly revved a little better ? But the TGV had it all over the Tdi below about 1800RPM.
    The Tdi had to move a 130 CC too with 255/85's, vs a 110 trayback with 235/85's, so it wasn't comparing apples to apples but an interesting although unscientific little exercise one evening.

    I'm seriously thinking a worked over TD5 with a good VNT might be an easier/cheaper re-power for my Tdi than the 4BD1T (as blasphemous as that sounds )

    I just don't think sticking a VNT on a TDi is worth the $, the TD5 has so much more potential and is overall a more robust design.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Fischer View Post
    "and an extra pot to push the crank round with so paperwork maths says the td5 should be able to be pushed further than the puma"

    Is formally called "Power Overlap" ie another cylinder firing while one is still on power stroke - is measured in crank angle

    RF
    I think Dave might actually know that Rick

    We had a good discussion on the torque impulse vs crank angle of a 4 vs more cylinders on a 4BD1 thread a few weeks back.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perf, WA
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm content for a (relatively) modern diesel engine... if it does freeway speeds and meets my (prob not v demanding) off-road requirements, i'll be happy

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!