Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 106

Thread: Awesome Fuel Economy NOT!!!!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    1,329
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The best I ever got in my now gone Puma was 520km and that was being very easy on her (90 kph) as the service station we had planned to fuel at had long closed. It seems anything over 100kph is an expensive drive.

    Allan

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    smurf village
    Posts
    8,332
    Total Downloaded
    0
    in our 300tdi when i was on my L's i got 8.5L/100km if i sit on around 100km/h (aka green P's) i got around 10L/100km but dad said he use to get around 11L/100km. I think they say in the 4x4 mags that is is around 11.5L/100km

  3. #23
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The engine should free up as you put more kms on it. The fuel economy should get better and I suspect that the claims of less than 10lt/100km are under very favourable conditions, too high a speed or a head wind will knock the figures about.

    Drive at a safe speed at or below the speed limit, fill the tank when the fuel light comes on. Don't get involved with setting internet fuel economy records and enjoy your vehicle.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My SVX fully trip loaded (roof rack with AusTent, 2nd spare, chain saw fuel on it. And all the other stuff we need and lots we don't) running 285x75/16, bull bar winch, storage drawers etc.....can get 10.5 to 11.5 litre/100k if you happy to sit on 90 to 100k's/hour.

    Just got back from Vic High Country. On the way down trying to make up some lost time, sittng on 120k's all the way and got 14.5L/100k.

    Way home, taking it slower we got 11.5l/100.

    The funny thing is on the tracks 2nd and 3rd gear, about 30km/h I get as good consumption as on the highway...go figure

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sydney via Tassie
    Posts
    105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Babs
    Fuel consumption seems a bit on the high side.
    We completed a round trip from Sydney to Broken Hill, Menindee Lakes, Mungo National Park, Mildura, Echuca, Lakes Entrance, Merimbula, Canberra and back to Sydney earlier this year in a 2008 Fender
    We used 444lt of fuel at an average of 11.22lt per 100km. (loaded for touring)

    Here is the link to the tread where I uploaded a spreadsheet with the figures.
    Maybe your fuel consumption will drop as you put a few more km on.

    Puma 4000km round trip from Sydney

    Cheers
    Gav

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    W can get 11 from ours.....

    We were getting 15 pulling a tons worth of trailer off road....

    The engine will be pretty tight as its new economy does improves as the engine loosens up.

    Also what fuel are you using I know that some people have seen diffences between using different brand deisels. It will also depend on how you drive.

    There can also be other factors such as dragging hand brake etc.... What I would suggest is to watch the car closely over the next couple of tanks making sure you note your economy and if it doesn't improve alert your dealer because getting high 14s is not typical.
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Fuel economy over a single tank of fuel will also be prone to errors, much better to average over multiple tankfulls.

    Some recent figures (300Tdi) all fully laden and long trips






    Thankfully fuel prices have come down from where they were in 2008


    Martyn

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tangambalanga
    Posts
    7,558
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My rig is the 2.4 2011.
    I have to find some fuel receipts to clarify how much/many liters I generally put in, but I think it's around the 60-65lt mark (?)
    When we picked ours up, we were gettin just on 600k's per tank (till the light came on). It got a little better, just over 600k's, but then the roof rack went on, and the RTT and it plumitted to around 500k's, then put the 31's on which didn't seem to make any difference, but with the engine loosening up, I get just over the 500 mark.
    Running up to Albury and pushing it, we're lucky to 450. One thing that does seem to make a difference too, is fuel used. I run Shell Extra which is ok, if I run BP fuel, I get less than normal.
    Does anyone have any other input on fuel types.

    Having said all that, I don't really care what my consumption is, having come out of a V8, I'm better off by a lot

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    We use BP but have notice a better run from callex at times
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    1,329
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Drover View Post
    My SVX fully trip loaded (roof rack with AusTent, 2nd spare, chain saw fuel on it. And all the other stuff we need and lots we don't) running 285x75/16, bull bar winch, storage drawers etc.....can get 10.5 to 11.5 litre/100k if you happy to sit on 90 to 100k's/hour.

    Just got back from Vic High Country. On the way down trying to make up some lost time, sittng on 120k's all the way and got 14.5L/100k.

    Way home, taking it slower we got 11.5l/100.

    The funny thing is on the tracks 2nd and 3rd gear, about 30km/h I get as good consumption as on the highway...go figure

    Our fuel economy was way off that with almost the same setup, my fuel use went up to 16ltrs per 100km at times, I admit big load and boat in tow(14ft) but I think it's the lack of the concorde effect of a Defender. They just don't poke holes in the air well. The little ninety seems to return the same economy at all speeds or load within reason so perhaps it's gearing having less effect on the drag. As you say Drover "go figure" it's very strange and I would like to know the Transit fuel useage at the same load and speed figures. I always attemted to use B.P. and if not would use 200/1 two stroke mix so I did try all the suggested remedies. My wife's TD5 gets about the same mileage as the Puma per tank so obviously power cost money as the tank is smaller.

    Allan

Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!