Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Rear Hub Removal

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 460cixy View Post
    Late model just has a single lock nut arrangement I think there staked from memory I haven't done one in a long while
    This is correct. Td5's don't have 2 lock nuts. They have a spacer between the bearings to set the clearance, and one nut which is done up tight then staked.

    You can swap to the earlier 2 locknut setup if you wish as the stubs axles are the same.

    not very clear but does show it:


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Psimpson7 View Post
    This is correct. Td5's don't have 2 lock nuts. They have a spacer between the bearings to set the clearance, and one nut which is done up tight then staked.

    You can swap to the earlier 2 locknut setup if you wish as the stubs axles are the same.

    not very clear but does show it:

    thanks pete, are these nuts a use once only?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tewantin (NOOSA area)
    Posts
    636
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by weeds View Post
    i thought td5 should still have lock washers.....i doubt anybody would have modified the setup. i would have thought you would stil be running a slas diff

    52mm from memory, if you have a landy repairer in cairns they should stock hub nut spanners, $10-$15 much cheaper than a socket
    2 1/16" actually, but 52 will do However, if it is on a Puma the "tin" tube spanner type may not be up to the 150 ft lbs torque required to "preload" , nor may they have the square drive needed for torque wrench.

    Standard socket won't go over the axle, needs to be "deep"

    I was lucky, club member had toolmaker "homemade" jobbie. Need to build my own.

    Note that on Puma the Nut itself is staked, not the washer. Having recently done mine (last week) reckon nut can be used twice but needs to be replaced next time (with correct torque it goes back exactly the same place).

    Cheers

    RF

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Rick, the tube type works fine up to 90lb/ft, and mines worked OK since my first Jeep in 1984. (yes, they use the same nut )

    IIRC mines a 3/4" drive so I just use a 3/4" male/male square drive adapter and a socket on the tension wrench.

    BTW, I'm guessing in theory you'd need a few spare shims with TD5's and TDCi's to set the pre-load correctly when changing wheel bearings or even to account for minor wear in the cone.

    As we've discussed before, I like the old double nut/lock washer setup.

    It's dead simple to get the pre-load right, wind the lock nut on, bend the lock washer and off you go.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tewantin (NOOSA area)
    Posts
    636
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Rick, the tube type works fine up to 90lb/ft, and mines worked OK since my first Jeep in 1984. (yes, they use the same nut )

    IIRC mines a 3/4" drive so I just use a 3/4" male/male square drive adapter and a socket on the tension wrench.

    BTW, I'm guessing in theory you'd need a few spare shims with TD5's and TDCi's to set the pre-load correctly when changing wheel bearings or even to account for minor wear in the cone.

    As we've discussed before, I like the old double nut/lock washer setup.

    It's dead simple to get the pre-load right, wind the lock nut on, bend the lock washer and off you go.

    I might be lucky, no shims! Might be different when I eventually have to change a/all the bearings out. That woudl possible be the time to double nutting it.

    RF

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,947
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    BTW, I'm guessing in theory you'd need a few spare shims
    So call me pedantic for carrying these around



    (in the car, not on my person...)

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TimNZ View Post
    So call me pedantic for carrying these around



    (in the car, not on my person...)
    You're a pedant

    At least you don't have them jammed in you pockets, that'd just be weird

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Gippsland - Victoria
    Posts
    2,907
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Seems to me that the 'old' system is simpler, cheaper, has no 'specialised' parts and is a lot easier to fix on the road.

    Is there any benefit with the 'new' system.?

    Deano

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!