Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 87

Thread: Lift Kit Requirements to fit 255/85's

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Gisborne
    Posts
    402
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I run those tyres on my td5 on standard rims and I have no issues. I know other guys who haven't had to lift their defenders. I don't think the puma is much different to the td5 regarding height requirements. Personally I'd recommend a double Cardon prop shaft if you lift it.

    Cheers
    Mick

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Landsdale, Perth WA
    Posts
    32
    Total Downloaded
    0
    cheers noogie, I have bought the tyres and there sitting at the tyre shop waiting to be fitted so I may just slap em on the sawtooths and find out for myself if it rubs on anything.. as for the lift the only thing I am hesitant about is the fact the 4WD shop which is a landie specialist didn't say I needed a DC shaft but yet it seems to be common knowledge on here.

    Might have to get a second opinion on the subject.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,028
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Going from a stock 5.5 rim to a wolf 6.5 rim also changes the tyre profile slightly when mounted (ie the tyre will be a touch wider on the wider rim)

    Even with no spring lift the rear tyres (235 on a 5.5) come very close to rubbing on the spring perch. Add taller, wider tyre on a not much less backspace rim and its not going to go away.

    Add a lift and it gets worse.
    The 255 is 20 mm wider. The rim is 25 mm wider and the width is all to the outside. The inside of the tyre won't stick in any further than stock. Anyway, I've seen a few 110s in person with 255s and Wolf rims and none had any rubbing issues. They put the tyre in a nice location that does not stick out past the flares. If you go bigger like 285/75, then the aftermarket rims with less offset are needed.

    How does a lift make it worse? The axle travel is the same as before.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,028
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    They are a good simple strong rim. They are just wide enough for a 255, maybe even too narrow legally at 6.5? They just do not have enough negative offset.

    Rick130 has come from running 255s on wolf rims to Mach5s with only .5inch more negative offset and 7 inch wide, its made noticable difference.
    And just so we don't get confused on terms. All of these wheel/rims we are discussing have positive offset (the tyre is offset closer into the car than the mounting surface).

    Normally a 6.5" rim is legal for a 255/85.
    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | BFGoodrich Tires

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    21
    Total Downloaded
    0
    does anybody see driveline vibes after a spring lift of 50mm with the TD4 ? IIRC the pre-TD4 have the engine/gearbox take 50mm usually without issue. But the TD4 could be more prone to, due to engine/gearbox angled upwards more than the earlier Defenders.

  6. #36
    n plus one Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by landybehr View Post
    does anybody see driveline vibes after a spring lift of 50mm with the TD4 ? IIRC the pre-TD4 have the engine/gearbox take 50mm usually without issue. But the TD4 could be more prone to, due to engine/gearbox angled upwards more than the earlier Defenders.
    The TDCi (Puma) engined Defenders are more prone to front Uni binding as a result of a lift. It seems like most need a DC, although some have got away without it.

    FWIW a DC was also recommended by certain suspension manufacturers (OME for example) when lifting a TD5 engined Defender, although in practice the seem to be less sensitive to a lift.

    I fitted a DC to my Puma prior to lifting it so I don't know if I could have got away without it.

    I'll be interested to see if 255/85s work we'll on Sawtooths. I know i had rubbing with 265/75s on Boosts.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you lift a PUMA you will need a DC prop shaft, make no doubt about it !

    After a lift PUMA's will suffer from either binding of the uni joints & those that don't bind they will vibrate at around the 80-90k's. Without exception !


    Some of the other thing you will at least need to do, if your going to do it properly are
    - caster correction control arms
    - new front sway bar mounts to lower the sway bar to prevent rubbing on the front prop shaft.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    The 255 is 20 mm wider. The rim is 25 mm wider and the width is all to the outside. The inside of the tyre won't stick in any further than stock. Anyway, I've seen a few 110s in person with 255s and Wolf rims and none had any rubbing issues. They put the tyre in a nice location that does not stick out past the flares. If you go bigger like 285/75, then the aftermarket rims with less offset are needed.

    How does a lift make it worse? The axle travel is the same as before.
    When I mount my 235 on a 5.5 then a 6.5 rim, they mount up the exact same profile?? I think not.

    While you math tells you that the 255 on the 6.5 is all out board, it is not. Mount a 235 to a 6.5 then mount a 255 to the same 6.5 and measure from the WHS to the furthest inside of tyre and they WILL be different.

    SO, back to mo original post, I have 235 on these so called wolf rims, the turning circle is not great and the tyre rubs on the spring perch. Tell me how it is not going to change if I were to fit 255s. It's not just the width, but the height. The taller/larger OD tyre will contact the RA and spring perch before the 235, even if it was not wider, which it is....

    Think about the Roll Center, the point at which the axle wants to pivot about. This does not change in the rear with a spring lift. Raise the chassis on the springs and now the tyres are arcing into the spring and perch more so than over the top of it.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    And just so we don't get confused on terms. All of these wheel/rims we are discussing have positive offset (the tyre is offset closer into the car than the mounting surface).

    Normally a 6.5" rim is legal for a 255/85.
    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 | BFGoodrich Tires
    yep agreed, they need less positive offset, or more negaitve offset (heading in the same direction, but not the best way to describe it I agree). yes it could still be a positive offset rim with less positive offset.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Landsdale, Perth WA
    Posts
    32
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks drover your info has been extremely helpful. I guess I am a little cautious as I know all about the consequences of lifting a vehicle. My last car ended up with a 6inch lift and needed a hell of a lot to get it driving ok to say the least (jeep Cherokees don't lift well) it's funny how land rover spend bulk money on engineers to get the setup right from factory and then we come along and mess with it and expect everything to sweeeet...

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!