Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 61

Thread: 2014 DEFENDER ISSUES

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    193
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just to complete the story ...






    [ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mwBaUoRVJY[/ame]

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Perth W.A
    Posts
    466
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Brilliant!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    577
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I took delivery of a MY14 110 wagon in April 2014. I now have just under 24,000 km on the clock and have had a total of zero issues so far.

    Let's hope it stays that way

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    The EGR redirects exhaust gas back through the combustion cycle which lowers the temps enough so that NOX,the naughty part of the emissions that kills baby seals is reduced,manufacturers also had the engines inject diesel on the exhaust stroke to ''burn'' off harmful emissions that also kill baby seals but the diesel doesn't burn cleanly so soot replaced the NOX,so manufacturers then fitted particulate filters that injected more diesel down the exhaust to burn off the ''dirty'' soot,the type that kills baby seals but standards got tighter so even that isn't enough so know they fit injectors that injects wee wee into the exhaust that reacts with the harmful emissions,the type the kills baby seals so we are left with engines that eat their own poo,inject more food in to help eat more poo and then finish off with a drink of wee,but you will sleep soundly at nigh knowing the baby seals are safe,that is until they lie on the beach and are eaten by orca's. Pat
    Fair enough Pat, but in terms of the balance of my question, why do owners disable it, and are there any dangers in doing so?
    Pickles.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They disable it because it's been proven without question that engines run better without them,the sluggish hesitant traits of many engines are caused by the EGR. Pat

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks, Like a lot of "anti-pollution" stuff,...I can understand that.
    Finally, are there said to be any "dangers", or anything of a negative nature that could occur to the engine, that could be attributed to this, in any operating circumstance?
    I did say I was "mechanically hopeless"! Pickles.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    By disconnecting it all you are doing is making the engine the same as any other pre 2000 or so diesel engine,going off the experience of the Td5 which was the first LR engine to have an EGR and the first to be disconnected it'll pull harder,get better economy,run smoother and in pretty much every sense be better. Pat

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    just recently bought into a BAS remap primarily to disable the EGR after reading for months many stories related to how the normal means (blank it off) don't work so well on the TDCis.

    Exchanged emails with Pete Bell about this how his remap might get me to where I want to go (EGR always closed and no MIL lights or other issues).

    An interesting comment he made at one stage was that the TDCi ECU does make "emergency" calls to the EGR (to open up) to protect the engine (my assumptions: by lowering power output & combustion (?) temperature when it is deemed such action is needed.)

    Thus a benefit of (his) remap is that in normal operation the remap may call for 0% EGR open. However if a critical situation arises and the ECU wants to deal with it by opening the EGR to lower power output and combustion temps - it still can.

    Sounds pretty reasonable and sensible to me.
    Last edited by tact; 10th July 2015 at 11:28 AM. Reason: Separate out my assumptions
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ^^^ The reason BAS and Alive are so highly rated,I bet the chip makers don't have that. Pat

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dubbo
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    just recently bought into a BAS remap primarily to disable the EGR after reading for months many stories related to how the normal means (blank it off) don't work so well on the TDCis.

    Exchanged emails with Pete Bell about this how his remap might get me to where I want to go (EGR always closed and no MIL lights or other issues).

    An interesting comment he made at one stage was that the TDCi ECU does make "emergency" calls to the EGR (to open up) to protect the engine (my assumptions: by lowering power output & combustion (?) temperature when it is deemed such action is needed.)

    Thus a benefit of (his) remap is that in normal operation the remap may call for 0% EGR open. However if a critical situation arises and the ECU wants to deal with it by opening the EGR to lower power output and combustion temps - it still can.

    Sounds pretty reasonable and sensible to me.
    In Malaysia you could probably change to a warm climate thermostat too, if you so wished.
    With the extra power coming from the remap it'd give you a bit more of a safety margin under high throttle.
    Its on my list for the not-too-distant future.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!