Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Monocoque for new Defender?

  1. #1
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Monocoque for new Defender?

    From the US Publication "Automotive News"


    http://www.autonews.com/article/2015...-defender-back


    Defender: Land Rover's least expensive range will be the revamped Defender, which hasn't been sold in the United States for years. The redesigned Defender family will be sold here, but it isn't clear whether every variant will make it overseas.


    According to reports, the Defender will be launched in 2018, and there will be five variants, including two two-door models, a four-door with a long wheelbase, and two- and four-door pickups.


    The Defender will move to unibody construction but maintain its off-road capabilities.

    Not sure where they are getting their information from but it appears our hopes / assumptions for a D4 chassis based Defender may be dashed.


    The article also says that in the US Market the next iteration of the LR4 (as its known over there" will be called the "Discovery". How novel.


    If the idea of a unibody 'Defender' comes to fruition, perhaps they'll called it the "Surrender".
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  2. #2
    Tombie Guest
    Why? Vehicle construction has come a very long way and there is no reason a UniBody constructed vehicle couldnt be stronger, lighter and more rigid or have better longevity than a body on chassis...

    Keep an open mind...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Exactly, i believe the only reason that the D3/4 carries extra weight is because it was designed to be monocoque but for whatever reason they went with a chassis instead.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Dubbo
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Whenever Land Rover bring out a new model it is usually light years ahead of what everyone else in the industry is doing, so expect the new 'Defender' to be vastly different (as it is now) from the cart sprung, drum braked, part time 4x4 utes flooding the market.

    This could well include a monocoque construction. Or it could be something we haven't even thought of.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    Exactly, i believe the only reason that the D3/4 carries extra weight is because it was designed to be monocoque but for whatever reason they went with a chassis instead.
    IIRC the reason was that it wasn't able to withstand the stresses of real off road Land Rovers have made their name off and they didn't want it to be another soft roader like the X5 BMW etc.

    Won't the new Discovery be on the aluminium chassis same as the Range Rovers (excluding the Evoque)

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #6
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wouldn't monocoque be more expensive to repair though, and easier to write off?
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  7. #7
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    Wouldn't monocoque be more expensive to repair though, and easier to write off?
    The alloys used in modern automotive construction are required to have specific repair techniques or be written off regardless...

    No more "heat, bash, bend, respray"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    Wouldn't monocoque be more expensive to repair though, and easier to write off?
    Smash Repairers, at least in NSW, are no longer permitted to straighten a chassis or subframe.

    The result is that lots of repairers have some very expensive car platforms.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    upper hunter
    Posts
    154
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Problem with unibody design is the fact that most parts if the vehicle are part of the integrity of vehicle. I would think your windscreens and quarter glassed wouldn't like corrugations and a damaged sill would be a big cause for concern. Bolt on bits would be practically non existant apart from a bull bar or tow bar.

    Might see a dealer spec nudge bar. Suspension would need to be more supple. I can see a biturbo auto driveline in the crystal ball too. No low range just an extra 2 low gears in slushbox... ..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    The alloys used in modern automotive construction are required to have specific repair techniques or be written off regardless...

    No more "heat, bash, bend, respray"
    The good old days, a gas axe, some bog and a bit of paint and off you go again.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!